Preview

Pros And Cons Of Deterrence Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Deterrence Punishment
When an individual breaks a law, it is only logical that he or she must be punished for their wrong-doing. One of the ways to punish a criminal would be through Deterrence, which is a form of punishment that uses the threat of severe consequences to urge individuals not to break the law. While using this approach, society views criminals as logical people who want to avoid these rash penalties. As we all know, not all criminals are logical. Criminals may be in an unstable state of mind, hence why they would commit the crime. This would be a disadvantage to using deterrence as a form of punishment. If all criminals were logical and would weigh out the pros and cons of breaking the law to realize that it is probably not worth committing, this …show more content…

This approach "protects" society from the criminal by imprisoning them or even executing them. With incapacitation, society views criminals as heinous individuals who would be better off being removed temporarily or even permanently from society. The punishment varies from the crime committed. With a more severe offense, the more time you would remain imprisoned and vice versa. The last form of punishment is rehabilitation, this is when the goal of the punishment is to reform the criminal so they will no longer break laws. With this method, society views the criminal as a person who messed up and needs to change their lives. However, I feel that a prominent disadvantage is that not every criminal will or even wants to change their ways. For some, it could be that they do not have the resources to live comfortably and need to break the law to achieve sustainability. For others, it could be more of a mental problem, and that they do not want to change for the better. People with serious mental issues may even lie about their mental status to try and achieve freedom, just to commit another crime. Whether society views criminals as monsters, children, people who just messed up, or even logical individuals, societal views on criminals will almost always be seen as negative, due to the fact that it is a prominent form of deviance in this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Merriam-Webster, The definition of a double standard is a set of principles that applies differently and usually more rigorously to one group of people or circumstances than to another; especially: a code of morals that applies more severe standards of sexual behavior to women than to men. It’s ironic to me that the definition contains the example of sexual behavior. In Kate Chopin’s story The Storm I see her writing supporting women’s rights and also an example of double standards. Double standards are a huge debate in todays’ society, especially when it comes to sexual behavior. Men and women are biased differently when it comes to number of sexual partners and…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story “An Indian Father’s Plea”, the story shows how culture is oftenly affecting how one views others and the world by showing what Wind-Wolf did as a child before he went to school. For example, throughout the story, the father of Wind-Wolf shares to his teacher what Wind-Wolf was exposed to as a child, “. Because of this, Wind-Wolf’s educational setting was not only a “secure” environment, but it was also very colorful, complicated, sensitive, and diverse.” This can show that the child is exposed to his Native-American culture and later in the story, the father talks what the child does spiritually with his mother and what he experienced in his tribe. “Wind-Wolf was with his mother in South Dakota while she danced for seven days straight…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should a defendant be found guilty an defense counsels job continues as referenced in this slide. If found guilty a defense counsel will present arguments at sentencing to persuade a lighter sentence, or mistakes, although this will not change a guilty verdict, it does however provide the defense and the defendant the opportunity to address the court. It does also allow the prosecution and the victims the right to also address the court to persuade the judge for a stepper sentence. The next step after sentencing is appeals, in most cases of murder a defendant sentenced to life will get with is defense counsel to file appeals, as in the Hettrick…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system has many objectives which it intends to achieve through various punishments. One such objective is to deter social deviants by threatening them with the possibility of facing harsh punishment to pay for their crimes (Ferris & Stein, 2016). The criminal justice system also achieves retribution by responding to crime by retaliating or revenging the crime. The criminal justice system also incapacitates social deviants so as to protect members of the society through imprisonment or execution in some cases. Additionally, the system also intends to rehabilitate criminals so as to encourage them to refrain from socially deviant…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder is defined as the killing of one human being by another. Murderers should receive the death penalty, unless self-defense was a following factor. The killing of an innocent human being should never be something someone gets away with; no one should have to right to live after taking the life of another. However, the death penalty is known to be a “lethal lottery” and is applied at random. Therefore, I believe separate institutions should be constructed throughout the United States to separate average criminals from murderers.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Deterrence or public education. Imposing a penalty for a criminal act is also intended to deter that person from repeating the act. Also, when the penalties are well known and there is public dissemination of penalties for a particular crime, it is expected that others who might contemplate the crime would be deterred from engaging in the prohibited activity.…

    • 388 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory Minimum sentencing usually is defined when a judge is determined to deliver a fixed amount of years in prison to an individual for a convicted crime. Most mandatory minimum sentences apply to drug offenses but it also applies to other crimes, like having an unlicensed gun, fraud, and many others. Mandatory Minimum legislature contributes to the truth that America has a systematic problem in the increase of mass incarceration and men of color are being deprived of their natural rights. The mandatory minimum sentence doesn’t resolve the dilemma of crime. American nonviolent drug offenses should be prosecuted, but Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be eradicated.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By definition, deterrence can mean society’s way of preventing criminal behavior through the act of punishing. Deterrence was noticed by the eighth century. At that time society thought that if anyone was able to think then they would not commit a single crime due to the fact that the punishment would overcome the benefit of the crime committed. With that in mind citizens wouldn’t even think about committing a crime because of the outcome of the punishment. Deterrence was put into place to drop the rise of the death penalty by scaring citizens from doing any crime at all. Today the rate of crime is still on a rise so there are some people that feel this type of punishment isn’t very effective. If criminals were at all afraid of the punishment…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another type of sentence given to a criminal is deterrence and in lamens terms it is the use of punishment as a threat to deter people from offending. Deterrence can be divided into three separate categories. “Specific deterrence, as used in criminal justice, refers to crime prevention achieved through instilling fear in the specific individual being punished such that they refrain from future violation of the law; also referred to as individual deterrence. General deterrence, as used in criminal justice, refers to crime prevention achieved through instilling fear in the general population through the punishment of offenders. Incapacitation is considered by some to be a subset of specific deterrence. Incapacitation aims to prevent future crimes not by rehabilitating…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Multiple studies have shown that stiff punishment acts as a deterrent to criminal behavior. Morgan Reynolds states that, “The reality is that the threat of bad consequences, including retribution posed by the legal system, protects life and property against predation” (3). Basically, criminals often know about the consequences they could face before they actually commit a crime. There is usually a period of time that the…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Larkin, Jr., 2014). This option will also affect the safety of the public. As stated by Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr. (2014), “locking up offenders also incapacitates them for the term of their imprisonment and thereby protects the public”. In addition, the elimination of “mandatory sentences enable communities to conserve scarce enforcement resources without losing any deterrent benefit” (Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr., 2014).…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When criminals were released from prison, most relapsed and continued breaking the law. To correct convicts and potential criminals, the criminal justice system has applied alternative methods…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays