Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Wepons

I belive that we should own nuclear wepons. Hoever, I also belive that we shouldn't keep wasing millions of trillions of dollars on them. Our country is very loved, but aslo very hated. With these weapons we can keep us safer and also we can help keep allies safer with advanced weapons. With the amount of nuclear weapons we do have we could blow up the world. It would only take roughly around 200 of these bombs to destroy the largest county in the wrold which is Russia. With the creation of the nukes comes the threat of using them. Only two nuclear weapons have actully been used, both being by the United States during WWII on the Japanesse. After we dropped these bombs we sent shockwaves through the counties, and a new trend of havin nuclear weapns began. Shotly aftermany counties began designing, and making bombs.
I am 100% for nuclear weapons.
With out the threat of nuclear power we have, many counties would gladly be fithing us right now, even if we do have an outstanding navy and army. If they had nuclear weapons and we didn't they would have the upper hand. Which is why I find it important to keep updating and researching new nuclear weapon mehods, but I don't see why we need to spend $1 trillion on them like stated in the passage. "Proposed spending $1 trillion over the next 30 years updating America's nuclear arsena." Why are we wasting so much money on something we have enough on and not soemthing more important like paying back $18 trillion of
dpt?