Preview

Religion in the workplace

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
505 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Religion in the workplace
RELIGION IN THE WORKPLACE

Religion is protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by allowing people who work for an employer to be able to ask or take time off in order to observe a religious holiday or attend services. It also forbids employers to discharge, discriminate, limit or segregate any employee based off of their religious preferences. According to what is stated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employees are allowed to take that time off of work for religious reasons as long as the employer does not experience any kind of hardship due to the absence of the employee. If a business does not comply with what the law states they can receive up to $1,000.00 fine, one year in jail or possibly both.
Some examples of religious accommodations qualified employers must take are:
1. Providing tuition reimbursement even if it is a specific religion course.
2. Allowing employees not to participate in training sessions due to their religion.
3. Employees are allowed to engage in any religious expression.
4. Allowing flexible scheduling around someone’s religious preferences.
5. Providing time and or place to pray.
It is important for employers to understand how religion is protected by Title VII because if they fail to comply they can receive hefty fines and possibly jail time. An employer can also be sued by someone if they fail to allow them to express their religious preferences. As for employees it is definitely necessary for them to know about Title VI when it comes to religion. Knowing this information will allow an individual to express their religious rights inside the workplace and not feel threatened because they might believe differently than others.

COMING TO AMERICA

The group that I choose to talk about is Muslims. This group faces religious discrimination in this country today and has seen an increase of discrimination after September 11th. People assume that because some radical terrorists created 9/11 that all people from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In contrast to this case, there are cases where religion is favored over cooperation. In one example EEOC v. Red Robin, where Red Robin was against an employee with two tattoos of verses on his wrist. They told him that if he did not cover up his tattoos, he would not be able to serve. Red Robin argued in part that the employee had standards that the tattoos conflicted with the companies’ family image. The only evidence that Red Robin had against these tattoos was a statement saying that they “seek to represent a family-orientated and kid friendly image (Flake).” But since there was no evidence to point that the customers complained about the tattoos. In the end the employee was paid by Red Robins $150,000. More cases are building up over this…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 3

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ms. Riyadh believes she is being discriminated against for religious beliefs and gender discrimination. In this Title VII discrimination case Ms. Riyadh will have to establish a Prima Facie Case proving religious and gender or sex discrimination. The company (ABC) will have the burden of proof of proving their failure to promote Ms. Riyadh to a higher position is not related to her religion or her sex. Ms. Riyadh has to prove she was intentionally discriminated against due to said reasons.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JDT2 Task 1

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin. When an employer engages in practices that create a hostile work environment for any of these protected groups, making conditions so intolerable that an employee feels compelled to resign, it is known as constructive discharge Former employee Andy Anderson now alleges that our company engaged in religious discrimination when our production schedule changes went into effect at the first of the year. The changes required all production employees to occasionally work on a religious holy day, and Mr. Anderson has submitted a constructive discharge claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).…

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rjdt Task-1

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Given that the employee has resigned as a result of being required to work on a religious holy day, the following Supreme Court case law applies: In Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Hardinson, (1977), the United States Supreme Court ruled that as long as the plaintiff (Hardinson) held legitimate religious beliefs concerning the performance of labor on a religious holy day and providing that the plaintiff had made a documentable effort to bring this conflict to the attention of his employer, the employer was required to accommodate the religious beliefs of the employee. The Court further held that requiring the employee to work on a religious holy day did in fact amount to constructive discharge as the employer had not made any reasonable efforts to accommodate the religious beliefs of the employee.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Memo for Task 1

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Barrett, D. (2012, December 29). Christians have no rights to refuse to work on Sundays, says Judge. The Telegraph. [Co.]. p.1 Civil Rights Act (1964). Retrieved from www.ourdocuments.gov on April 23, 2013. Constructive Discharge. Retrieved from www.tislaw.com on April 20, 2013. Digest of EEO Law. Retrieved from www.eeoc.gov on April 20, 2013. Employment Law. Retrieved from www.about.com on April 20, 2013. Mesritz, George D. (Spring 1996; 21,4; ABI/INFORM). Employee Relations Law Journal p.9 Martin Tepper v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General. (6th Circuit Court, 2007). David A. Goldmeier and Terry C. Goldmeier v. Allstate Insurance Company. (6th Circuit Court, 2003). Constructive Discharge. Retrieved from US Legal at www.uslegal.com on April 19, 2013.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law specifically addresses discrimination in the workplace. The case presented relates specifically to section 703 which states it is unlawful to discriminate against an individuals race, color, religion, sex, or national origin ("Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964",2013). The employee is claiming the company was in violation of this section by scheduling him to work on his religious holy day. Yet, the question remains as to whether the company intentionally violated the employee 's religious rights by changing shifts, or was it in response to business growth and…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Resources Task 1 V2

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages

    References: Cromwell, J. B. (1997). Cultural Discrimination: The Reasonable Accommodation of Religion in the Workplace. Employee Responsibility and Rights, 10(2), 155-172.…

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wgu Human Resources Task 1

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The employee is stating they were discriminated on because of religion because they now have to work on religious holy days due to the new work schedule. According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, religion is defined as all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business. ("Title VII," “n.d.”, p. 2). The employee claims that the toy Company did indeed create an intolerable working condition due to the requirement to work on a religious holy…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Rights Act of 1964

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII provides guidance to the definition of discrimination. The Act provides protection for employees from unlawful employment practices. One of these is the discrimination on basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In this case the employee is being forced to work on their religious holy day. The other case here has to do with singling out a particular job class for change in shift policy. The production team is the only team to change their shift schedule to work on weekends while the office staff maintains their schedule of Monday to Friday employment. Here the employee is not only discriminated on religion but is also segregated by the job classification to change their shift schedule.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constructive Discharge

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is unlawful if an employer discriminates against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. (Title VII of The Civil Rights Act, 1964). Title VII clearly states that “an employer has a duty to reasonably accommodate its employee’s religious beliefs as long as the accommodation is not an undue hardship.” "Accommodations" include allowing employees to have flexible schedules for religious holidays; however it also says that an employer has the right to refuse accommodation if doing so would pose an unnecessary burden on the employer.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Resources Task 1

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. X states that since we have gone to the four day rotational schedule, his religious beliefs are being infringed upon since he would have to work on his religious “holy day”. According to U.S. law, the company does have an obligation to accommodate Mr. X’s request. The law requires an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee 's religious beliefs or practices, unless doing so would cause difficulty or expense for the employer. (EEOC, 2012).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations 2003-This makes it illegal to discriminate on basis of religious beliefs.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion in the workplace

    • 703 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “A Gallup poll states that 90% of American adults say that religion is either very important or fairly important in their lives”(n.d.). 90 percent is a very big majority, who in some form or fashion would appreciate the opportunity to be able to practice their religious beliefs when necessary. Employers cannot…

    • 703 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays