the south would have forever had the power to keep slavery going strong in the south. The 3/5’s compromise was a way to falsely increase the number of votes the slave states would have in the House. The constitution did not challenge the institution of slavery. Purposely avoiding including direct discussion of the issue of slavery was a political issue, not a moral one. The founding fathers of the America seemingly helped protect the practice of slavery in the country.
the south would have forever had the power to keep slavery going strong in the south. The 3/5’s compromise was a way to falsely increase the number of votes the slave states would have in the House. The constitution did not challenge the institution of slavery. Purposely avoiding including direct discussion of the issue of slavery was a political issue, not a moral one. The founding fathers of the America seemingly helped protect the practice of slavery in the country.