Preview

Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia
Pros and Cons of Euthanasia
Is mercy killing humane? Do we have the right to assess whether a life is worth living? Should euthanasia be practiced only in the terminally ill people or for the debilitated and mentally ill too? In this write up, we get into the heart of the matter by looking at the pros and cons of euthanasia.
The word euthanasia is derived from the Greek language where 'eu means good' and 'thanasia means death'. Euthanasia also known as mercy killing.

It is a way of painlessly terminating the lives of those who are either suffering from an incurable disease or are in immense pain. This form of assisted suicide is done with the 'humane' motive of easing one's pain and suffering.

Although doctors are put under oath to not be a part of euthanasia, there are some countries that permit this legally. While the practice has been legalized in countries like Belgium, Switzerland, America (Washington and Oregon) and the Netherlands on certain grounds after family consent, it still continues to be an issue of contention in these countries even today.

It is a topic that is sure to have a thousand opinions. It is definitely not an issue to be taken lightly. Let's take a look at the following debate that will help us understand the reasoning for & against mercy killing.

Death with Dignity

Sometimes people mention in their wills, that if they ever get into such a situation where it seems hopeless or too much to bear, that the family should allow him/her to die. Here are some pros to this situation's ethical front.

♦ An individual should have the liberty to choose induced death if he is suffering from an incurable disease where even the best treatment doesn't improve his quality of life.

♦ Legalizing euthanasia would help alleviate suffering in terminally ill patients. It would be inhuman and unfair to make them endure the unbearable pain.

♦ While killing someone in an attempt to defend 'self' is acceptable by law, mercy killing is seen as act that is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that mercy killing is murder, and should not be done. People might say that mercy killing is not fair the victim has no say in whether they live or die. One article against euthanasia states “ the decision allows euthanasia and assisted suicides. but not also psychological suffering without limiting it to clear parameters.(Warren R.M)” Mercy killing is the most humane thing to do for a patient who is in a vegetative state. It would be unfair to make them suffer. “ choosing a pain free death demonstrates an act of love and compassion.(Preiss,…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…

    • 2132 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide also known as “euthanasia” is physician's way hasten one's death. Physician assisted suicide is legal in five of the fifty states in the United States of America. Those states include Oregon, Montana, Washington and Vermont. In order for physician assisted death, a person must to have a terminal illness and have six months or less to live in order for a physician to do the procedure. Physician assisted suicide can be good in one’s eyes, but completely appalling in others.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia has more advantages than disadvantages and actually helps patients and families in numerous ways: it stops the patient from suffering from horrible, chronic diseases and puts an end to their horrific pain. Euthanasia…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to relieve suffering for those with terminal illness, physician assisted suicide should be legalized for competent persons to allow for autonomy in making end of life decisions. In order to reduce or relieve suffering of animals, medically assisted death is a perfectly acceptable practice today. But when it comes to people diagnosed with untreatable and deadly diseases, they are not afforded the same painless luxury. They are at the mercy of their disease and a medical community that fails to recognize a life without dignity is no life at all.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some terminally ill patients are allowed to end their lives by refusing medical treatments; in all fairness, those without that option should be allowed to choose death…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If every individual has, the right to terminate his or her life to avoid suffering that can be regarded as unbearable. If an individual has a right, they are morally permissible to exercise it. Even is there is a disagreement about whether or not this choice is wise or not. That being said, if an individual has the right to die, they would be morally permitted to choose when they would die, even if another considers this choice to be unwise. If everyone has the right to die, then those who experience painful, fatal illness should be able to make the decision to die, before they experience suffering, or before death is an imminent outcome. This notion seems pretty absurd, leading to the conclusion that individuals do not have the right to die and should not be allowed to terminate their life to avoid unbearable suffering.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death with Dignity

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “An individual’s right to choose the time and circumstance of his or her death and/or to seek assistance in facilitating death should be guaranteed and protected by law” ( (Issitt and Newton). The choice of a terminally ill patient to end their life is only legally protected in three states here in the United States: Oregon, Washington and Montana. There are several other countries that allow for “physician-assisted suicide” and in most cases without the restriction of residency- Zurich, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. These countries only offer this assistance to people who are terminally ill and of sound mind.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most doctors can accompany their patients every step of the way, up until the very last. The law stops them helping their patients take the final step, even if that is the patient's ardent last wish. Nations such as the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg have already legalized assisted suicide (Source G), which is carried out directly by a doctor and has shown to have many positive benefits: dignity, autonomy, maintenance of one’s own standards, and should be legalized.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Euthanasia Wrong

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No person deserves to helplessly lay down in agonizing pain. Terminal illnesses reach beyond physical pain and instills patients with mental ailments such as anxiety and fear over their impending death. Tremulous fear sets in as the patient recognizes their inevitable death, but the duration of their pain is unknown. A patient nearing their demise with no hope for recovery should have the choice to willingly end their life with a physician's assistance. Euthanasia would end the suffering and eliminate the fear of when death is going to come.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics