Preview

Pluralism and Elite Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
567 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pluralism and Elite Theory
Pluralism and Elite Theory “Pluralism is the view that politics and decision making are located mostly in the framework of the government, but that many nongovernmental groups use their resources to exert influence”. Pluralists put forward the idea that power is not a physical quality that people have or do not have, but yet it flows from a variety of sources. It is the thought that people become powerful from ownership or controlling resources. “Malcolm X, for example, was certainly not a rich person. But by using resources such as his forceful personality, organizational skills, and especially the legitimacy of his cause, he had a greater impact on American politics than most wealthy people.” Pluralists do not believe that anyone is “all powerful” unless it is proven through a direct observation. “Elite Theory is a theory of the state which seeks to describe and explain the power relationships in contemporary society.” Elite theory is essentially an antonym to the theory of Pluralism because Pluralists suggest democracy as a utopian idea. Elite theory is based on two major ideas, one being that “power lies in position of authority in key economic and political institutions,” and “the psychological difference that sets Elites apart is that they have personal resources, for instance intelligence and skills, and a vested interest in the government; while the rest are incompetent and do not have the capabilities of governing themselves, the elite are resourceful and will strive to make the government work. For in reality, the elite have the most to lose in a failed government.” Pluralism and Elite Theories are known to be polar opposites of each other. The Elitists believe that a small out-numbered group of economic “elites” and action planning networks would hold the most aptitude, no matter what the outcomes of elections. Whereas Pluralists suggest that true efficiency lies within a vast number of affiliations, even if they do not correlate within


Cited: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralism_(political_theory). Pluralism, 2012. Web. 27 January 2012. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080825225540AAa0EB8. Difference Between Elite and Plural Theory, 2009. Web. 27 January 2012. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite_theory. Elite Theory, 2012. Web. 27 January 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Gove Study Guide

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages

    Elite – identifiable group of persons who possess a disproportionate share of some valued resource- in this case political power…

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralist democracy works with numerous organised groups who all have some political power in the decision-making setting. It assumes that it’s ‘neutral’ government who listens to, and acts on the outcomes of these competing interests. Thus the large number and operation of pressure groups is considered to be a vital element in the promotion of pluralist democracy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acquisition of power by leaders via competitive elections (representative democracy or elitist theory of democracy)0…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Policy-Sierra Club

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Behavioral Pluralism identifies a certain set of constituency attributes that contribute to the success of advocacy groups such as the Sierra Club. According to Grossmann’s theory these constituency attributes dictate advocacy groups like the Sierra Club’s…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 10, 11, and 6 Notes

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Pluralism: idea that citizens should be informed and should participate in democratic decision making to ensure the health and vitality of the system…

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ideally, a working and trustworthy democracy requires a general public composed of good and educated citizens that will act and vote on what is best for the society as a collective whole. This concept is rather too idealistic, for class and social divisions profoundly beget and affect individual interests. In effect, determining what the objectives and priorities should be in empire building can be difficult in the realm of a democracy, given the vast number of people who are entitled to participate. This complexity that lies in the determining of the “general will” consequently inhibits effective solutions in government.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chavez Ravine Theory

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The theory of interest groups (or veto groups) opposes the theory of power elite. The theory of interest groups state that, the power in a given society is distributed to different, and distinct people, and different organizations, and those people and organizations have interests that are differing, and conflicting with each…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bicameral Senate Power

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dye and Zeigler’s Elite Theory claims that representative democracy is not really based on the will of the people, but a small elite class that governs the masses. “Only one branch of the new government, the House of Representatives, was to be elected by popular vote. The other three controlling bodies-the president, the Senate, and the Supreme Court–were removed from direct voter participation” (2009). According to Dye and Zeigler none of the delegates showed any enthusiasm for mass participation in democracy. The two chamber split appears to support Dye and Zeigler’s argument on Elite Theory…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although individuals might argue that American elites are crucial factors that allow the United States to be a successful and powerful country, this is only true in some cases. By looking at this argument from a general perspective, this is false. Many times large corporation owners or any other powerful individuals will use lobbyists to carry out their own ideas. Lobbyists attempt to influence decisions made by officials in the government for a profit from wealthy American elites. In the 1980s, retired former…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada Interest Groups

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Another factor making the political party inferior is its longstanding values, territorial basis restricting it from expansion since political parties aim to accomplish control of legislative. Hence since the legislature is based on a territorial perimeter, the rest of the political party body must follow in this direction. In contrast to some interest groups, political parties have not fully been able to achieve a system which incorporates the public into the policy making process. Pross questioned whether the fragmentation of the political parties endangers long-standing institutions, or if this merely is the politics of the new age. Canada has witnessed the emergence of a new public philosophy “pluralism” started taking the place of the previous representative parliamentary democracy. Pluralism emphasizes the collaboration between government and interest groups. Ideally members of private groups exchange ideas and negotiate with government civil…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States there are many different power relations. Many people argue that one of these political theories are better than the other one. In politics political participation, political institutions and public policy is a big part in politics. The political theories that are presented are Pluralism, State Autonomy, Elite Theory, Marxism, and Class Domination. Pluralism Theory is a center of how power is distributed between many groups. In State Autonomy there are two clear opposition sides between the states and they act in their own interests. Elite Theory is the theory of the states who describe the power relationships in the economy. Marxism Theory is the transition from capitalist to socialism. Class Domination…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The importance of elites in high governmental positions- there has to be centralisation in a government, because according to… the majority are disorganised etc, and therefore wouldn’t be able to handle governmental policies. Also been said that the elites have more to lose if everything was to fail, and therefore their best interests are with the people. ‘the mass, who lack both the will and the capacity for political leadership’. P72…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays