Preview

Prima facie Duties and Ross's Theory of Right Conduct

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prima facie Duties and Ross's Theory of Right Conduct
Prima Facie Duties and Ross’s Theory of Right Conduct “There are other beings in this world whose condition we can make better in respect of virtue, or of intelligence or of pleasure” (Ross). W.D. Ross was a philosopher who developed the Theory of Right Conduct. The seven prima facie duties are central in Ross’s Theory of Right Conduct. The purpose of these duties is to determine what people ought to do in questionable moral situations. “A prima facie duty is a duty that is binding (obligatory) other things equal, that is, unless it is overridden or trumped by another duty or duties” (Garrett). The purpose of this paper is to explain the prima facie duties and Ross’s Theory of Right Conduct. To further demonstrate the theory it will be applied to a morally controversial case. In order to understand the concept of prima facie duties one must understand each of the seven duties. The first duty is Fidelity, this is the obligation to keep one’s promises and not participate in dishonesty. The second is Reparation, which is the duty to make up for any injuries one has caused others. The next duty is Gratitude, this states that one must show gratitude towards others for their help and if possible return the favor. The fourth duty is Harm Prevention that is the duty to prevent harm to others resulting from causes other than oneself. Next is Beneficence this is the duty to do good to others in order to promote their overall wellbeing. The sixth prima facie duty is Self-Improvement that is literally the duty to act in a way that improves one’s self and promotes one’s own wellbeing. Lastly, Justice is the duty that requires one to act in a way that promotes justice in a just manor. While all of these duties appear to be self explanatory and straightforward it can be difficult to determine when one ought to or ought not to perform an action. Ross’s Theory of Right Conduct helps to clarify when two prima facie duties conflict. Ross’s Theory of Right Conduct is a


Cited: Garrett, Dr. Jan. "A Simple and Usable (Although Incomplete) Ethical Theory Based on the Ethics of W. D. Ross." WKU. N.p., 10 Aug 2004. Web. 27 Nov 2013. Ross, W. D.”The Right and the Good.” Oxford University Press. N.p., 1930. Web. 27 Nov 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Paper--Bailout

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Markkula Center for Applied Ethics “A Framework for Thinking Ethically” Santa Clara University. 5 November 2009. <http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html>.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Boylan, M. (2009). Basic Ethics (2nd ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The word Deon is the Greek word for “duty” which is the central focus on Kant’s moral reasoning. It is the fulfillment of one’s moral duties and obligations to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do by the use of reason, logic, critical thinking and moral intuition, the moral duty to just do the right thing. The main ethical reasoning of Kant’s deontological ethics is based upon the concepts of duty and goodwill, the intention to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do which should be based on consistent and logical thinking and putting aside our personal interests and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ross, W.D., (2002). The Right and the Good. Edited, with an Introduction, by Philip Stratton-…

    • 1598 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assignment 4 Dedra Strayer

    • 2845 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Perle, S.(2004). "Morality and Ethics: An Introduction." Retrieved 2007-02-13., Butchvarov, Panayot. Skepticism in Ethics (1989).…

    • 2845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunt, L. H. (2011). Ethics. Web: World Book. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from World Book…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I pretty agree with W.D. Ross’s idea of Prima Facie Obligations. Just like everything else in this world, there are different moral obligations, and some are weighed more than others. When we consider what we should do in the situation that several moral obligations conflicts, we should choose the one which is more important. Actually, this is a kind of consequentialism. To decide which moral obligation is more important is by comparing the severity of consequence of each obligation. For example, facing a series killer, should I tell the truth to the killer about where my friend is or should I lie to him to save my friend’s life? To decide what I should do , I will compare the consequences of these two obligations and choose to lie to killer and fulfill the more important obligations of saving my friend’s life. I can say Ross’s Prima Facie Obligation is the mixture of consequentialism and non-consequentialism.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi 160

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Polman, L.P., & Fieser, J. (2012). Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, he sets forth to explain the relationship between actions and their moral worth. In this paper, I will begin by explaining what determines the moral worth of actions based on the three types of motivations, distinguishing particularly between actions from duty versus in accordance with duty. Then, I will explain the seeming contradiction set forth in Kant’s examples of actions from duty. Finally, I will describe how Kant believes that most actions stem from a place of self-interest rather than duty, and argue that his distaste for this “self-love” is highly hypocritical.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lo, B., and Whitehouse, M. (2010). Resolving Ethical Dilemmas, 4th Edition: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, p.…

    • 3289 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant vs. Singer

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Duty can be defined in numerous ways but what is difficult to know is what our moral obligations are? Immanuel Kant and Peter Singer have attempted to find a more simple, rational, and supreme rule for what our duty is.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rachels, James and Stuart Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 2010. Print…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will examine the practicality and applicability of Kantian moral law in comparison to the golden rule. The main focus will be with on categorical imperatives, hypothetical imperatives, duty, and good will when it comes to Kantian moral law. Then, with the golden rule the focus will be on the whole maxim, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, since it is quite simple. To help with the analysis of these two topics the examples of the death penalty and charity will be employed. I will use them to demonstrate the differences and similarities between the two ideas. My main argument is that while the Kantian moral law is obviously of a higher ethical standard than that of the golden rule it is not realistic or practical.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theoretical Framework

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deontology theories (theories of duties), developed under the inspiration of Immanuel Kant, distinguish right from wrong and emphasize adherence to duty as the primary degree of moral rightness. Right action is determined not by outcomes but by intentions. Instead of examining the consequences of actions, the choice is examined. The principle of respect for another is deeply imbedded in this theory and leads to the idea that respect for another includes respect for autonomous decisions. Informed consent is an application of this respect principle.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ross’s top duty is Non-injury and he believes that this duty, not to harm others physically or psychologically is important. Abdelhamid does not care for the human duties, especially the non injury. By bombing and harming health, security and happiness destroy people's duties. Ross would say that the action to kill Abdelhamid is the harm prevention duty. By preventing harm to others and protecting others from further non injury can be outweigh the other Prima Facie duties. Ross’s views is similar to how Peter Singer feels about civil disobedience and…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics