The discoveries of the Renaissance did not make a significant contribution to the improvement of medical treatment for many reasons. The first of these reasons is that the discoveries made during these times were about anatomy - not treatment. Vesalius dissected bodies in order to prove that many of the works that Galen - the ancient Greek who had formed the basis for modern medical teachings - had produced, were in fact wrong. Also Harvey who proved that the heart acts as a pump, pumping blood around the body left some of his work unproven for instance the discovery of the capillaries. Both these scientists were also strongly opposed …show more content…
throughout almost a thousand years in the medieval period people where only taught the works of Galen for they believed Galen based this works on the belief of a higher power, i.e. God. so for many years he was the only source of medical knowledge. No one dared oppose the church for the power they held over society until the church lost power medical remained the same. So Harvey and Vesalius were so strongly opposed because they could both proved Galen wrong, such as Vesalius proved that Galen was wrong because he proved that we have one jaw were as Galen believed we had two because his dissection was on apes who have two. He also proved that the kidneys are the same height. He was also able to prove the church wrong when they claimed that men had less ribs than woman because in Genesis God removed one of Adams ribs to create Eve. Vesalius proved his theory's through public dissection but this also limited his work because people frowned upon the dissection of the dead body. However this works were proved but still shunned due to the churches power. Harvey was able to prove Galen wrong for Galen believed that the blood was made by the liver were as Harvey proved that the heart pumped the same blood around the body. He faced the same difficulties even when this theory's were proven therefore limiting there effect on