The second pro is that the test results are usually publicly available. This means that parents and guardians of students can see how they are performing on tests and in school. Having the test scores publicly available, makes parents agree with high-stakes testing. It also shows who is ahead and behind in school. “Like an example of Social Darwinism, high-stakes testing separate the good students from the bad ones” (DeWitt, 2014). Another pro is that parents and teachers have noticed is that high-stakes testing improves the student’s test-taking abilities, and the tests do not discriminate. “Information on these tests aren’t geared toward a specific racial, ethnic, or even financial demographic” (Apecses, 2015). The information on the test is the same for all students and is leveled based on their
The second pro is that the test results are usually publicly available. This means that parents and guardians of students can see how they are performing on tests and in school. Having the test scores publicly available, makes parents agree with high-stakes testing. It also shows who is ahead and behind in school. “Like an example of Social Darwinism, high-stakes testing separate the good students from the bad ones” (DeWitt, 2014). Another pro is that parents and teachers have noticed is that high-stakes testing improves the student’s test-taking abilities, and the tests do not discriminate. “Information on these tests aren’t geared toward a specific racial, ethnic, or even financial demographic” (Apecses, 2015). The information on the test is the same for all students and is leveled based on their