Reiman's Argumentative Essay: Against The Death Penalty
While evil gives us the right to punish the wrongdoer with retribution, does it follow that we should act on this right? Death penalty system is recognized as the world's most severe punishment for offenders because it has a direct denial of the right to live of criminals, and depriving prisoner’s opportunity to go back compensate the victims. Reiman's article "against the death penalty," he begins with a brief summary of his ideas to death the four positions, and then he goes into more detail for each person. The first point he made that: "Although the death penalty is a just punishment for some murderers, it is unfair to punish the perpetrators less stringent (reduced to a certain limit)." In his first premise, he shows how the most accepted
…show more content…
People also believe that the death penalty is a deterrent to criminals, the most powerful weapon to prevent the crime occurred. But the fact is the death penalty compared with other kinds of punishment, the death penalty does not deter crime has a special function. Offenders can be divided into two categories: Impulsive type and plan type. For impulsive, they are in the non-rational state at the time of crime, reckless commission of a crime, the death penalty cannot afford deterrent for them. For the plan type, there are too many elements need priorities than death, such as Benefits available on crime, criminal attitude towards his life and so on. Thus, the deterrent effect of the death penalty not prominent than other kinds of punishment. As some homicide, injury, rape, crimes were mostly due to some conflicts or situations stimulation, so that the loss of reason, impulsive, and at the moment committed a crime. In this case, the perpetrators are often impossible to accurately discretionary legal consequences of his crime may cause. For these people, the death penalty deterrence can be said too late to play. Furthermore, most of these people will regret afterward, in fact, sentenced these people to death runs counter to repentance, even those who escaped will continue to stimulate criminal psychology. According to studies, many murderers have that idea after killed first person: "kill one person is dead, kill more people is dead too, so it's ok to kill more.” So the death penalty maybe is an indirect stimulation of the
People also believe that the death penalty is a deterrent to criminals, the most powerful weapon to prevent the crime occurred. But the fact is the death penalty compared with other kinds of punishment, the death penalty does not deter crime has a special function. Offenders can be divided into two categories: Impulsive type and plan type. For impulsive, they are in the non-rational state at the time of crime, reckless commission of a crime, the death penalty cannot afford deterrent for them. For the plan type, there are too many elements need priorities than death, such as Benefits available on crime, criminal attitude towards his life and so on. Thus, the deterrent effect of the death penalty not prominent than other kinds of punishment. As some homicide, injury, rape, crimes were mostly due to some conflicts or situations stimulation, so that the loss of reason, impulsive, and at the moment committed a crime. In this case, the perpetrators are often impossible to accurately discretionary legal consequences of his crime may cause. For these people, the death penalty deterrence can be said too late to play. Furthermore, most of these people will regret afterward, in fact, sentenced these people to death runs counter to repentance, even those who escaped will continue to stimulate criminal psychology. According to studies, many murderers have that idea after killed first person: "kill one person is dead, kill more people is dead too, so it's ok to kill more.” So the death penalty maybe is an indirect stimulation of the