Pro Death Penalty Essay
Death Penalty
“The jury finds the defendant guilty, I hereby announce that Shawn Mendoza will be in five years of imprisonment and eight years on death row.” Shawn’s pupils dilated twice their size as the Judge’s words rang inside his ears. He slowly turned back to see his friends and family frozen in shock. They knew he was innocent; it was all a misunderstanding. Shawn’s wife, Celeste, had watery eyes that broke Shawn’s heart when he looked into them. The security handcuffed Shawn and walked him out of the room while his friends and family starred until he was no longer seen. There are criminals who commit small crimes, then there are other criminals who commit worse crimes. Even though the majority of people thinks criminals that commit …show more content…
The pros on death penalty are that the person sentenced to death for committing a very bad crime gets what he or she deserves and pays for what he or she has done. J. Budziszewski PHD says that society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him. Many people, including Budziszewski, think criminals should be put down for disturbing peace by taking lives and liberties. Many of their opinions are that if the criminal commits a big crime they should be executed to pay for what they have done. Budziszewski states that the death penalty is not revenge as all, that it is retribution which is guided by a different motive. Retribution and revenge are two different things. Retribution is a punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. Revenge is the action of inflicting hurt or harm on someone for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands. Revenge usually comes from someone who is in pain and has a hatred in their heart. “Retribution is the primary purpose of just punishment as such rehabilitation, protection, and deterrence have a lesser status in punishment than retribution.” (Budziszewski,
“The jury finds the defendant guilty, I hereby announce that Shawn Mendoza will be in five years of imprisonment and eight years on death row.” Shawn’s pupils dilated twice their size as the Judge’s words rang inside his ears. He slowly turned back to see his friends and family frozen in shock. They knew he was innocent; it was all a misunderstanding. Shawn’s wife, Celeste, had watery eyes that broke Shawn’s heart when he looked into them. The security handcuffed Shawn and walked him out of the room while his friends and family starred until he was no longer seen. There are criminals who commit small crimes, then there are other criminals who commit worse crimes. Even though the majority of people thinks criminals that commit …show more content…
The pros on death penalty are that the person sentenced to death for committing a very bad crime gets what he or she deserves and pays for what he or she has done. J. Budziszewski PHD says that society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him. Many people, including Budziszewski, think criminals should be put down for disturbing peace by taking lives and liberties. Many of their opinions are that if the criminal commits a big crime they should be executed to pay for what they have done. Budziszewski states that the death penalty is not revenge as all, that it is retribution which is guided by a different motive. Retribution and revenge are two different things. Retribution is a punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. Revenge is the action of inflicting hurt or harm on someone for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands. Revenge usually comes from someone who is in pain and has a hatred in their heart. “Retribution is the primary purpose of just punishment as such rehabilitation, protection, and deterrence have a lesser status in punishment than retribution.” (Budziszewski,