If anything they did was called into question, they would ask “would a reasonable officer, in the exact same situation, respond the same way?” In the case of Graham v. Connor, the officers used more force than necessary in the situation. They were not listening to Graham when he was trying to explain that he was diabetic and needed some sugar. They instead cuffed him and threw him on the hood of the car. Throughout the process of his detention he sustained many different injuries. In this case the objective reasonableness for this situation, it is not there, the officers had no reason to use this much force when they were interacting with…
The Utah police shot a young man who had a golf club and thought his home was being burglarized. Although, the suspect could have been on drugs during the raid, the officers had the discretion to talk the gentleman down or to use force. In the video, it clearly shows that before the roommate could get out of the hallway, shots were fired. You can clearly see that the roommate did not have a gun, but that he had a golf club in his hand. In this case the police could have shot the man with a taser gun instead of a gun, or if they had fear of weapons used, they could have shot the man in a non fatal area. The second video shows the officer shooting someone who had a knife. The suspect was asked by police to put down his knife and within seconds the man was fatally shot. The officer could have given the man more time to drop his knife, no matter the area of where the man had the knife on him. Although the police camera did not record the visual aspect of the confrontation between the man and the officer, the officer decision cost a man of his life. In the recording the officer was asked by a woman who was near the scene why did he shoot the man. The officer responded and stated that he did not put the knife down as requested. The officer was cleared of any charges in this case. The officer could have given more time for the man to put the knife down or tased the man, or used pepper spray to ensure officer safety. The last video, although had no fatalities, showed that they officers were unethical in their decision making. The last video records officers joking and singing in a suspect’s musical equipment, after they enter the home believing drugs were sold out of the home. The homeowner did have personal use marijuana in the home not and enough to sell as mass distribution. After the officers realized that the musical equipment was expensive and exceptional the officers started…
Running Head: BECAUSE IT’S PROBABLE: REVIEWING PROBABLE CAUSE, WARRANTS, SEARCHES, ARRESTS, AND HOW THEY INTERTWINE.…
Police officers are vital in our everyday lives because they’re known and serve as reliable forces that aid in protecting our rights and ultimately, our lives. Law enforcement, and police officers in particular, have secured a lot of media coverage recently because there have been multiple cases where through excessive force, police have fatally shot and killed civilians. While it may be known for police to do this if it is necessary and for their own safety, some specific stories have been globally exerted because of the unlawful reason behind the killing and verdict of the police officers at fault. In a book assessing criminal justice, Robert E. Worden believes that on a theoretical standpoint, there are situational factors that are the cues…
However, before body cameras are liberally assigned to every officer, there needs to be more specific regulations and policies concerning when, where, and how the camera and its data should be used and what to do if rising opposition or concerns should appear. However, there are still many issues concerning the daily use of body-worn cameras that the people and governing organizations are slow to address. The distribution of body cameras has simply been too quick and needs further testing, clear policy limitations and proposals, and extended contemplation on all the possible effects or consequences before they become standard use. A police officer that is out on patrol sees a woman being beaten and robbed but when the officer pulls over to the scene the suspect had already gotten away while the officer checked on the woman. Even though the suspect had gotten away, the camera that was attached to the officers uniform and on the dash of his squad car caught the face of the robber and they eventually caught…
With our new technological day and age, everyone is carrying around their own mobile camera to capture every moment. Some of those moments, however, are not so appealing. Especially when you see a cop beating on someone. With no context, you may be too shocked to know what to think. If you find out that this person they were beating on was unarmed and the police officers didn’t even report hitting the victim, it may waver your trust in the police. Even though police work can be violent, we need to limit the needless brutality through relatively easy fixes so police officers can’t get away with hurting innocent people.…
In light of recent events, tensions amongst American communities and police officers have heightened due to the shootings of unarmed civilians and the alleged use of excessive force. These events have brought the integrity of police officers into question raising the question onto whether or not police officers should wear body cameras. This would serve to improve public relations with the local communities and provide a new source of indisputable hard evidence. Unfortunately, everything also comes with its disadvantages and while the benefits of body cameras do outweigh the negatives on paper, they may still not be enough to result in wide scale implementation. Such disadvantages include cost, as the cost of a single body camera ranges from $400 to $700 (Taser International Inc.) The reliability of these cameras may also be called into question as technological bugs are inevitable. According to research conducted by PERF and the COPS office, officers should be required to activate their cameras when responding to calls meaning that they are turned off while on duty. This may allow a police officer to tamper with evidence or to manipulate the cameras as they are in total control. Body cameras may be a potential solution for a growing problem, and while there seem to be an abundance of benefits, many drawbacks do also question the viability of such a project.…
Times outlines the major concerns surrounding the use of police body cameras. The article stresses two of the major scrutinies, privacy and the lack of official policy. With regard to issues over privacy, especially in cases involving domestic violence or rape victims, many worry the body cameras will not be used for their intended purpose; to capture events from an officers point of view. One Police Chief from Grand Junction, Colorado, John Cramper, remains torn. He wants citizens to feel free to talk to his officers as a trusted confidant and fears people will not be as open while being recorded on camera. Cramper, among other experts on the issue, strongly suggests that victims and witnesses should only be filmed with their explicit consent. Another notable skeptic, Missouri state Rep. Jeff Roorda, with regard to dashboard cameras states, “Instead of the cameras being there to protect officers, they get disciplined for petty stuff constantly…” Another legitimate concern expressed in the article is the issue concerning the lack of policy. “Faced with the challenge of striking a balance between transparency and privacy for citizens U.S. law enforcement agencies have not adopted a uniform policy for body cameras…” The article cites a recent federal survey of 63 law enforcement agencies across the country implemented the use of body cameras in the police force. The report states that nearly a third of these agencies have no…
Body cameras are becoming more and more prevalent with law enforcement agencies for many reasons. The biggest pros to having body cameras on law enforcement personnel is the reduction in unethical behavior while dealing with the general public, quickly determine baseless complaints against law enforcement personnel, and assault against law enforcement by the person or persons they are interacting with (Freund, 2015). Having body cameras can also be useful in gathering video and audio evidence while at a scene that will help in the conviction or acquittal of a crime. My department currently does not have body cameras, but when I worked patrol, reviewing my in car camera after an arrest helped me to see or reminded me of something that helped…
Since police body cameras have been introduced, 75% less accidents have occurred with officers that wore a camera in a California police trail (Koh). Throughout the years, police brutality has been a big topic that has taken over the news. Whether or not police should wear body cameras is a question that has many sides and has taken the public into an argument that people don’t know which side to believe. Even though some argue that policemen having cameras invades privacy, cameras should be used by policemen because they help gather information and makes everyone behave better.…
In this experiment we tested for the first time the effect of mobile cameras on…
Every day an incident happens between a police officer and a citizen but not always do people know what really happens in these cases. These cameras will retain track of what the officer says or does when at the prospect of the crime, keeping them liable. Police Foundations wanted to test out this theory with a yearlong study. The cameras on these police officers will be able to keep track of all the evidence from the scene of the crime and will assure accurate statements and facial recognition from the victims and witnesses. A fairly common approval for reducing police misconduct is to upturn the use of body cameras on police officers.…
There have been many complaints about if body cameras on police officers will work or not. There are two people that have different opinions that other people that think body cameras will stop police brutality against police officers. William N. Grigg, and Joshua Krause these people think body cameras on police officers will not work, and will not stop or decrease the violence from police officers. Grigg’s argument is Their arguments are that the officers from the SDPD forgot to turn on their body cameras while on duty. A crime that happened in April, Officer Neal Browder fatally shot a 31-year-old man named Fridoon Zalbeg Rawshannehad, who had been suspected of carrying a knife. After the shooting, no weapon was found, although Rawshannehad was carrying what has been described as “a shiny looking object.”(San Diego Cops…
The volatile issues that surrounds “racial profiling” has led police agencies across the nation to start collecting information about traffic stops, especially for people of color. The controversy is supported by research that police officers may be racially biased in their decision making to stop someone. The article that was published in 2012 studies the consensus and conflict theories concerning racial disparities in the rate of police stops. The author suggested that both police deployment and race out of place arguments played a significant role in explaining the patterns of street stops, traffic stops, probable cause and consent searches.…
The future of police work has change over the past ten years. An Officer’s word was good enough but like all things in life there comes a change. The change that we are seeing in law enforcement currently is the use of body worn cameras. The bigger agencies have had in car cameras for a long time but recently with newer technology officers are now being equipped with body worn cameras. The Executive Director of the Michigan Sheriff’s Association states ‘’ I think it’s a natural evolution from the dash cam,” and “This way, you see what the officer experiences, right or wrong”. (Wawrow p.1 2014) The debate on body worn cameras came mostly after the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. However…