Pros And Cons Of Cramming

A vast amount of students complain about not getting decent grades; that is attributed to many acts; one of the most poignant ones is cramming. By definition, cramming is the process where a student review high volume of information in a short period of time. This paper argues the inappropriateness of cramming specifically in regards to surface understanding and the use of time.

There are two counter arguments promoting that cramming is an effective method of study. Firstly, students say that cramming allows them to understand the material quickly. Secondly, they say it provides better use of time. This is not true. First of all, saying it allows them to understand the material quickly is absurd because it clearly shows a huge amount of material entering the brain where it cannot be processed properly. Secondly, cramming is not a good use of time implying it creates a waste of
whereas cramming students think they are making a good use of time (which they are not) doing inefficient hobbies and a short-dated amusement, they could have made better use of time doing effective and productive deeds. Surely playing video games and socializing with family and friends are beneficial but, that does not mean to neglect your academic responsibilities such as, tasks, projects and, obviously, quizzes. That is a clear indication that cramming student lack long-term vision. As a consequence, cramming students sense of commitment would be imperceptible which will be a quintessential employment encumbrance.

In conclusion, it is obvious that cramming disadvantages overcome the advantages dramatically. Where cramming suggest irresponsibility, a short-term vision and, most importantly, worse grades. In my opinion, I think cramming is in effective method of study my all means;don't expect being to be characterized by efficiency, commitment and responsibility if you cram for exams because that is genuinely not