Preview

Problems of Liberal Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Problems of Liberal Democracy
The problem with liberal democracy

The myth of government in liberal democracy is that it is value neutral and functions only to create a space of freedom in which citizens may pursue their own goals whatever they may be, as long as they do not encroach on other people pursuit of theirs. In reality, liberal democracy is not neutral but imposes a view of the world dominated by the market and by the idea of accumulation. The state has much to gain by asserting the market is natural and that the one motivating force in society is self interest. It is up to the church to protest that, although the market is important, it may not be turned into the one determining force, it may not become idolatrous.
This has all come about because the debate about religion has ignored its primary aspect: the church as the body of Christ as hope for the world. This is where the rubber hits the road, not in endless and futile discussion about the existence of God or the origin of the world. The church carries the Christian story that frames humanity and its pain, joys and purposes in opposition to the story carried by the secular state. A debate that contrasts these two stories will reveal the truth and richness of the former and the shallowness and falsity of the latter. This is how the church must bring the battle to the door of secular society. We can no longer accept that the secular story is based on concrete realities while that of the church is mythological. What person who has experienced the love of another would assert that self interest is the highest motivating factor? Why would this person believe that the state is his saviour? Again, why would this person be persuaded that the other, who is beyond certain borders, is his enemy?
It is time for us to wake up and realise that we have been sold a lie and that liberal democracy, which we seek to export all over the world as the only form of government, represents an untrue conception of the human. While we may enjoy its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This reading, written by Donald Eugene Smith, communicates his perspective on what being a secular state means, and what a secular state should encompass. Smith’s key idea is that a secular state includes the individual, the state and religion, and that these three factors have interconnected relationships with one another. However, in their relationships it is vital, or ideal, that there is exclusion of the third factor in each relationship. For example, Smith states that in the relationship between religion and the individual, it is vital that there is no interference from the state, thus ensuring freedom of religion.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion is one of the pillars of society. It can be used to rule the common with fair and just practice or it can be used for a rulers own self-improvement and greed. Many times over the course of world history religion is misconstrued and leads individuals to believe self-interrupted version of its holy text. Two of the most prominent religions in world history Islam and Christianity were used to empower those in high authority. This point is made clear with the documents discussed, and show readers that religion is nothing more than tool for the intellect to take advantage of the common masses of society.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this article Stephen L. Carter expresses the great deal on the separation of church and state. Carter does a very good job at utilizing his rhetorical devices to really make sure we have the information embedded in our heads by the time we have finished the article. He does this job with the help of exemplification to give you multiple examples and leading proof of the separation of the church and state; the application of pathos because religion can sometimes be a touchy subject to some, so it brings out more of an emotional appeal; and, lastly, he utilizes repetition in a very different manner to keep the reader interested but to make it very clear the point he is getting across.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The church aged through the history of the United States like a person growing older every year. Likewise, the church has lost its power with the government as an elderly person can’t participate in the things like they used to. Puritans viewed their government and religion as one. Deist viewed things using logic and reason to separate their government and religion. Transcendentalist viewed that they don’t need a religion; they need to connect with nature spiritually. Throughout the major literary philosophies in the United States, one can see how church and state go from being together to completely separate.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout human history, man has found himself fascinated with the Gods and the mysticism that surrounds them. The idea of praying to a higher power has always appealed to the ethos of mankind, as a way of comfort. Divine intervention has led to the construction of grand temples, churches, and mosques while, the rest of the people lived in shacks battling destitute poverty. Religion has ignored many problems of the human condition in favor of the fantasy of revelation and salvation. It has led to vicious wars, disenfranchisement of entire groups of people all because of the sweet promise of salvation. In John D. Caputo's essay, Caputo highlights the divisive nature of religion and how the promises of revelation and salvation result ultimately lead to further perpetuate the lies and violence that religion has brought…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Religion in much of the world is not in a state of general decline or public evisceration. In contrast, religion is being reshaped, challenged, and in some senses threatened by the processes of emerging late modernity (Brent Plate, 2002). Nation-states, for example, find their sovereignty is being challenged both from below and above, by pervasive alienation from the political process, new courtship rituals, scientific advances…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Liberalism is defined by the desire to minimise the role of the state.’ Discuss (45 marks)…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example of Db Post

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Which is a more Christian form of government, democratic capitalism or democratic socialism? Current history demonstrates that the majority of countries are progressively supporting democratic capitalism along with reduced government involvement (Stapleford, 2009). From a Christian standpoint, Mr. Stapleford writes: “the individual comes first – before the state or the social order” (Stapleford, 2009, p.98). He goes on to say, “Christians are to resist the temptation to use the coercive power of the state to bend society into conformity with our view of the kingdom” (Stapleford, 2009, p.98). Biblically speaking, we are advised not to be wasteful with what we have, and we should be happy to give freely to those in need. Basic guidelines such as these give biblical confirmation to support democratic capitalism (less government involvement), as opposed to democratic socialism with much more government involvement.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between Liberalism and democracy can summed up by Winston Churchill's famous remark, "...democracy is the worst form of Government except all those other forms..." A fear of democracy does runs throughout 19th centrury liberals due to many reasons, one of them being their fear of collective power. On the other hand by the 20th century Democracy became more accepted in liberalism and the fear of democracy no longer remained.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stability within a society is vital. It is what is required for a prosperous economy and a happy population. The source presented states that in order to enhance stability within a society, the government must provide greater opportunities for all people and failure to do so will not serve the common good. This ideology is similar to that of a liberalist society. Liberalism is an ideology that is based around the idea of freedom and equality. Liberal societies provide programs and opportunities to help people succeed in their pursuit to happiness. However, when not taking a liberalist route there has been many different occurrences that would challenge this source and its statement of equality and greater opportunity. Including the failure…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Hague and Harrop(2010, p89), “liberal democracy is a compromise”, liberal democracy makes government obey rules of law. It also equals liberal can limited government, and the final aim is protect citizens have their individual liberty. Whereas, non-liberal democracies are nearly regard as authoritarian and totalitarian. Now following will begin to simple introduction of Cuba and the Unite States.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liberalism and Freedom

    • 2901 Words
    • 12 Pages

    one may ask whether or not the ideas and goals of classical liberalism have been…

    • 2901 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paper

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The place of religion in the public square is a debateable topic. In essence, the dispute centers on the fundamental question: should religious beliefs be excluded from consideration of public policy? That is to say, if society strongly believes that the state should not adopt or implement religious positions, views or policies; to what extent should religious ideologies or concepts be used to publicly support or oppose governmental actions? Or perhaps do religious beliefs and public policy make too dangerous a mixture to even consider? In any vibrant culture, governmental decisions and actions are largely influenced by the public square. Policy-makers discuss, justify and support or oppose public issues in hopes of reaching a consensus in the enforcement of public policy. Liberal thoughts within public debates clash when placed in the same forum as democratic pluralistic societies. Religion, in theory, is a sense of individuality. Thus, to exclude religious beliefs from considerations of public policy would be close to impossible. So is it acceptable for public officials to make decisions grounded in part by religion? This paper asserts that religious beliefs should be excluded from consideration of public policy because; 1) it leads to the ignorance of many religious minorities in the face of dominating religious groups; 2) religious views jeopardize social stability; and finally, 3) it diverges the basis of political decisions from the needs of the public.…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear of Democracy

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some political thinkers have argued that Liberalism can be defined by its fear of democracy. Democracy is ‘rule by the people’, this term suggests that there is popular participation and also public interest within government. While liberals fear democracy they know and see it as the best possible way. As there is a clear fear of it lying underneath the liberal ideology, there are obvious arguments for and against this point. Both have valid indications to say there is and isn’t a fear respectively. However this essay will be looking at both sides, not looking to give a judgement but aiming to establish these for and against arguments.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays