Preview

Reliability and Validity of Interview in Research

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reliability and Validity of Interview in Research
Q1: What is the meaning of Reliability and validity in research context?
Ans: Reliability Reliability in research means that an instrument yields the same results again and again on every trial. There may be difference in the results; therefore we use more and less reliable instrument for a specific research. A more reliable instrument is often called as stable instrument (that instrument which gives same or very closer results) where as less reliable instrument is often called unstable instrument (that gives different results on every trial).
Reliability of an instrument = More same results of an instrument trialed every time
Joppe (2000) defines reliability as:
“…The extent to which results are consistent over time and an accurate representation of the total population under study is referred to as reliability and if the results of a study can be reproduced under a similar methodology, then the research instrument is considered to be reliable.” Joppe, M. (2000). The Research Process. Retrieved February 25, 1998.

Validity
Validity in research context refers to the extent to which a test measures what we actually wish to measure. In other words validity means the results of a research instrument relates to our criteria. When the results and criterion are unrelated then the instrument is invalid, and should not be used in research further.
Validity = relatedness of results with what we wish to observe
Joppe (2000) defines validity as:
“Validity determines whether the research truly measures that which it was intended to measure or how truthful the research results are. In other words, does the research instrument allow you to hit "the bull’s eye" of your research object? Researchers generally determine validity by asking a series of questions, and will often look for the answers in the research of others.” Joppe, M. (2000). The Research Process. Retrieved February 25, 1998.

Bibliography Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding



Bibliography: Willian B. Werther & Keith Davis. Human Resources and Personnel Management. McGraw-Hill.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Validity is the extent to which a test measures what we actually wish to measure.…

    • 529 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rlt2 Task 4

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Characteristics of research determine the outcome of the research. It reflect on the quality of the research.…

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 11.4

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Validity is the extent to which a test measures what we actually wish to measure” (Cooper and Schindler, 2014, p.257). “Reliability has to do with the accuracy and precision of a measurement procedure” (Cooper and Schindler, 2014, p. 257). Validity is more critical to measurement than reliability because without validity, reliability is meaningless. For example, a bathroom scale may give a weight each time a person weighs themselves, which proves the scale is reliable in giving feedback. If the scale displays an incorrect weight each time then it is not a valid weight and a person cannot accurately measure themselves to know if a goal is being met or not. Validity and reliability can also be thought of in terms of a person and their work. A person may show up to work on time and complete all tasks that are required everyday, which proves they are reliable, however if they tasks are not completed correctly then there is no validity to work and it must be redone. Finally, validity…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nu310 Unit 4

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What evidence does the report provide that the analysis is accurate and appropriate? Were data displayed in a manner that allows you to verify the researcher's conclusions? (4…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reliability can be explained as the consistency of scores over time. Assessments are usually reliable when you get the same results regardless of when the assessment is taken or who does the scoring. On the other hand, Validity indicates how well an assessment actually measures what it is supposed to measure. Every assessment requires students to complete some task or activity and the validity of the task should reflect some knowledge or performance, and be consistent with current educational theory and practice. The quality of the assessment should be reliable because you would think that teachers thought carefully about the assessment before giving it to their students.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reliability refers to the consistency, such as questionnaires or scales to assess how fearful a person is about something. Reliability of questionnaires or scales can be measured in terms of whether the test items are consistent, which is called test-retest reliability. Another way of assessing reliability is whether two independent assessors give similar scores, which is called inter-rater reliability. Test re-test refers to how consistent results are when the specific interview/questionnaire is repeated.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we are looking at the validity of something it means we are measuring what we are claiming to measure, and if we are looking at the reliability of something it means if we repeat the process over and over we should always get the same if not very similar results.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    measurements. It is sometimes the case that researchers are unable to find an appropriate way of…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Craig 2

    • 332 Words
    • 1 Page

    Validity is a method that produces data that gives a true or genuine picture of what something is really like; this helps the researcher easily find out the truth. The use of qualitative methods such as Participant Observation give a more truthful account, due to the method being able to provide us with a deeper insight through first-hand experience as argued by sociologists.…

    • 332 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Validity and reliability are the backbone of what is accepted as scientific proof by researchers. Potential challenges to reliability of a research question, data, and analyses are any significant results must be repeatable. Anyone who wanted to perform the same experiment applying the same conditions should arrive at the same result. If this is successful this reinforces the results and makes a larger population accept hypothesis. Potential challenges to validity of a research question, data, and analysis is making sure whether research actually measures what it claims to measure. If someone else who looked at the research and questions if the research really measures what it supposed to, the research results are in danger of being null and void and research findings wouldn't carry weight. Potential challenges to validity and reliability of data and analysis is making sure data is reliable in the first place before any test is applied. Any misconstrue data or oversight from beginning will leave false data entered in the statistical hypothesis test that would not produce accurate results. Challenges to validity of data, and analyses are meeting requirements of the scientific research method. Following all requirements and proper procedures when gather information, chosen right population and sample sizes, and any other requirements when using method. Accurate interpretation of data is a potential challenge to reliability of data. If the research results are not interpreted correctly this leads to a cloudy analysis because data is not appropriately examined according to research…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nurse Family Validity

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Casual validity is the secret of success in internal validity. Internal validity consists in threats or the type of criticisms evaluators obtain when they study the program outcomes. Threats to validity have three classifications. First, single group threats refer to the criticism, when evaluators study a group that receives the program. Second, multiple groups threats involve criticism regarding several groups in the investigation. Third, social threats to internal validity discuss social research…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assessment

    • 6420 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Reliable – If the assessment was carried out by a different assessor, in a different place, the results would be consistent.…

    • 6420 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interviews are a face to face conservation (generally between two people or a group), usually involving a set of questions. There are two types of interviews; unstructured and structured. In addition, there are other types of interviews known as a semi-structured interview.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Validity relates to whether an instrument measures what it intends to measure, and the degree of confidence that the user can have in the results obtained when using the instrument (Corr and Siddons 2005)…

    • 4150 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    A validity scale is designed to measure a type of response style which may affect the overall validity of interpreted test data (Cohen, Swerdlik, & Sturman, 2013). A validity scale can be thought of as a subscale of a test which can assist in making judgments about the honesty, dishonesty, or level of understanding a test taker displays when taking a test. In addition,…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays