Preview

Restatement

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Restatement
RST (3d) of the Law Governing Lawyers

§ 20 A Lawyer's Duty to Inform and Consult with a Client

(1) A lawyer must keep a client reasonably informed about the matter and must consult with a client to a reasonable extent concerning decisions to be made by the lawyer under §§ 21-23.
(2) A lawyer must promptly comply with a client's reasonable requests for information.
(3) A lawyer must notify a client of decisions to be made by the client under §§ 21-23 and must explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

§ 21 Allocating the Authority to Decide Between a Client and a Lawyer

As between client and lawyer:
(1) A client and lawyer may agree which of them will make specified decisions, subject to the requirements stated in §§ 18, 19, 22, 23, and other provisions of this Restatement. The agreement may be superseded by another valid agreement.
(2) A client may instruct a lawyer during the representation, subject to the requirements stated in §§ 22, 23, and other provisions of this Restatement.
(3) Subject to Subsections (1) and (2) a lawyer may take any lawful measure within the scope of representation that is reasonably calculated to advance a client's objectives as defined by the client, consulting with the client as required by § 20.
(4) A client may ratify an act of a lawyer that was not previously authorized.

§ 22 Authority Reserved to a Client

(1) As between client and lawyer, subject to Subsection (2) and § 23, the following and comparable decisions are reserved to the client except when the client has validly authorized the lawyer to make the particular decision: whether and on what terms to settle a claim; how a criminal defendant should plead; whether a criminal defendant should waive jury trial; whether a criminal defendant should testify; and whether to appeal in a civil proceeding or criminal prosecution.
(2) A client may not validly authorize a lawyer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hu Vs Fang Case Study

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    RULE: A [legal professional] shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client unless the client consents after consultation, except for disclosures that are impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, and except as stated in paragraph…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clients and Witnesses are key factors in a legal cause. However the roles they play and how the legal team deals with them during the overall case, are drastically different.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    apollo shoes case study 4

    • 2736 Words
    • 11 Pages

    8. Obtain written client representations regarding pledge, discount, or assignment of receivables, and about receivables from officers, directors, affiliates, or other related parties.…

    • 2736 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule 1.9 includes the duties to former clients, and after the termination of a client-lawyer relationship, a lawyer has certain continuing duties with respect to confidentiality and conflicts of interest and thus may not represent another client except in conformity with this Rule. (ABA, n.d) The provisions of this Rule are for the protection of former clients and can be waived if the client gives informed consent. This rule is important for lawyers because they still have an obligation of confidentiality to their former clients, and the lawyer cannot reveal anything the former client had said unless the client gives consent to do so. The former client cannot be an example for the new client, and cannot be treated the same as the former client was.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Week 2 Threats

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The counsel helping the victim what is the maximum benefit come from his case. He advice the victim if this settlement will be reasonable or he pursues litigation. Counsel give advise for the victim about his right by the law. Without counsel the victim can avoid many benefit about his case the law give the…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen assignment draft

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prof'l Conduct, R 1.6(b)(3) and shall do so “to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The benefits that counsel should provide in helping a victim to pursue litigation or not is to make the client fully aware of the chances of successful litigation. Counsel’s opinion should be based on case history as well as the experience of the counsel with similar cases. The client should be fully educated by counsel of the chances of litigation being either successful or unsuccessful based on the facts of the claim.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communication between the case manager and client needs to be clear in order to achieve any goal. The case manager would need to actively listen to the client and the client would need to be express his/her desires so both can review what needs to be done and find the…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A client does have attorney-client privilege when information is given to a paralegal. The only requirement is that the paralegal must keep the information confidential and not reveal it to anybody unless the client specifies otherwise…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question #4. Why do lawyers in civil litigation rely upon the members of a legal team?…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Interoffice Memo

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As you can see in points number one (1) and two (2), we are legally obligated to follow through with notice if the client is potentially…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    attorney-client privelge

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For my first contention, there is no benefit to the secrey requiremtnet within attorney- client privilege. It does not encourage honesty and candor. This requiremtn of confidentially limits application of the prveleg and provides a theoretical brightline for determining when the privelege’s protection begins and ends. By guaranteeing that privileged communicaions between an attorney and client, the assumption underlying the priveleg is that the client will be encouraged to be more forthright with his attorney. These enhanced discloures to the attorney will make it possible for the attorney to give more accurate advice, which will increase the clients understanding of and compliance with legal responsibiites. If we allow truth-seeking not to occur, then there is more…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example of Irac

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first relevant ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) is Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information). Rule 1.6(a) prohibits a lawyer from revealing information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by (b) where a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary. The second RPC to be considered is Rule 1.16 (Declining or Terminating Representation). Rule 1.16(a)(1) prohibits the continuing representation of a client when the representation will result in a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Finally, we must consider RPC is Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal). Rule 3.3(a), (b) and (c) prohibit a lawyer from making a false statement of material fact or law to a court and from failing to disclose a material fact necessary to avoid assisting the client in a criminal or fraudulent act. Rule 3.3(c) also prohibits a lawyer from knowingly offering false evidence.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is Paralegal Polly’s obligation to know and follow the rules and regulations put forth by the State Board. The rules are said and stated for Board approved attorneys permitted to practice law. However, all employees under the supervising attorney are obligated to follow the same regulations and rules laid down by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Therefore the supervising attorney for Paralegal Polly is reliable for the actions that he takes. If Paralegal Polly answers any of his friends questions with anything that could be considered legal advice he is committing UPL.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Considerations As a Dietetic Practitioner Ethical considerations are vital to businesses to help create an understanding of boundaries and aid in decision making. As a dietetics practitioner communicates with coworkers and clients, one is essentially representing the company. To understand the importance of ethics, one must first understand situations when a code of ethics is needed.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays