Preview

How Did The Constitution Support Slavery

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Constitution Support Slavery
At the time of the Civil War, I personally believe the Constitution supported slavery more than it did to oppose it. The opposition of slavery existed, in some forms, among supporters of the Constitution. It seems few though were willing to risk the union for it. The slave states were aware of this and used it as a power in the Convention. In a way, it seemed it was a threat to break up the union. The slave states made it clear that their support for the Constitution was dependent on the absence of any apparent threats it brought to slavery. The slaves were considered property and the constitution protected that. By allowing southern states to count each slave as 3/5’s a person, but also not giving slaves the right to vote, guaranteed that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I believe that the southern contention to include slaves as part of the representative count is correct and that they should be counted as whole individuals. Given the views and discussions of the time revolving slavery, the south was facing the strong possibility that norther views would have great power in congress, thus threatening southern wealth and way of life. The inclusion of the slave population to protect the interest of the south would give southern suffrage enough voting power to keep the institution in place and maintain the wealth produce by slave labor. Further, since voting is constrained to white males, who most often represent and oversee the business of their households, there can be concession to only levy taxes upon the free populace who have aspirations of wealth and property in exchange for a limitation on how long the slave population can be used as part of representation. I believe the big three states, knowing that the north states were opposed to slavery, slavery abolitionist were demanding more and growing and that the existing…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three reasons why slaves should count in the new Constitution. First of all, it was stated that they should be counted in votes because they were property. Another statement suggested that much of the population in the south was made up of slaves so it wouldn't make sense not to count their votes. Last of all, it was stated that the north would acquire more representatives if they sided with not counting slaves and would have the power to end slavery. In conclusion, there are three main reason as to why slaves should count.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution, was it pro-slavery or anti-slavery? People had different viewpoints on slavery and the Constitution and whether or not slavery was divisive and caused sectionalism throughout the country. Frederick Douglas was a free slave and prominent black abolitionist who thought that the Constitution was opposed to slavery but, Jefferson Davis, the president of the confederacy, thought that the Constitution was pro-slavery. However, it can be argued that the Constitution was neither anti-slavery or pro-slavery but at war with itself.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were considered property, which caused a big dispute. If property was counted with the representation other items should’ve been considered as well. If slaves were property they should have be counted with taxation purpose, which would increase the wealth of the south. James Madison had an idea to the amendment to the Articles of Confederation in 1783. Under this compromise, each slave would count as three-fifths of a person both for representation and taxation purposes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a consequence of 25 of the 55 convention delegates being slave owners, whether or not slaves should be counted into the state population was up for debate. Following the Great Compromise, the three-fifths compromise was created in order to allow southern states to count each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person. This extra boost in population gave states such as Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina - where a large percentage of their population was slaves - more representation in the House of Representatives so that neither the northern or southern states fully got their way. Another indirect compromise between the Southern and Northern states and the framers of the constitution was the agreement to not allow the word “slave” to be written directly into the constitution. The inclusion of slavery into their constitution would be contradictory to their political ideas of the American Revolution of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While most members of the House of Representatives had voted in favor of the amendment, the amendment failed due to a parliamentary technicality. As president, Abraham Lincoln sent the amendment to the states to see what they wanted. However only Ohio and Maryland were the only two states to ratify it. (A Proposed Thirteenth Amendment To Prevent Secession, 1861) With how times have changed and slavery in the United States is only a thing of the past, it would be virtually impossible for this kind of amendment to pass. During the time when that amendment was being proposed, the Southern States still wanted to have more local governments instead of one big government. Slavery was also something that was very big during the time and was what allowed many people to become rich. Eventually however, these things went away and became more liberal. For an amendment of this nature to be proposed, society would need to take a step back and once again follow those…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The old constitution contained flaws that the new constitution filled in. In 1861 slavery was a hard issue to address because the South relies on them so heavily. The southerners could not accept the abolishment of slavery since their mindset was still that the negroes were inferior to white. South was against abolishment of slavery and the North was for abolishment of slavery. When Thomas Jefferson wrote “All men are created equal” even he, himself owned hundreds of slaves. Even though he knew it was wrong to have slaves he ignored that fact and slavery remained. 1861 the President Lincoln’s Inaugural and the Cornerstone speech, was seen by the majority of religious white that believed that the South was in the wrong. Both of these documents were the items needed to make peace throughout the…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is known that the union did not last, for there was the Civil War. If everyone could agree on what the constitution implied, then there probably would not have been a civil war. From several of the documents, there are arguments about what the constitution states. (Document E), “To the Argument, that the word ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in the Constitution, and therefore it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply, that no such words are continued in the instrument, other words were used, intelligently and specifically, to meet the necessities of slavery.” This indicates that the constitution can be interpreted differently, and when used with other documents, it can be incongruous.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution allowed slavery to continue although the declaration of independence claimed “all men were free” , because of every one different opinions and racism.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution allowed slavery to continue even if “all men are created equal” because they profited from the slave;s work, accepted the disagreements to build a strong government, and people saw that building a nation is more…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Fifth Compromises

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ’s right. We know today’s constitution is changed many times, so some way is different with the original constitution. In the original constitution some ways did address slavery but some aspects not mentioned. “Three Fifth compromises” is a clause about the slavery. This clause made slave counted to three fifth human when the voting.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay Civil War

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Civil War was not officially fought over the issue of slavery, but one of the most important outcomes of the war was the emancipation of all slaves in the United States. The reasons for southern states’ secession ranged from unfair duties imposed on the states to the recurring issue of slavery (Document A). This secession unofficially started the war and created great tension between the North and the South. President Lincoln’s main purpose of commencing war was to unite the divided nation, and with tactics such as his Emancipation Proclamation and gaining the Border States’ support he was able to achieve his goal of reunification. Other results yielded by the war were the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution. These provisions formally ended slavery and guaranteed the black freedmen future citizenship and suffrage. The blacks argued that if they fought in the war to preserve the Union that they were entitled to voting and having the same rights as other American citizens (Document C). The Civil Rights Act of 1866 declared that every person born in the United States, without regard to race, color, or previous conditions of slavery or involuntary service, is entitled to citizenship.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we examine these three sections of the Constitution that address slavery, we should be able to identify whether the Constitution was proslavery or antislavery. The first evidence of slavery in the Constitution appears in Article I, Section 2 which is the three-fifths compromise that explains the apportionment of representation and taxation. The three-fifths compromise reads: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an important and crucial development to the United States and Texas. This allowed their economies to grow and fuel the development of these states. However, as states started to join the union, slavery started to decline in the northern United States and increase in the Lower United State including Texas.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays