Preview

Pros And Cons Of Island Hopping

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
764 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Island Hopping
Until the mid 1942, the Japanese had won an uninterrupted series of victories.They controlled also the pacific islands, after that they had control over the Philippines killing a lot of American Soldiers and as many as 10,000 Filipino soldiers. After some battles the United States took the offensive by using the strategy known as ``island hopping`` and that is how they started getting the Philippines back. After the war won in Europe, the Allies poured their resources to defeat Japan. After gaining some islands, Japan still had 2 million soldiers. They had to choose between invading or something bad. Something bad for them meant a really bad thing made from the United States which was the Atomic Bomb. They chose to fight strongly till the …show more content…
Finally after so many deaths and Japanese emperor made the government to surrender, on September 2, 1945 the formal peace treaty was signed in Missouri. The using of atomic bombs for my opinion I think it was unnecessary because so many people were killed during those explosions, during the explosions at all even after the bombs so many people were killed because of the uranium (radiation) that was realeased when the bomb dropped, and also so many were with other sicknesses and also with trauma 70% of the building is Japan were destroyed and that made the recovery process of Japan not hard but almost impossible. Buildings, people and also a lot of sowing soil were destroyed because of that many people starved to death because they couldn`t even walk on the land that had been touched from the Atomic bombs because of the radiation and also the releasing of some liquids and gases that were realeased on the lands. Also so many smart people that world could use them for very good things for inventing and also to help to raise the economy of some other places and also ruling and making strong nations to help each-other, but still what happened, happened we can`t do nothing about it, but I think it was wrong because so many things that we could have and also so many useful and smart people are not anymore, I think that they should invaded Japan in another way, because I know that Japan made horrible things to innocent people and also that surrendering would be better than fighting but that was not the way to fix it because killing innocent people destroying so many buildings no food no anything that`s not the way that helped even U.S or any other state because not Japan that lost the most was not happy but also the U.S and so many states and some people say that releasing of the two atomic bombs led to the ``COLD WAR`` between the Soviet Union and the U.S which was also a very bad battle which many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. On August 9, 1945, the second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. Thousands died instantaneously while many more died from radiation exposure from the bombs. The use of the atomic weapons was unnecessary due to the fact the Japan’s military was greatly weakened and ready to surrender, thousands of innocent lives were sacrificed simply for political power, and there could have been alternatives to cease the war.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude, in my opinion the first atomic bomb should have been used on Japan to end…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This war did not seem like there would ever be an end until the US decided to unleash their new weapon of mass destruction, the atomic bomb. I feel that the bomb was unnecessary and unjustifiable for a variety of reasons. One reason was the amount of innocent citizens killed or injured due to the bomb. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki which were two highly populated areas at the time.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By dropping the atomic bomb, we were able to put an end to a war that could have continued for many more years. Though there was much controversy over the bomb, Truman, our president at the time, apprised America saying he was quite thankful for it and celebrated the scientific achievements of the minds that created it. America was the first country to create something of this caliber and he wanted us to realize how great it was. The pragmatic decision helped America to establish its military power on a global scale. It is believed that Japan did not believe that we had a weapon that could cause so much destruction, so we had no choice but to show them. The Japanese people do not believe in surrendering, they see it as dishonorable and are…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb was a very good strategic move. The US was able to wipe out a large area of Hiroshima instantly, without killing any of their own men. In addition, they knew that if they used the bomb, they could end the war. On August 15th, Japan announced their surrender after being bombed just weeks beforehand.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason is the Iwo Jima attack. Americans invaded and bombed the japanese island of Iwo Jima. Only 200 japanese survived. In addition, the U.S attacked again Japanese territory: The Okinawa island. This time, about 110,000 people died.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Study Mode

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Additional challenges for HRD professionals are ethical issues such as business scandals, recessions, illegal activities, and government permissions. Another challenge might be implementing new training tools. HRD professionals should understand these needs and develop necessary training programs to meet these needs. Companies have realized that succession planning is a continued and productive process which results in lasting development of their…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard Dawkins Essay

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Dawkins main idea is that, we as ‘survival machines’ are designed to preserve and also designed by selfish genes (Dawkins,1989). In the book he described selfishness as altruism and unconscious purposive behavior. This means that there is no thought behind a gene's action is just genetic. He also describes selfishness as as a behaviour that increases another person's survival of genes in one person at the expense of another (Dawkins,1989). So therefore the genes behavior increases and/or decreases some genes survival. In this book, unlike with Lorenz, he uses genetics to explain this along with economics (Dugan, 2004) . He does this rather than assuming certain things that drive some genes more than others.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with you, Sue violated the patient privacy rights when she viewed and downloaded patient information for her educational use without obtaining permission from the patient. While Sue is working in the COPD clinic, she is only permitted to view the portion of a patient’s medical record that would be necessary for her to do her job. According to Calloway & Venegas, any information that is not needed by the provider to administer care to the patient is protected by The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). (Calloway & Venegas, 2002). The HIPAA law indicates health care is protected if it is not directly needed to provide care, billing, or paying purposes.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays