Preview

Presence of Others' Effect on Behavior & Interpersonal Attraction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Presence of Others' Effect on Behavior & Interpersonal Attraction
1- The presence of others can impact people’s behavior in many ways. For example, social facilitation is a process where the presence of others causes you to perform better, but only on tasks that are easy for you; during tasks that are difficult, the presence of others causes you to perform worse. Another way people’s behavior is impacted by the presence of others is social loafing, when people are put into a group to complete a task, each individual will perform less than they would if they were working alone. Deindividuation is another example, where being part of a group causes a person to lose their sense of individuality and have a reduction of constraints against deviant behavior.
2- Three factors that increase interpersonal attraction are the matching hypothesis, reciprocity, and the hard-to-get effect. The matching hypothesis states that people are attracted to those who are equal or similar in physical attractiveness; having this balance allows both people to feel deserving of the relationship and stable in it. Reciprocity is an equal exchange of what we give and receive, for example, we like those who like us; if someone is attracted to you and always very nice to you, you’ll like and respond to that by being nice back and potentially being attracted to them as well. The hard-to-get effect is having the tendency to prefer people who are more closed off and selective with their social choices, rather than those who welcome everyone; so if one person is very picky with whom they date and only date few people, and another person will date anyone and everyone, we will try to date the person who is picky so that we feel that sense of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One theory is ‘The Matching Hypothesis’ which is a social psychological theory based on relationships, proposed by Goffman in 1952. It suggests that in order for a relationship to be a long and successful one; both partners in the relationship must be equally matched in attractiveness. The reason for this is due to fear of rejection, therefore when searching for a potential life partner the primary drive is to select someone who is similarly attractive.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    deindividuation include being in a large crowd, anonymity due to wearing a uniform and altered consciousness due to drugs or alcohol. Deindividuation leads to reduced inner restraints and therefore an increase in behaviours that are usually inhibited and also reduces the fear of negative evaluation from others. This leads to an increase in aggressive behaviours. Recent changes to this theory focus on the importance of private self-awareness rather than public self-awareness. Prentice-Dunn and Rogers suggested that being in a crowd makes people less self-focused, so less able to regulate their behaviour according to their internalised attitudes and moral standards.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deindividuation theory is a social psychological explanation of aggression. It explains how rational individuals can become aggressive hooligans in a mob or crowd as it suggests that losing their sense of identity and self awareness deindividuates people. Individuals in groups fail to see the consequences of their actions, and the social norms they would normally follow are forgotten and this is when aggressive behaviour occurs. Deindividuation causes people unquestioningly to follow group norms instead of personal norms and sometimes these group norms lead to aggression. According to Zimbardo, in a crowd we feel anonymous and unaccountable and thus are less concerned about negative evaluations by…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    week 5

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Identify any associated phenomenon with your selected behaviors, such as social facilitation, social loafing, or groupthink.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psy 400 Portfolio

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: To provide you with an opportunity to experience a group setting and analyze how the presence of others substantially influences the behaviors of its members through social facilitation.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attractiveness: we tend to develop relationships with people who are approximately as attractive as we are (tendency is called the matching hypothesis)…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    explains why people behave differently than normal when they are amongst a group of people.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify behavioral changes that result from the presence of others. Why does the presence of others produce changes in our level of performance or awareness?…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What makes us attracted to certain people more than others? The science of Psychology explains how people become attracted to one another. Also, society and the media influence us into thinking what traits are attractive. Some reasons for attraction have to do with familiarity and proximity. Biology also plays a role in determining what traits we will possess. Biology and Psychology work hand and hand to help us pick our mates. The guy Sarah met at the party, Jack, found he had a lot in common with Sarah. In the reward theory of attraction, we tend to respond more positively to relationships that have more rewards than costs. The theory that states that people like those whose behavior is rewarding to them or whom they associate with rewarding events. Some factors that have been found to be similar among people attracted to one another are age, education, religion, political affiliation, and socioeconomic background. These factors do not have to be shared to form a successful relationship, but they do tend to affect attraction. Despite the belief that opposites attract, people are more likely to be attracted to each other if they are of similar age, education,…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everybody Doing It

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This activity explores the issue of social influence—how the behavior of other people affects your behavior.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who become part of a group or are members of that group share similar characteristics of the same nature. “When there is proof of the uniqueness of a team, such person is believed to have an effect of black sheep, as he refused guidelines of the group and left the group. Individuals who are member of the group experience have more trouble with party members rather than out-group members.” (Fiske, 2010) Differences happen when an individual of a group understands and sees the implications of having a reward for his or her behavior. Difference happens when individuals understand and see the cost implications to reward their behavior. This behavior, deviance, is considered distracting and bad influence. It is considered negative when associated with criminals and addicts. People who deviate, are able to develop a sense of self-identity and truly are aware of the decision they are making. “Anomaly occurs because people develop an identity sense or self-understanding, which becomes their personal life standard,” however many of these people from the group become “anomaly learned contra conventional ways or objectives and attitudes of support in their early socialization. “ An individual is prepared for deviance with this type of learning and social behavior that prepares for elimination of conservative norms and legitimacy from the group. The process of deviance happens with normal learning processes and with different theories of association, attitude learning, motivation values and knowledge to a degree that all of these becomes part of his identity and makes him or her strong enough for commitment. The learning process and the socialization help the individual change a very straight forward experience eliminating all conservative standards to neutral place, eliminating the guilt, underlying important personal characteristics. Also, deviation of a group is possible for…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Social psychology focuses on three broad topics: how people think about, influence, and relate to one another.” (Social Psychology) When it comes to behavior and how people will act, many experiments were conducted to prove or disprove that “behavior is contagious”. (Social Psychology) Experiments such as Soloman Asch’s Conformity Experiment, Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiment and Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment all impacted modern psychology. These experiments proved that behavior is infectious and what some do impacts what others will do. In this paper, I will show that it is true, “behavior is contagious.” (Social Psychology)…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Proximity – People usually get to know people who are very close usually to their residence especially from an early age. Such proximities can create a spark of friendship among people.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What I believe attract us to one another is the physical appearance, what we see when we first meet a person, although there’s often more to that. The reason I say this is some people can meet someone who they physically like, but can be easily turned off by their personality or it can be the opposite where the person overlooks how less attractive the other person may be but their personality is what may have captured them. All other things being equal, we prefer highly attractive individuals as dates, as friends, and to interact with in a general situation. This so happens to be true in today’s society, women my age tend to want to hang around attractive or pretty girls oppose to someone who is less attractive. It makes them and their whole circle of friends look good. While individuals might desire a relationship with an attractive person, they might not desire a relationship with the not so attractive individual. For example, most people tend to date those who they feel they are more attractive too or have the same type of similarities and personalities from those who are less attractive but may not have the same similarities. I often wonder does it matter if the person you’re attractive to don’t share the same qualities. Even though opposites can attract whether their attractive or not?!…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology Final

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Chapter 11 Social Psychology: studies how your thoughts, feelings, and behavior are influenced by the presence of other people and by the social and physical environment. Social Cognition: studies how we form impressions of others, how we interpret the meaning of other people’s behavior, and how our behavior is affected by our attitudes. Person Perception: an active and subjective process that occurs in a interpersonal context; is influenced by subjective perceptions, social norms, personal goals, and self-perception. Person perception often involves using mental shortcuts−social categorization, implicit personality theories. Attribution: Explaining the behavior of others reflects common cognitive biases and explanatory patterns; fundamental attribution error, blaming the victim, hindsight bias, self-serving bias, and self-effacing bias. Attitudes: A learned tendency to evaluate an object, person, or issue in a particular way; can have cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components; although attitudes typically influence behavior, sometimes our behavior influences our attitude. When a person’s behavior conflicts with his or her attitude, cognitive dissonance may be the result. Prejudice: A negative attitude toward people who belong to a specific social group. Stereotypes: form of social categorization in which a cluster of characteristics is attributed to all members of social group or category; stereotypes are fostered by in-group and out-group thinking, and the out-group homogeneity effect; in-group bias occurs when we attribute positive qualities to members of our own group. Muzafer Sherif: Robbers cave experiment demonstrated that intergroup conflict can be decreased when groups engage in a cooperative effort. Social influence: social psychology research area that investigates how our behavior is affected by situational factors and other people. Conformity: when you adjust your opinions, judgments, or behavior so that it matches other people, or the norms of a…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays