To re-establish my point, a hero is one who betters the society selflessly, or even at the cost of their own wellbeing; Riel fits seamlessly within said definition. Primarily, Riel is firm in the face of injustices. To clarify, he offers solutions of compromise to the government of how to maintain the interests of both the Metis and the English settlers in peace, however, upon being provoked, he fights back valiantly and with equal force. He is fair, yet does not stand to be pushed around by the commanders. In addition, the Father of Manitoba remains loyal to his people and cause until the very end. With the motives behind the rebellion of protecting the rights of the Metis clear in his mind, Riel is willing to die in the fight for …show more content…
Louis Riel’s efforts of supporting his beliefs and having a vision for a multicultural Canada should be noted. Besides, his supposedly shameful actions could be easily countered. For instance, the government has performed the same deed of silencing Riel and the entire Metis community prior to Scott’s execution. His exile could have been a period Riel had spent to build up more strength and knowledge to further service his people. Finally, must not peace always need to be disturbed at some point another, in order to have positive change to the society? Thanks Louis, for keeping it