Preview

Racism and the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1052 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Racism and the Constitution
The Constitution has often been called a living tribute to the art of compromise. The delegates of the Constitutional Convention came from all over the country. Each individual came with the intention to keep his interests, as well as, the interests of the region they represented secure. These were educated men with considerable wealth, most of which were involved in politics previously. Several of the Constitutional compromises were made in the area of slavery and the terms used are racist. Slave owners did not see slaves as people, instead viewed them as part of their property, therefore not worthy of the rights given to other men and women. Although slavery was starting to be viewed as philosophically wrong, many of the delegates were slave owners themselves.

By the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, slavery in the United States was a widespread reality. In the census of 1790, there were slaves counted in almost every state with the exception of Massachusetts and the districts of Vermont and Maine. The census concluded that of the 3.8 million people that were counted in the United States, 700,000 of them were slaves.

When the Constitutional Convention met, in the 1780's, there was no great movement to abolish slavery. There were opponents of slavery on a philosophical level; however, many Americans believed that slaves were essential for the economy of this new nation to succeed. Prior to the Convention in 1787, many "Founding Fathers" expressed opinions that condemned slavery, however these are the same men who owned slaves themselves.

The Convention had representatives from every corner of the country, including the south, where slavery was most common. Each representative had his own special interests according to the area of the country that he represented, both politically and philosophically. Obviously, these differences of opinion caused a lot of debate during the creation of the Constitution. Compromises had to be made in order for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1787, the Constitutional Convention started in Independence Hall in Philadelphia, PA. The purpose of the convention was to make changes to the Articles of Confederation. The Great Compromise - It was decide that the House of Representatives was to be based on population and Senate would have two members. The three-fifths compromise - each slave was counted as 3/5 of a person in the state’s population. The Commerce and Trade Compromise promised that Congress would not tax exports and could regulate trade. It also was decided that there was a need for separation of power and a system was set up for checks and balances.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This led to the discussion of constructing a stronger central government that could have the ability to provide stability to states during times of rebellion. The US Constitution was drafted after a great deal of compromises on the issues of states representation, direct election, and slavery. The final version created a central government that would have a bimodal legislature, with the senate having equal representation elected from state legislatures and the house having proportional representation elected directly from the people. On the issue of slavery, slaves for the purposes of state representation in the house were considered three-fifths of a white man and importation of new slaves would continue in America for a minimum of another 20 years. In order to give support for ratifying the new Constitution, the federalist, people that supported the new Constitution, promised and later pass a Bill of Rights that protected the rights of US citizens from government…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Constitution was not the only factor leading to sectional tension in America, there are many strong points in the North and South favoring the statement, "By the 1850's the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created."It is known that the union did not last, for there was the Civil War. If the majority of congressional leaders could agree on what the constitution implied, then there probably would not have been a civil war. From several of the documents, there are arguments about what the constitution states. “To the Argument, that the word ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in The Constitution, and therefore it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply, that no such words are continued in the instrument, other words were used, intelligently and specifically, to meet the necessities of slavery.” Ralph Waldo Emerson, address on the fugitive slave law. This indicated the constitution can be interpreted differently, and when used with other pertinent documents, can be incongruous. Those views that differentiated were of those in the North and South.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time of the Civil War, I personally believe the Constitution supported slavery more than it did to oppose it. The opposition of slavery existed, in some forms, among supporters of the Constitution. It seems few though were willing to risk the union for it. The slave states were aware of this and used it as a power in the Convention. In a way, it seemed it was a threat to break up the union. The slave states made it clear that their support for the Constitution was dependent on the absence of any apparent threats it brought to slavery. The slaves were considered property and the constitution protected that. By allowing southern states to count each slave as 3/5’s a person, but also not giving slaves the right to vote, guaranteed that…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution, was it pro-slavery or anti-slavery? People had different viewpoints on slavery and the Constitution and whether or not slavery was divisive and caused sectionalism throughout the country. Frederick Douglas was a free slave and prominent black abolitionist who thought that the Constitution was opposed to slavery but, Jefferson Davis, the president of the confederacy, thought that the Constitution was pro-slavery. However, it can be argued that the Constitution was neither anti-slavery or pro-slavery but at war with itself.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were considered property, which caused a big dispute. If property was counted with the representation other items should’ve been considered as well. If slaves were property they should have be counted with taxation purpose, which would increase the wealth of the south. James Madison had an idea to the amendment to the Articles of Confederation in 1783. Under this compromise, each slave would count as three-fifths of a person both for representation and taxation purposes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The major compromises that were made at the Constitutional Convention were that both of the parties wanted to change the whole document instead of amending the articles. The issues that were settled at this time was creating the senate, and the house. The senate allowed represenation by state, and the house established repersentation by population. Most of the issues that remained unsettled were woman's rights and immigration.…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a consequence of 25 of the 55 convention delegates being slave owners, whether or not slaves should be counted into the state population was up for debate. Following the Great Compromise, the three-fifths compromise was created in order to allow southern states to count each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person. This extra boost in population gave states such as Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina - where a large percentage of their population was slaves - more representation in the House of Representatives so that neither the northern or southern states fully got their way. Another indirect compromise between the Southern and Northern states and the framers of the constitution was the agreement to not allow the word “slave” to be written directly into the constitution. The inclusion of slavery into their constitution would be contradictory to their political ideas of the American Revolution of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution was ratified in 1787 to make a stronger and better central government. Although it was hard to get it ratified, especially in the southern states, it was meant to keep the country together and to be the extreme law of the land. This document, although nearly perfect, did not mention slavery at all, as William Lloyd Garrison states in document B. This, to some extent, caused the nation to rip apart, but it was not the only thing that did. Although some people believe that the constitution caused disunity among the union it was not the constitution itself, but many different factors like the compact theory and slavery which angered either the north or the south.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the biggest issues contested during the Constitutional Convention was the fate of the slave trade. Northern states wanted it abolished largely because of the negotiated three-fifths rule which allowed slaves to be counted toward the number of delegates the House of Representatives would have. Southern representatives rebuked this idea completely and threatened to walk out of the Convention. Since the cooperation of the Southern states was crucial for the creation of a strong federal government, Northern delegates made considerable compromises. These compromises included extending the slave trade until 1808, the prohibition of taxing slave exports, and the implementation of the Fugitive Slave…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern states were concerned that they would lose ability to make decisions regarding slavery. The Constitution included the ⅗ compromise, which allowed the southern states to have more representation in the Electoral College and the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We were to examine our Founder and dig deep into their personal views and trepidations in order to represent them accurately and verbally express their concerns in hopes to help mold the Constitution. The Founder chosen for me was George Read who represented the state of Delaware. Understanding his concerns was not a difficult task, because I too am from Delaware and understand the hardships of growing up in a small state. We had to take into consideration the other states’ views. Some of the larger states had ideologies that differed greatly from those of the smaller states. Objectives of the Southern States contrasted those of the Eastern States. A new national government was the goal of the Convention, but many conflicts arose before a decision and a widely reviewed Constitution could be…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The founding fathers not law slavery outright in the constitution. There are many reasons to explain it. When they made constitution, the American economy was not very good. And the slavers made much money for American government; the economy was depending on slavery.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays