Pros And Cons Of Banning The Box Legislation

Since the 1990s, political activists have demanded that employers delete questions regarding conviction history from their job applications—an effort known as ban the box. Endorsed by presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, this cause has gained significant attention over the past year. Proponents argue that ex-offenders will commit crimes at a lower frequency if they are gainfully employed. Harsh sentencing laws, particularly when it comes to drug offenses, have left nonviolent members of society at an unfair disadvantage when applying for work, and adults should not be continually punished after serving their time. However, many careers require high ethical standards, and companies deserve to know background information about their employees. Research also shows that ban-the-box legislation disproportionately harms minority applicants—without concrete information, managers are more likely to fall victim to stereotypes and prejudices. So, is banning the box a fair, pragmatic measure? Or is it an invitation to discrimination and ignorance?

From personal assistants to chatbots to self-driving cars, recent innovations are increasingly close to displaying artificial intelligence: the ability of
The development of Asia into a prosperous region demands that America forge a stronger relationship with the Chinese government. Negotiating a free trade pact will increase exports, decrease the price of manufactured products, and unlock the world’s largest base of consumers. Despite these benefits, free trade causes high-paying jobs to be offshored. Globalization fosters acculturation in general, and China behaves unethically in specific—instances of currency manipulation and environmental pollution are well-documented. So, would fashioning an agreement with China induce economic growth? Or would it contribute to the plight of American