Pros And Cons Of Zoos

Zoos are like internment camps and should be shut down. Animals deserve the right to live out their lives in their natural habitat, not be the source of human entertainment. Zoos are more detrimental to animals than they are good for them, even though there are conservation efforts and educational purposes for having animals in captivity. The negative aspects far outweigh any positive effects when it comes to having animals in captivity due to poor living conditions, failure to educate, and psychological trauma. Generally, the living conditions in zoos are not ideal, nor do they ever provide sufficient space for the animals. Even under the best circumstances, zoos cannot replicate the habitat the animals have in the wild (peta.org). Animals in
When an animals is seen pacing because they are most likely bored from the confined space they are occupying, visitors just move on to another display were they will hopefully encounter an animal that can do tricks. If anything the failure to educate visitors about the facts of animals in captivity shy away from the fact that wild animals being in zoos is just not good for them. If people knew what happened beyond the few minutes they get to spend with the animals, they probably would not want to go to the zoo. Of course, that would not be advantageous for the zoos because they need the funds and employment. Generally, the exhibits for each animal doesn’t even provide sufficient information about the animal’s natural tendencies. A CAPS study found that forty-one percent of animals on display in UK aquariums had no signs of identification of their species, which is the most basic information (captiveanimals.org). So, not only are visitors not educated but they are oblivious to the life that animals live in