Preview

Point Shaving

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Point Shaving
I think that it's a tragedy to see that many collegiate athletes are involved in gambling situations. It's hard on the athletes too, because they're not getting paid to play the game so it's hard to resist thousands of dollars to only win by a few, in cases on point shaving. When I was watching that movie "Blue Chips", which is all about illegal college betting and buying athletes to come to their school, there was a scene involving the coach and the point guard regarding a point shaving incident three years ago. After the student was harassed by the coach he finally confessed saying, "We won the game, we just didn't beat the spread. That's only for those gamblers anyway". He has a point with what he said but that's not the point. A lot of young athletes do see point shaving as partaking in an illegal and unlawful event or don't believe that much in it, morally.
So people say that if the college players were getting paid none of this would happen. I don't know if giving the players a stipend is going end this because unless you're paying the athletes thousands of dollars a week or a game, the stipend won't be more than what they're being offered. I do think that it might help but I'm not sure if that help is going to make a big enough difference. On the same note, if you eliminate spreads, can they be sure that it will make a difference when it comes to gambling. Don't get me wrong, eliminating the spreads would decrease the amounts of point shaving incidents, but it won't necessarily stop them. Bookies can make up their own spreads and ask players to shave points regardless of the fact that the spread is not publicized. The bookie has an idea by about how much one team may beat another. I understand that they will probably never "eliminate collegiate gambling" but they're trying to limit and reduce it and I'm all for it too.
Unfortunately there is the big issue of the politicians and their campaigning for funds and it's going to be hard to control

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With the amount of money coming in as revenue for the colleges, the expenses are relatively minimal in comparison, and these expenses mostly include costs for colleges to either host or run a specific sporting event. The money that is left after expenses have been taken out is then reinstated to the colleges: “Each year, about 60 percent of all NCAA revenue is returned directly to the Division I conferences and member institutions. For the 2010-11 fiscal year, that figure was $478 million (61 percent)” (NCAA, Distributions). This does not seem right on many levels. The member institutions are receiving 60 percent of the money and retaining it for use throughout the college. There needs to be a change in policy for college athletics at a state level to distribute this money throughout the people who actually made it; the athletes.…

    • 6054 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction. We are in a heavily demanding athletic world that everyone feels they are entitled to money for their skills and that it is never too early to be paid millions if they think they deserve it. These athletes are infatuated with the life of the professional league players and the life these players live. The amount of money they make, the cars they own, or the houses they live in are a few of the things these athletes want. If the NCAA starts to pay elite players at the highest level, then they should also have to pay the players at the lowest level. There is no difference between these athletes, other than the school they play for and their skill level. They are all students who play a varsity sport. Every one of these athletes goes through rigorous practice schedules, long seasons, and high demands no matter what level you play at. Every team has the same goal of winning a national championship, so how could you pay the top players and not the lower ones if they are all playing for the same championship title?…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is point-shaving? According to the 2015 Merriam-Webster dictionary, point shaving is, “an attempt (as by a member of the team favored to win) to influence the final score of a game so that the predicted winner wins by less than the point spread.” So, for an example, if a team is favored to win by ten points, players from the favored team are paid to make sure they only win by 9 or less. The reason why this form of conspiring to rig games is popular is because it is sold to the athlete as a victimless crime. The team still wins the game, so the player or players involved in the point-shaving still celebrate a victory. The gamblers also get a win because they can bet more confidently on the other team to cover the point spread. College basketball is ripe for this coercion because all it takes is for the gamblers to get one or two players on the…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “The Shame of College Sports” Taylor Branch explains a large amount of corruption inside college sports and makes a case that colleges do not properly represent their student athletes and they should be paid.(Branch 227) One of the statements from UNC trustee Dan Curtis states “I think we should pay these guys something” sets up Branch to one of his first major statements in which he says “Fans and educators alike recoil from this proposal as though from original sin. Amateurism is the whole point, they say. Paid athletes would destroy the integrity and appeal of college sports.” (227) In this move he confronts what the vast majority of people believe and later goes on to further his view of the topic with an analogy of college…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Honestly, the the pros outweigh the cons on whether or not we should pay these college athletes, they spend all their time at the college and make money for them, they deserved to be payed something, time that could be spent with friends and family, and they’re instead spending their time in the gym or on the field. The amount of income would be based on the sport, gender, skill level, and school income. A list would be made by a committee of people to rank players from the top to bottom. They would rank the top players at that school and take a percentage of the school income from that sport. That way small D1 schools aren’t forced to go bankrupt. At a major D1 college the most they could get would be $10,000. This money would not be for them becoming rich. This money would go towards paying everyday things that we would buy. Almost like a bonus at a work company. Then the rest would get a small percentage of the total income. This is why I think we should pay college…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pay for Play

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ever since the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1905, their role in regulating intercollegiate athletics has involved many different tasks. These tasks include making athletics safe in order to prevent injury, marketing athletic events, regulating and changing rules in order to make college sports more fun for the fans, and enforcing the key principle of college sports: amateurism. Amateurism in college athletics means that athletes are unpaid. As a result, the NCAA has had to deal with deciding how to handle issuing and assigning monetary value of scholarships and grants. However, the NCAA has not had to manage the debate over college athletes getting paid to play. In a day where more and more college athletes are leaving college early to enter the professional leagues it is time to ask a question: Should division-I college athletes get paid? The question is based on the assumption that there is a place for college athletics within a university. The NCAA should be looked at economically because the universities within it generate profits through their athletic departments and operate as businesses by assessing costs, revenues, etc. With that assumption established, because of the market inefficiency and exploitative characteristics of the NCAA, division-I college athletes should get paid in a free-market environment. Division-I college athletes recognize that they are exploited and receiving a scholarship worth less than their market value, so they have no incentive to not cheat and accept illegal payments.…

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine what would happen if we would pay the college athletes for performing. It would be a disaster because that is all they would do, they would only play for the money. Most of the athletes wouldn’t play for the fun of the game, or the fame that comes with playing, they would just worry about the paycheck that comes with playing. If anything all of the athletes are paid already with scholarships and the free things they get to use. Not playing for money in college, will most likely make the athletes work even harder to get to professional sports.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, the University of Arizona just went through a big time scandal involving paying college athletes. One recruiting tactic used by tons of colleges is paying or bribing athletes to come to their school with cash or tangible items. These colleges get in tons of trouble and the players do as well. They usually use these tactics on poor recruits and these athletes receive pressure from their families to accept the offering. To help their family financially they accept the offer from a college and most of the time it goes unnoticed, but when these athletes get caught the consequences are tremendous. The athlete at Arizona had his reputation tarnished and his NBA dreams were crushed as well; all because he was trying to help out his family and did not want to struggle financially. So obviously under the table there are transactions happening and I feel that if the NCAA made paying college athletes legal less programs would get in trouble and the NCAA would no longer be corrupt. This would also make the NCAA more balanced because the bigger programs with more excess money would not be able to sway athletes with all this extra money. There are a ton of solutions to this problem, they could just make this bribing legal, they could make a salary system, or some kind of reward system for players. If a college were to make a salary based system for their college athletes it should be a single base salary only because every program spends roughly the same amount of time putting in tons of work even if they do not bring in as much money. If the NCAA were to make a stipend system along with commissions I feel that would be the best option. These players could receive commissions for jersey sales and possibly have some type of reward system that goes along with some kind of base salary so that athletes that do not play a lot are still able to…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College players should be given some financial compensation for their efforts. Colleges and other companies make millions off of players likenesses while players aren’t compensated. Colleges make millions off of ticket sales and players get minimal compensation in the form of college tuition. Some financial pay would keep great players in college for longer and make all sports better. Ed O’Bannon may have only been a stepping stone to greater freedoms for…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If college athletes do get payed like they deserve, it will take some time to adjust, but in the end it will result in a more competitive and balanced league. The money is continuing to grow as we speak, and it will not be stopping anytime soon. It is time to take care of the employees in this company. Student athletes deserve to get money and protection after sports for risking their bodies for the…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Money gives food, money gives water, money gives life, but money is not given to collegiate football athletes. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA, made a billion dollars on the games during March Madness and even after the nets were cut and a champion was crowned not a single player was give any money. Collegiate football players, or any collegiate player for that matter, should be paid for each game based on how hard they work and how dedicated they are to their sport. The athletes are the basis and the main reason the NCAA makes their millions. In addition, it can give these athletes a financial education and better prepare them for their future. Money is the reason people thrive.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the NCAA rules should be changed and let colleges pay their players because it will help the athletes with financial aid. In Malcolm Lemmons article Should, NCAA Athletes Get Paid he explains this quote, “ A player would be able to actually afford a decent meal and possibly send some of that money back home to support their families.”(Lemmons 1). Players in the NCAA usually come from poor places in the America and are not able to pay for meals at school and same with their families. This helps prove the point because many athletes come from low class urban area and parents do not have enough money to make good meals and also support their children by living in a nice area. Colleges have been paying player’s parents benefits or gifts for their…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When injuries take their tole on an athlete, the value of that player often time decreases. If an injury is serious enough, an athlete may be let go from a team. Student athletes risk their health to have fun and raise money that goes directly to the sport agents that they work for yet, they receive little to no money. This is unethical in the means that athletes put their lives on the line to make and raise money for the ones who watch it for entertainment and to gain money for their own uses. There’s no doubt that student athletes deserve pay. They put in too much dedication and commitment to receive very little…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A possible negative effect of paying collegiate athletes would be a decrease in competition. People believe college athletes should get paid as if it were a job, although this will create issues between rich and poor schools (Griffin 18). The rich colleges will have the opportunity to obtain the best athletes, causing the poor schools to not be as competitive. This issue makes the sports less competitive and entertaining, making fans less interested (Griffin 18). Since football and basketball bring in the most money, other college sports will not be able to be funded due to drawing in number one players to play football and basketball (Griffin 18). Most popular sports are men’s sports, therefore creating less…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should college athletes get paid? It is a question that as been asked for decades. Although it is a violation of NCAA rules to pay college athletes, many colleges have still done so. In the past, colleges have bribed athletes during the recruiting process, offering them cash to come play for their school. Jersey's, cards, collectibles, bobbleheads and a variety of other items are sold in merchandise stories around the nation.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays