Public Health Consequences Of Legalizing Marijuana
Number ten on the checklist is extra special to me. It states to analyze the source. You must analyze the object and purpose (Buttram, MacMillan III, and Thompson). For the first source, Pros & Cons of Legalizing Marijuana, the purpose is to provide viewers with basic information. The source does not have any references or research to back up its claims. However, the source does compare and list pros and cons in the author’s opinion. The author/s does not go into depth when stating the information. This article is just a light and simple read on Pros and Cons of legalizing marijuana. The second source, The Public Health Consequences of Marijuana Legalization, has an object and purpose of persuading its audience to think against legalizing marijuana.
It lists several different facts that make the legalizing of marijuana look negative. The information is cited with credible sources and the research was defiantly done to back up the claims. The coverage of the information is pretty much done with an outline and does not go into depth. The article was a light read with compacted information. The third credible source, Legalizaion, Decrininalization & Medicinal Use of Cannabis: A Scientific and Public Health Perspective, has an objective to convince the reader of the adverse effects of using marijuana for medical reasons. The adverse effects are put into a negative tone and reflect the idea that marijuana should not be legalized at all. The information is covered in depth and specific areas are taken into depth as well. The author’s back their own claims with research and studies done on cannabis used for medical purposes. The whole paper negatively shows the outcomes of medical marijuana uses. The article is an in depth read for scholars and scientists to assess.
It lists several different facts that make the legalizing of marijuana look negative. The information is cited with credible sources and the research was defiantly done to back up the claims. The coverage of the information is pretty much done with an outline and does not go into depth. The article was a light read with compacted information. The third credible source, Legalizaion, Decrininalization & Medicinal Use of Cannabis: A Scientific and Public Health Perspective, has an objective to convince the reader of the adverse effects of using marijuana for medical reasons. The adverse effects are put into a negative tone and reflect the idea that marijuana should not be legalized at all. The information is covered in depth and specific areas are taken into depth as well. The author’s back their own claims with research and studies done on cannabis used for medical purposes. The whole paper negatively shows the outcomes of medical marijuana uses. The article is an in depth read for scholars and scientists to assess.