Preview

Republicans Vs Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
917 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Republicans Vs Federalists
The American Revolution was a momentous moment in the history of the United States as it gave rise to various political groups with differing beliefs as to how to construct a stable government. The two major political factions, notably the Republicans and the Federalists, debated over a multitude of policies between 1801 and 1825 that ultimately shaped American society. The policies pursued by the Republican presidents, such as Thomas Jefferson, differed from those implemented by Hamilton and other Federalists as they were literal interpretations of the Constitution and focused on establishing an American republic with limited powers. The events leading up to the creation of the Constitution greatly magnified the differing ideas and policies …show more content…
In a time of increasing desire for a stronger national government, Republican views upheld their fear that state governments would lose power, that the Constitution lacked individual rights, and that the government would be run by wealthy men. However, Alexander Hamilton, a leading Federalist, intended to strengthen the national government by promoting various economic policies. His three reports to Congress, notably the reports on public credit, the national bank, and manufacturers, generally attempted to increase public credit, establish the first bank of the country, and raise reasonable taxes in order to pay off debts and create a strong and …show more content…
These policies were directly opposed by Republican leaders such as Jefferson, who called his plans “unconstitutional.” Hamilton’s economic policies were a form of loose interpretation of the constitutional clause “necessary and proper”, whereas the Republican’s views espoused a stricter view. This differing view of the meaning of the Constitution further led to Federalist attempts to shun their opposing party through policies that were deemed unconstitutional. The Naturalization Act, Alien Act, and Sedition Act attempted to thwart Republicans from becoming citizens and inhibited the public spread of Republican ideas that opposed those of the Federalists. Despite these suppressive Federalist policies, Jefferson’s term of presidency intended to lead the country on a different path; he viewed the yeomen farming families, people who work and live on the land in which they own, as the future power and voice of America and subsequently, implemented various policies that characterized a Republican type of government. Whereas Federalist ideas viewed expansion of land as potentially dangerous, Jefferson championed ideas of westward expansion by purchasing the enormous Louisiana Territory from France’s leader Napoleon Bonaparte, which encouraged southern farmers to migrate from the south and seek out new fertile lands. In addition to his endeavor to expand into the west, he directly went against Federalist ideas of a stronger national government by actually

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was a limited-government Democrat-Republican. While in office, Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory. This purchase, which stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains, empowered the nation government and posed a major philosophical problem for Jefferson. Jefferson believed that all powers of the National Government were enumerated and…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    i. Jefferson’s Louisiana purchase was a “loose” interpretation of the Constitution when he was known to be very strict with policies…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase is seen as a loose construction conclusion. Since the constitution does not state that the president can buy foreign land, Jefferson was not following the constitution when he made this decision. Jefferson submitted the agreement with France to the senate and after the republican majority ratified the purchase, the Louisiana territory was officially the United States. Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase benefitted the United States…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the nation had to be taken seriously, it had to pay of its debts most of which had come from war. Create a national debt; Hamilton wanted to create new interest bearing bonds hoping to give the rich people a stake in our nations success. Create a bank of the United States; This bank would be private and it would turn a profit for its shareholders but it would hold public funds and issue notes that would circulate as currency. A whiskey Tax; Americans liked to drinks and a way to raise money was to set an excise tax on whisky which might reduce drinking or cause people to switch to beer. This would hurt small farmers. Encourage domestic industrial manufacturing by imposing a…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Thomas Jefferson became president, he began to change his view on economics drastically. Jefferson and Madison, both republicans, talked about limited government. However when they served as President, both men excersized powers not granted in the constitution. Jefferson originially believed that the country would never exist in harmony as long as the Federalists supported ideas not stated in the Constitution. (A) Despite this, Jefferson purchased large amounts of western land from France in the Lousiana Purchase without senates approval. The Federalists believed this…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson came from different backgrounds, which shaped their thoughts and ideas for opposing views on the economy. Jefferson wanted to reduce debt by making the government smaller, and Hamilton wanted to pay off the debts of the states as well as the government’s debt to create a stable economic system for the United States. Hamilton proposed the federal government take over the debt the state governments had accumulated during the Revolution. Jefferson was worried that this would threaten the Republic. “They allowed southern votes to shift to support Hamilton’s plan for assumption of the state debts.”…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purchasing the land from Napoleon expanded the land tremendously. Unfortunately, it brought about immense conflict with Indian tribes. Although Jefferson had a large impact in his presidency, Hamilton had a better idea for the future, as he foresaw the need for a growing commercial and industrial society.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From 1789 to 1799, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were powerful leaders who had contrasting views on how government should run. This time period was known as the Federalist Era. Leading up to this era was rebellion, the American Revolution, and the Critical Period. Rebellion broke out in the colonies after the colonists were fed up with being taxed without representation. This cry for freedom eventually lead to the American Revolution. The colonists vanquished the British and freed the United States from their tyrannical ways. Though they were free, the United States had to set up a way to govern the people. After the failure of The Articles of Confederation, a Constitutional Convention was held. The delegates were able to leave the…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He wanted France’s territory that was in the west but they didn’t have the funding to do so. Regardless he was bestowed the offer of this land and he was willing to pay $10 million dollars. Napoleon refused the “low of payment” so he raised it to $15 million dollars. They took his offer and sent America into a downward spiral. Regarding document four, Jefferson stated that he bought present day Arkansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, most of Colorado, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, as well as big parts of Texas, North Dakota, Minnesota, and Louisiana. Generally people think more is better and the more land we have the more powerful we can be but Hamilton produced the truth about these lands. In document five, Hamilton exclaimed that those territories are completely unexplored and overflowing with Indian tribes. If we only have people occupying 1/16th of our current land then what are they going to do with the new…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question #2: Using the respective arguments of the Jeffersonians and the Federalists, take a position arguing that either “strict construction” or the “elastic clause” is the most protective of the rights of Americans.…

    • 381 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays