Pro Animal Testing Essay

Over the past five decades, public support for animal testing has declined tremendously. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. In my opinion, I do not support animal testing because there are better ways to conduct experiments, rather than using animals. Generally, there are the pros and cons of animal testing. However we can maintain animal rights. In my presentation, I will discuss them with supporting reasons include explanations and examples. There are many pros to animal testing. First of all, animal testing is said to be done in order to save human lives by using new drugs and medical procedures. Scientists
Animals are involved in testing the products such as cleaning products that assist humans less than medicines or surgery. Not only did the case raise the question of whether it is decent to intentionally bring such genetically defective beings into way of life, basic moral and legal issues were also raised by the researchers' efforts to patent the mice produced through their method. Take for instance, many patients who were administered the general anesthetic Methoxyflurane lost function of their kidneys because animal testing failed to expose possible kidney toxicity (“Animal Testing Facts,”
Animal rights proponents do not allow the human abuse of animals in any form (Cothran, 2002). Scientists have to develop alternative methods of testing and treats them in the ways respect their inherent value. For instance, a monkey’s suffering matter less than a human’s suffering but more than a rat’s suffering, which matters more than a chicken’s suffering (David, 2002, p. 36). Between 25 and 50 billion animals are uselessly killed in laboratories each year (“Animal Testing Facts,” n.d.). If these numbers maintain annually, the environment should be lost a natural