Preview

Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished In Canada

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished In Canada
On July 14 1976, capital punishment was abolished in Canada. The death penalty has always been and remains a controversial issue in countries all over the world; however because of justice, retribution and deterrence, it is evident that it should be brought back to Canada as a lawful consequence to committing first degree murder.

The foremost important reason for the application of capital punishment is justice. In Canadian law, a first degree murder conviction will result in a sentence of life in prison with no possibility of parole for 25 years. First degree murder is charged for premeditated murder, the murder of a law enforcement officer in their line of duty, or the murder of someone in a course of a sexual assault, kidnapping or forced confinement. This means 25 years after committing an atrocious offence, a murderer could potentially be put back on the streets. This is by no means an adequate punishment for a first degree murder. The death penalty serves better than any other form of punishment, as it ultimately ensures that a criminal can never harm another person again. Execution is the only true form of justice that shows murder is intolerable and will be punished accordingly.
…show more content…

The goal of the law is to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful actions. Murder, being the worst crime to commit should have the worst punishment available to deter it, and that is the death penalty. Studied in the field of behavioural psychology, this harsh punishment is negative reinforcement, meaning to insist on acceptable behaviour to avoid the very negative outcome, death, the thing which we fear the most. Those that are not deterred will not be deterred by anything else. This would deterrence result in fewer murderers, and a decrease in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been formally abolished in Australia. It was last used in 1967, when Ronald Ryan was hanged in Victoria. Prior to his execution, Queensland and New South Wales had already abolished the death penalty for murder. Brenda Hodge became the last person sentenced to death in August 1984. Her sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment and she was paroled in 1995. Between Ryan's execution and 1984, occasional death sentences were passed in Victoria, South Australia, and Western Australia, but were commuted to life imprisonment. In 2010, federal legislation prohibited capital punishment in all Australian states and territories.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patricia Cornwell once said “First of all, it does not deter crime, the death penalty.” So why was it made in the first place? Well, many believe that with this system we can eliminate atrocious criminals such as Timothy McVeigh, a young man who bombed Oklahoma City taking the lives of 168 people, who was later executed. This definitely helps in removing that one criminal, but what about the other thousands? If the death penalty were enforced in Canada then it not only do so but also increase our taxes, put innocent lives at risk, and in all reality have no effect on murder rates. Why would you want to let such a problematic sentencing be legalized in such a fine country like ours.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, I think capital punishment is immoral and Canada should not reinstate the death penalty. The death penalty is unethical and doesn’t speak for the morals Canadians hold so close to their hearts, and the decision to reinstate it would create a huge negative impact on foreign relations around the world. Canada is a strong advocate toward fighting injustice and for human rights, and if we decided to reinstate it, countries would highly condemn that decision and would leave Canada out of important discussions to create a more equal and just world. In addition, the death penalty costs governments around the world a massive amount of money. For example, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, taxpayers in the state of California paid over 4 billion dollars for the death penalty since it was reinstated in the state in 1978.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As violence becomes an increasing concern among Canadians, people are calling for the reinstatement of capital punishment. This controversial issue has been ailing politicians and public morality since its abolition in 1976. As one examines the arguments for and against the reinstatement of capital punishment; examples of modern day cases dealing with capital punishment including wrongful convictions, the uncertainty of death penalty 's role as a deterrent for crime and the cost, one can better appreciate the reasons why this barbaric form of punishment should remain in the past.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The intention of Canada’s Sentencing law of abolishing the death penalty to life imprisonment was to create the fixture of humanity. In this paper, I want to examine that the death penalty should not be reinstituted within the Canadian society. Canadian legislators are trying to treasure an appropriate balance between individual wishes being satisfied and the states obligation to secure the prosperity of society. The policy of this state of removing the death penalty should be attempted to be removed everywhere. The overview of this paper will be based upon an Auto-Ethnography method of research. I will examine the role of representing the process of how the death penalty was abolished and why it should be that way in a qualitative research,…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is the Permissible authorisation of executing someone who has committed an atrocious, unforgiveable and inhumane crime. The death penalty was removed from Great Britain in 1964-1965, however some countries, for example; China, Iran, North Korea and some states in the USA, still practice the use of the death penalty. Acts such as; genocide and general murders commonly result in the criminal offender being placed on death row. Some legal execution methods would be: Lethal injection or electric chair. In my opinion I believe the death penalty is an illogical, unreasonable and an absurd punishing system, and shouldn’t be re introduced into the UK. I am going to explain why below.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you know how many people die in Canada every year . Over 500 people die from Murder every year. This is a very high rate since Canada's population is very small. The capital punishment of death penalty has a very clear connection with homicide rates. I think the death penalty should be legal in Canada. Since so many people are getting murdered and so many heinous criminals have the courage to kill someone they should get a taste of their own medicine and should be killed as brutally as they killed their victim. The death penalty should also be legal because it's cheaper than keeping people in prison for 25 years . It also gives fear to people who would want to commit heinous crimes because they will…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty In Canada

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Should Canada reinstate the death penalty for murder? Reinstituting the death penalty is not optional. If Canada wishes to prosper and flourish under God's blessing, we must reintroduce the death penalty. The foremost reason for the death penalty is God's mandate. Other reasons include the practical deterrent that the death penalty constitutes and, as a comparatively minor reason, the economic sensibility. I would also argue that the death penalty still applies to crimes other than murder and that our current penitentiary system is unnecessary and unbiblical.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Has it ever occurred to you that in this country you can be executed for a crime you didn’t commit, even if the method of killing you is expensive and completely unconstitutional? The government believes that this is the correct way to punish those who have committed horrific crimes. Is this really the best option? I don’t think so. As a citizen of this country, this system of “justice” appals me. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because it is unconstitutional, comes at a great cost, and is otherwise ineffective at carrying out its intended purpose.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    George Bernard Shaw once said, “Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another out but similar that breed their kind” (quoted in Costanzo 95). This shows why the act of the death penalty is not a deterrence to future criminals. If an individual truly feels the need to harm someone else, he/she will do it regardless of the consequences. By putting a murderer to death the, law is killing people, an act they are trying to deter people from.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who support the death penalty would argue that the death penalty deters people from murder because they are scared of being sentenced to death. It might scare some people, but the vast majority of murders would kill anyway, for most murders are not rationalizing their actions. Also, according to some being sentenced to life is a worse punishment than the death penalty for death would put them out of their misery. The life sentence is just as bad as a death sentence, so why have the death penalty at all? The death penalty is not beneficial. It only creates problems.…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays