Pros And Cons Of Enforcing The Death Penalty

Enforcing the Death Penalty Murder is defined as the killing of one human being by another. Murderers should receive the death penalty, unless self-defense was a following factor. The killing of an innocent human being should never be something someone gets away with; no one should have to right to live after taking the life of another. However, the death penalty is known to be a “lethal lottery” and is applied at random. Therefore, I believe separate institutions should be constructed throughout the United States to separate average criminals from murderers. The death penalty is quite controversial and often considered, but for serial killers it needs to be considered fair. Author Jennifer Chase states, “Serial killers are not considered
These peoples points that make sense, but I feel as if they are missing the big picture of the real concept of the death penalty. Murderers desperately need to be separate and lined up for the death penalty. For example, by constructing separate institutions schools just might be able to get more money funded to them. Prisons get an enormous amount of money compared to schools. According to writer Katie Lobosco, “States have been slashing funding for higher education over the past decade” and “States budgets for public universities have been cut about 20 percent since 2008”. Lobosco also states “Since 1986, funding for prisons has spiked 141 percent”. My question is why are criminals getting this advantage over schools? Education is far more important than making sure serial killers are comfortable in their cell. Furthermore, the idea of separate institutions could save billions of dollars! If we quit arresting people for nonviolent crimes money could be brought to more important issues and less people would be endangered. Murderers shouldn’t have the right to anything other than a spot in line for their