Research Paper On Chivalry

In the modern world, the topic of chivalry is approached with caution. Chivalry is seen as a sign to women of weakness and that they are incapable of handling things on their own. On the other hand, chivalry is expected of men to consider them gentleman-like figures. Both statements contradict each other, but are the social norm within the context of society. The original form of chivalry is declining, but the expectation of respect between the genders is stronger than ever. The way chivalry was demonstrated thousands of years ago has dramatically changed in the new era. Therefore, the original chivalry from long ago is met with complete opposition. A new form of respect has taken its place. Chivalry has officially died and needs to be brought back to life.
The pride and protectiveness of a spouse has turned to “overbearing” and “clingy”, and chivalry has turned to “the male superiority demonstration” and “old fashioned.” These values are demonized and are needed in our society for balance. With modern feminists clinging to the notion of equal treatment for women, the argument of how chivalry degrades women is on the front lines. These notions reject the positive reflection of chivalry and the respect that is conjugated through these actions. Chivalry should be resurrected if the values represent what feminists desire. Therefore, the question is raised: Why are feminists fighting something that promotes respect? In the article concerning the revival of chivalry, Emily Esfahani Smith discusses the real intention behind chivalry. “Chivalry, as a social idea, was about respecting and aggrandizing women, and recognizing that their attention was worth seeking, competing for, and holding (Smith).” With the true meaning out in the open, the issue evolves in the way chivalry is demonstrated and less about the gender