Preview

Reaction to Convocation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reaction to Convocation
Reaction to Dr. David Callahan

I was prepared to be interested in hearing this person speak, but when he started to list some “facts”, I started to tune out. The one that stood out for me was that, “billions of dollars have been lost for the music industry because of illegal downloading.” If people who downloaded the illegal music actually purchased it, yes- that would be more money in the big wigs pockets. However, many studies have shown (and I read another one on Techcruch right before seeing the speaker) that illegal downloading of music has no effect on the music industry. The real fact is: people who pirate music wouldn’t purchase it to begin with.

He also compared Julia Roberts’ pay per film to Marilyn Monroe’s. Aside from inflation of the last 50 – 60 years, these actresses would never be on the same playing field. During Monroe’s time, Elizabeth Taylor was getting 1 million per film. It’s another case of faulty facts on the speaker’s behalf.

He calls nepotism a form of cheating. I call it catching a break. I think of cheating as doing something that hurts someone else, to put oneself ahead. If he considers nepotism cheating, I wonder what else is on his radar. If a storeowner rounds the dollar down, so he doesn’t have to hand you a fistful of change; is that cheating? It’s not fair to all the other customers that purchase the same product and don’t get the same discount. What is his definition of cheating?

He is more of an idealist than a realist. He has an idea that if we all police ourselves and sign an arbitrary contract to uphold honesty and integrity, the world would be much better. This will NEVER happen. The fact is, we do police ourselves and make our own choices. It’s why we cheat in the first place. It’s what makes us human. It’s much easier to be apathetic and accept the world we live in, than to continuously be disappointed by people not living up to one’s lofty ideals.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    examples does he give to support his argument? Are they effective? Do they withstand the test of time? Can you…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the temporal purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense: and have no other preliminaries to settle with the reader, than that he will divest himself to prejudice and prepossession, and suffer his reason and his feelings to determine for themselves: that he will put on, or rather that he will not put off, the true character of a man, and generously enlarge his views beyond the present days…”…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with him because he wants to bring back the freedom of the people on how humans lived before societies and government existed. He wants to bring back the freedom of humans in which people were really free and friendly. I agree with him because I also believe in what he believes that the only way that people can improve morally and mentally is to come together in societies, in a way that having an organized group of people can improve their morality and mentality. I agree with him because he is also saying that humans should not be enslaved by the government in a way that humans are born with freedom. I agree with…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you agree with his argument? Yes, I agree we should accept the principles of impartiality, universalizability and equality fundamentally forward others.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ishmael Analysis

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He fails on two fronts: the law he presents is empirically false, and even if it were true, it still wouldn't make it possible to know what we should do. At best, it would help us predict the consequences of our actions, but that is not sufficient to derive an ethical system.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This statement was in response to his participation in a non-violent campaign march in a town that still had many problems with segregation. He explains that he was asked there because of organizational ties, and that he was there because of injustice. He also brings up that the demonstrations were in response to a meeting they had previous with city leaders where promises were made and then broken. He goes on to explain the situation and the need for direct action so that it can lead to negotiation. He also brings up an idea that there is a difference in laws and how they are used. This difference is referred to as "just" and "unjust." Laws are unjust depending on if they restrict people unfairly, or if man uses them to restrict other people unfairly. He gives blame to the white moderate who is happy living with a negative peace and not willing to have the disorder to gain a positive peacefulness. He gives examples of injustices in the past, such as Christians being willing to face hungry lions versus submitting to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire. He says that society must, "protect the robbed and punish the robber." He also brings up the example that what Adolf Hitler did in Germany was legal at the time. Just because it was legal, didn't…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His words clarify how his painful experience with religion is akin to his reality of living under the effects of racism. In terms of religion, he feels that it is unnecessary to have fundamental guilt that requires turning to a higher power for forgiveness. In the same way, he cannot comprehend why one must conform to white social standards to live peacefully which eventually causes difficulties in his work…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the time he was a child he was taught that “everything which comes from the many is good. Everything which comes from one is evil” (Pg 85), but as he grows and learns and as he “walks through the forest, [he] is learning to doubt it” (Pg 86). Now, instead of reciting to himself that he must work for the collective he says to himself, “I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet” (Pg 96). He doesn’t want people to live for him and he doesn't want to live for others, he wants to live for himself and himself only. Equality also establishes a new goal for himself in the end which is to become happy as well as free and to pass along these thoughts to the following generations. Equality says that he will “break all the chains of the earth, and raze the cities of the enslaves, and [his] home will become the capital of a world where each man will be free to exist for his own sake”(Pg 104). Equality will fight for human rights and freedom of man until people do exists for their own sake. In conclusion, Equality no longer will work for the collective, he will no longer things he doesn’t want to do, he is now an individual and he will only do things with his free will, and he will make sure all men will one day have that same…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's an egoistic way of thinking, because it asserts that the only goal of any individual human being should be to pursue his own happiness, and not to subordinate his happiness to the service of others. The fact is, in spite of proclaiming himself as a good egoist, he never seems to get over the whole concerning idea of helping others. The thing about him is that even after realizing that his own happiness is all that matters, Equality still…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Society is indeed a contract… a partnership in all art, a particular in every virtue, and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born…”…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    College Essay

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The move Amistad and the story “Interesting Narrative of the life of Olaudah Equiano” have many similarities. The three similarities between the story and Amistad are the ways that the slaves were treated, the conditions of the ships, and the reactions of the slaves. In both the movie and the book slaves had to overcome horrific conditions to be freed, In the movie the main character Cinque was captured sold and thrown onto the Amistad and into the life of slavery but yet he was fought for and he finally made it home, In the story Olaudah finally was also on a slave ship and was sold into slavery.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both Adam Smith and Alexis de Tocqueville agree that an individual is the most qualified to make decisions affecting the sphere of the individual as long as those decisions do not violate the law of justice. > From this starting point, each theorist proposes a role of government and comments on human nature and civil society. Smith focuses on economic liberty and the ways in which government can repress this liberty, to the detriment of society. De Tocqueville emphasizes political liberty and the way that government can be organized to promote political liberty, protect individual liberty, and promote civil liberty.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He has theories and one of his quotes for categorical imperative is “Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (Kant 105). What he argues about his quote is that if you want someone or others to do good, then you first will have to do well to them. You think first before doing your actions, and you begin to do your actions later. One example would be my first year in college. I was still undecided of what major I wanted. I then started thinking if I should just quit school and get a job, or should I stay in school and continue my education. As I asked myself that question, I began to think about the consequences of quitting in school and not quitting. By quitting school, I would have lack of education, and also won’t have a high paying job. If I stay in school and not quit, we then see that by staying in school will result in a better education. I will also get a good job with better payment. I also thought about the influences I would give to my brothers of quitting or not quitting school. There is good and bad for quitting and not quitting school. The point of view that came up to my head was that how each of us create our own universal law. Universal law is your own law and how it can affect everyone around you. So he thinks that by thinking first about anything we want,…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He turns down the notion of psychological egoism. He claim self-interest is always the root of morality…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays