Preview

Rawls Veil Of Ignorance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rawls Veil Of Ignorance
It is also important to cite Rawls’s conception of the ‘Veil of Ignorance’, which is part of Rawls earlier work. As Ben Rogers point out whilst analysing Rawls’s work, ‘The veil of ignorance is meant to ensure that our views on justice are not distorted by our own interests’ (…). In the case of the Iranian Revolution, it would have been valued if the Islamists would have adopted the veil of ignorance when writing the constitution. As Rawls’s points out, by taking away the elements that makes up a person’s identity, such as ethnicity and religion, the veil of ignorance can lead to principles that ‘specify the kinds of social cooperation that can be entered into and the forms of government that can be established’ (…). Despite the argument of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Now, she says, you must carry yourself with modesty, bow your head in the presence of men, and cover yourself with your shaw. Never look a man in the eye. Never allow yourself to be alone with a man who is not family… Once you are married, she says, you must eat your meal only after your husband has had his fill. Then you may have what remains. If he burps at the end of a meal, it is a sign that you have pleased him. If he turns to you in the night, you must give yourself to him, in the hopes that you will bear him a son… If your husband asks you to wash his feet, you must do as he says, then put a bit of the water in your mouth… This has always been our fate. Simply to endure is to triumph.” (McCormick 15-16)…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States claimed to stand as a beacon of democracy and freedom despite being rife with “racial bigotry” and surrounded in the merciless atmosphere of McCarthyism. It is within these contradictive issues at home that American foreign policy is criticized by the SDS. Noting upon the paradox of “peaceful intentions… contradict[ing] its economic and military investments”, the SDS questions the “national stalemate” of democratic reform within the country and urges for America to bear its concerns homeward rather than in foreign lands. The Port Huron Statement also ushers in the ideology of participatory democracy, which itself is a radical step forward from the conservative decade preceding them; as it moves away from the “tradition bound” America emerging from World War II. The Port Huron Statement raises many concerns with the political system within the 1960’s, but also the fears of a growing democratically warped capitalist state.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “We are wrong to think of democracy as a gift of freedom it is really a kind of discipline that avails freedom.” (Steele 458) Shelby Steele is an author, professor, and well known commentator on race relations. He has a Ph.D. in English, an M.A. in sociology, and has written several books on racial issues. He focuses mostly on race relations and the issues that ensue from racial biased programs. His mother and father were both active in the civil rights movement and the things they did during it made an impression on his values, the article he wrote displays these values. Steele’s article “The New Sovereignty” targets an open minded audience who are under the so called “New Sovereignty” it also targets an open minded nationwide audience who…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The terms defective and incomplete refer to the limitations and extension of rights to in-groups and out-groups. The transformational strategy functions with the notion that this strategy can transform ideas about rights using discourse ethics or a dialectic, focusing on participation, and consensus through rationalization and reasoning. By using a transformational strategy, the dialogic process in which it operates promote change within a country rather than asserting a Western view on said nations, and encouraging unimpeded dialogue. While this strategy seems idealistic (Churchill 96), it is not impossible. By focusing on consensus through reasoning the rights language, regardless of culture, becomes less likely to get dislodged later because it is rooted in the fundamentals of argumentative claims. The transformational strategy can furthermore be successful due to the promotion of an international public forum in which “the society or group justifies the protection of members against standard threats that exemplify fundamental dangers to humans” (Churchill 93). This dialogic process is imperative to the transformational strategy and to achieving a “progressive consensus…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be in full control of a man, dictators must not only enslave his body, but also destroy his mind. A man’s mind and the knowledge that a man has is his most powerful weapon. By depleting the mind of knowledge, a man cannot be in control of his own self and therefore is more easily conquered. In Anthem by Ayn Rand, the leaders and society in her book seek to accomplish control by choosing the jobs for the people, keeping the word “I” unknown, and maintaining a sense of unity from birth.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The slogan War is peace, Freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength may be a paradox, but then again these slogans are also an infallible truth. These paradoxes are the official slogans of the Party, since the slogan was introduced so early in the novel and continues to be said throughout part one of the book this belief serves as the reader’s first introduction to the idea of doublethink.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Thomas Paine’s portrayal of the American Society he characterizes it as a country that upholds its principles, has uncompromising morals, and the rights of its citizens, but Paine neglects to mention that diversity can conjure chaos when two or more conflicting views confront each other.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    De Tocqueville and Mill both cite the possible oppression of minority groups as a significant drawback to democracy. While each author cites the 'tyranny of the majority' as a possible problem, their perceptions of the alleged problem differ in scope and definition. De Tocqueville regards the above mentioned problem largely as a hindrance to actual action on the part of minority groups and individuals; Mill discusses it relating primarily to the oppression of minority thought. De Tocqueville recognizes the ability of the government to regulate thought, but does not focus on it to the extent that Mill does.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohen argues that as a requirement of justice, people must be compensated for their misfortunes that are not derived from choice. Rawls is seen as inconsistent in his theory, as he seems to appeal to the distinction between choice and circumstance, yet his Difference Principle undermines it. However, Rawls never intended for his statements about morally arbitrary factors to have this kind significance. His intention was to provide a clear workable set of principles that could actually be applied in a democratic society. This focus on choice and circumstance distinction is impossible and distracts from what Rawls was attempting to achieve. Rawls realized that natural variances are inevitable but the Difference Principle allows for differences in natural endowments to work to the benefit of all in society. He did not attempt to eliminate the influence that morally arbitrary factors have on distributive shares because by providing people with the social bases of self-respect, the Difference Principle makes it possible to pursue diverse conceptions of the good. Rawls’ theory should be understood as an attempt to devise the most reasonable solutions that could be applied in a…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War Z

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This theme of ignorance shines through in many parts of the book, but one of the key points of it in my mind was the interview Max Brooks had with fictional interviewee, Saladin Kader. This man was ousted from the land he was born and raised in by Kuwait City by his own father. His father didn’t like the way the government was ran to the point where he decided to leave, he wasn’t poor, he wasn’t rich, and they lived a middle-class family life. Of course, since our governments and leaders of such have manipulated our minds, especially those of the young, we, as youth, side with the government. That is all we know, so we believe they are correct by nature. Kader called it “blasphemy” that which his father was doing. He admits in the interview he tried to “convince him with my adolescent logic”. Of course this whole experience stemmed from the main problem in the book, which was the emergence of “zombies”. The father had seen the reawakening of a zombie at the hospital while he was there, and realized the cover up…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clashing Civilization?

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Said argues that collapsing complex, diverse and contradictory groups of people into vast, simplistic groups has disastrous consequences. In Huntington’s original piece, he believes that the Muslim culture is more involved in wars and conflict than any other culture. He also believes that the clash of distinct cultures and civilizations is the potential root cause of the reinvigorated conflicts between nations differing in religious beliefs. Said, on the other hand, feels as though Huntington is using labels, generalizations, and culture assertions as reasoning to his thesis. He states, “Certainly neither Huntington nor Lewis has much time to spare for the internal dynamics and plurality of every civilization; or for considering that the major contest in most modern cultures concerns the definition or interpretation of each culture; or for the unattractive possibility that a great deal of demagogy and downright ignorance is involved in presuming to…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [3] Towards a Just Society A Literacy and Human Rights Educational Resource Reader, 81-82http://peacefulschoolsinternational.org/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=363.0;attach=182(accessed December 8, 2010)…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Areson, utilitarianism is the principle Rawls reputes as the most difficult form and type of teleology, which he describes as a theory that not only expresses the good as independent from the right but states and identifies the right while maximizing the good. Utilitarianism usually is taken as a theory of justice and holds that “society is rightly ordered, and therefore just, when its major institutions are arranged so as to achieve the greatest net balance of satisfaction summed over all the individuals belonging to it”. Rawls argues that utilitarianism discounts the separateness and clearness of persons and does not recognize that justice is what free persons would choose as the principles to order or control their social cooperation under terms and situations that are fair.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both John Rawls and Robert Nozick have made major contributions to modern political philosophy. Rawls’ most successful philosophical work, “A Theory of Justice,” has helped construct both modern liberal and social democratic concepts of social justice. On the other hand, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, Nozick’s most successful philosophical work, constructs a form of libertarianism traditionally associated with John Locke and other philosophers prescribed to individual rights and freedoms. Evidently, both philosophers exhibit two highly distinct political philosophies. One major difference between the two philosophies is the legitimacy of governmental redistribution of wealth. As a result, Rawls and Nozick are at two opposite ends of the political…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays