Preview

Probable Cause And Reasonable Suspicion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
772 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Probable Cause And Reasonable Suspicion
Probable cause and Reasonable suspicion are two legal terms used in the United States legal system, in this essay I will be comparing and contrasting the two terms as well as providing examples. Probable cause is the level of facts and evidence required to obtain a warrant for, or as an exception to the warrant requirements for, making an arrest or conducting a personal or property search, etc. when criminal charges are being considered. Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure. Persons arrested without a warrant are required to be brought before a competent authority shortly after the arrest for a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard by which a police officer has the right to briefly detain a suspect for investigatory purposes and frisk the outside of their clothing for weapons, but not drugs. While many factors contribute to a police officer’s level of authority in a given situation, the reasonable suspicion standard requires facts or circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a suspect has, is, or will commit a crime. While reasonable suspicion does not require hard evidence, it does require more than a hunch. A combination of particular facts, even if each is individually insignificant, can form the basis of reasonable suspicion. For example, police may have reasonable suspicion to detain someone who fits a description of a criminal suspect, a suspect who drops a suspicious object after seeing police, or a suspect in a high crime area who runs after seeing police. Probable cause and reasonable suspicion are both governed by the 4th amendment which states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons,


References: Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983), New Jersey v. T. L. O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985), O 'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987) Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) Regini, L. A. (July 1999). "The Motor Vehicle Exception: When and Where to Search." FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 68, 27-33. Handler, J. G. (1994). Ballentine 's Law Dictionary (Legal Assistant ed.). Albany: Delmar. p. 431. ISBN 0827348746. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Using the legal research tool Lexis, as available through Kaplan University, complete the assignment and provide your instructor with a detailed description of your search terms, techniques and results. With your submission, include a list of all Boolean search terms, or natural language searches, utilized to complete this assignment.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following paper discusses the use of warrants, arrests, and the searching of private residences, when the law enforcement officers involved have concluded that there is probable cause. Although, probable cause is a necessary requirement in the obtaining of a warrant and in the following through of arrest procedures, ironically, according to the Legal Information Institute at the Cornell Law School, “Neither the Fourth Amendment nor the federal statutory provisions relevant to the area define “probable cause;” the definition is entirely a judicial construct” (Cornell, 2006).…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have already gone over the exclusionary rules associated with unwarranted searches and seizures, now we need to look at warranted searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment requires that no warrants be issued unless based on probable cause by a sworn Affirmation, this applies to all warrants whether they are for search or seizure. In order to understand the concept behind warrants, we must also understand probable cause. The Supreme Court has defined probable cause as more than mere suspicion. The facts an officer is acting upon must be enough to convince the average person that the suspect committed or is committing the offense being investigated. (Worrall, 2012) In the academy they stressed this as less than beyond a reasonable doubt, but more than a hunch; which leaves a large area in between.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reasonable suspicion, like probable cause, is dependent upon both the content of information possessed by police and its degree of reliability. Both factors, quantity and quality, are considered in the totality of the circumstances, the whole picture, that must be taken into account when evaluating whether there is reasonable suspicion (Alabama v. White,…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Council Unit 7

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Office of the federal defender for the eastern district of california. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cae-fpd.org/History.htm…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A search warrant must always be based on probable cause. We can define probable cause by facts or circumstances that would lead a person to believe that the place needs to be searched for important pieces of evidence to be found (Swanson 35). The probable cause is established by what is called a written affidavit prepared by the law enforcement officer or investigator. In the affidavit, the officer states all known facts and circumstances involving the suspects and items that are expected to be found. An affidavit contains 3 main parts that need to be described: the person, the property, and the facts. The search warrant must always describe in particular the place that is being searched. The description must be detailed enough to where the place being searched can easily be distinguished from any other place. It can be very easy to confuse one property with another; this is why it is extremely important for the description of the building to be very detailed and accurate.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Numerous individuals have a vast misconstruing on the variations between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion. Why is it important for people to understand the differences between these two important concepts? Understanding the differences between the two is essential on the grounds that one will result in a lawful search and the alternative will cause an unlawful search and seizure. As a quick definition, according to the textbook, Probable Cause is a law enforcement officer’s belief that supported by evidences and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 205). Whereas, Reasonable Suspicion can be considered to be more of an inclination a law enforcement officer will get (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). Reasonable Suspicion is employed when conducting an investigative stop; conversely, Probably Cause is required to arrest or place a suspect into custody (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). An officer must have both Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. Officers are taught this during their time in…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attempts to define Reasonable Suspicion have been provided by both state and federal courts, yet the term is considered unclear but important to define because schools use it in order to conduct searches of students. Reasonable Suspicion in schools is defined as “a warrantless search of a student when officials have reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that interferes with school discipline and order”. The New Jersey State Supreme Court rendered its current definition due to the most recent court case of New Jersey vs. TLO. Theoretically, everyone should agree this standard is acceptable to uphold in any school, however reasonable suspicion allows for racial profiling to slip in, and it ineffectively protects the constitutional rights of students.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hart V Devlin Debate

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    [ 6 ]. Brian Bix, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context. Sweet & Maxwell; sixth edition, 2012, page - 173…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module property

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rapalje, S., & Lawrence, R. L. (1997). A dictionary of American and English law, New Jersey:…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    4. Woodley, M., (2005). Osborn’s Concise law dictionary. 10th ed. London : Sweet & Maxwell…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hart (1994) Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edn, 1994)…

    • 4197 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lovevinger, Lee (1952) "An Introduction to Legal Logic," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 27: Iss. 4, Article 1.…

    • 24446 Words
    • 76 Pages
    Powerful Essays