Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Revision Compare and Contrast

Good Essays
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Revision Compare and Contrast
Thomas Barrett
AP Lang. & Comp.

My view on revision and on the writing process is the same as Murray’s. He begins by saying that the beginning of the writing process is by making a first draft. I agree on that because of what I learned on the writing process, being first draft, peer edit, second draft, and so on. He then continues by saying the first draft is like an opportunity to some writers to find out what they have to say and how to say it. I agree on this as well because the first draft of a paper is to find out what you know and what to say to make a strong, valid point. In paragraph four, he starts to talk about how writers are their own best enemy. Writers must accept the criticism and praise of others but be suspicious of it. He says that Writers cannot depend on others. Although in my view, that the review of others are of big importance to the writers because they take notes of how their paper would respond to the public, I also agree that the writer has to detach himself from their own pages so they can put their care and craft into the page.

He continues in paragraph nine that most readers, especially to student writers, will underestimate the amount of rewriting that goes through in a paper. Student writers would only see the finished product and often ignore the in depth craft that went into it. To me, writing is about many mistakes in the beginning, to multiple changes in between each and every review, to the final end of publishing. Murray quotes Anthony Burgess admitting "By the time I'm nearing the end of a story, the first part will have been reread and altered and corrected at least 150 times." Papers will at times go through a lot of editing and its important for writers to understand.

Lastly, he talks about how writers need to listen to their voices. I agree that a writer's voice is what makes the authority of their writings and papers. Without the voice of the writer, then a paper wouldn’t have much to talk about. Voice is what puts the words together, what is “in between the lines”. Voice is what a reader notices and how they get the message the writer put out.

In conclusion, Murray’s view and practice on writing is a similar way I write my own. I use his practice of first draft writing, editing, and voicing. To me, those are important aspects and tools in writing, which is why I say that his views and practices coincide with my own.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In elementary and middle school, we were all taught to write first drafts before writing our final copies. Teachers would tell us it is important to take the time to write and organize our thoughts and ideas before writing a final copy. I would never complete this step. I was usually one of the students that would spend my time writing to just get the writing done. Then, I would look over it quickly and correct only few parts. My “first draft” would usually end up being my final draft. I have never enjoyed writing and have never really liked my own writing. My writing was never the one talked about by teachers or ever given a good grade. I would never bother fixing my first draft because I never thought I could make it into a good quality paper. Lamott describes a brilliant writer sitting down and writing a polished piece of work in one sitting and then goes on to explain how that never happens. I found that really comforting because that is how I imagined many people writing. Now I know that is usually not how it happens. This made me realize that good writing just takes time. Some people might be better writers than others, but the way Lamott describes writing makes it seem that anyone can become good writer. I just need to take the time to write out my ideas to form an awful first draft that can later be revised into a “terrific” final…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this child’s draft of just visions and impulsive thoughts, she lets it all gush out and let it slope all over the place, thinking that only yourself are going to see it and shape the draft later. After cutting out lines and phrases that she doesn’t need, she would continue on to rewriting a better second draft. She used to write food reviews for a California magazine; from there, the writer learned a lot that food reviewing was not only typing and commenting on the food but it also need a clear structure of explanation. Lastly, Lamott tells readers that this whole rough drafts process is just a persisting cycle, and it will soon happen again. If I use some of these techniques that Lamott mentioned in this paper, then maybe I can begin to have some comfort when writing my first draft and to create wonderful pieces of art that are out of my potential. No matter how “shitty” the first copy may be,…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anne Lamott Summary

    • 341 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the book Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott, she writes an excerpt, Shitty First Drafts, which is about the impact and importance of the first drafts of writing. Anne explains in the beginning of this excerpt that all writers write shitty first drafts and the drafts get better as you write more and work on the writing more. Lamott claims that “writing is not rapturous,” she explains that the only way that she can write anything well is to write a very bad first draft and just work on fixing that. She explains that sometimes you just have to type and get your ideas written out to be able to write a good piece of work. Once someone has been writing for so long, they have to have the ability to be able to just trust their writing process and understand that the first draft isn’t going to be perfect. Nothing is perfect on the first try, you have to keep working at it. Sometimes the first draft will be the worst thing someone thinks they have ever written, but they just have to go back to it and try to make it better and revise what is wrong. A writer has to start somewhere and they work from there. Just because the first draft is a bad draft doesn’t mean that the final work will be terrible. The first draft is the terrible draft, the second draft is the slightly better draft that has been picked through lightly to better, and the final draft is the “dental draft.” The dental draft is the draft that you really pick through and make sure that everything is perfect. In other words, the final product is checked “dentally” to make sure that it is “healthy” so that the final product is perfect. Lamott’s entire excerpt is just explaining that whether or not your first draft is perfect or not, the final product will definitely be better and more acceptable.…

    • 341 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Shitty First Drafts,” a selection from Bird by Bird (1994), Anne Lamott claims that in order to write effectively it is necessary to just get a first draft written down, no matter how crappy it may be. She does this by disproving the assumption that great authors just sit down and magically spit out an amazing piece of work and by sharing her own experience writing awful first drafts. Ms. Lamott, an accomplished author, shared her experiences in order to demonstrate how all readers need to write that abhorrent first draft. She is writing to other, less-experienced writers to reassure them, and to help them become better writers.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald M. Murray’s 1973 essay titled “The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts”, closely analyzes writers and their meticulous attention to detail present in all their works. He invites the reader into the world of an accomplished author and the mindset behind someone who has had a piece of their writing published for millions to see. The intended audience for this article is the aspiring student or author who’s interested in learning more about the world he may soon step into. Knowing this, Murray starts off the essay without any of the traditional expected fluff and instead brashly informs the reader of the difference between an expert author and one such as the reader.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Harris’ essay “Revising” (2006 pg.452-69); serves as a guide in how to correctly revise any writing you have ever completed. Harris designates four points that must be taken under consideration while revising. Before getting to the core of his argument, Harris notes that revising is not the same as editing. The essay points out that students are trained too just polish and make their writing sleeker rather than making a difference or significant change to the original. From there Harris brings up his first point stating that the author must decide what exactly it is that they are trying to convey. Harris believes the problem stems from that fact that many writers focus too much on correcting mistakes without thinking of what it is they…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Shitty First Drafts”, Anne Lamott discusses the topic of writing what inspires the brain for a first draft is a valuable approach to compose a paper. Anne confesses specialized writers even await a response for a hint at writing their next scoop. However, when the writer has first attempt to begin writing perfection they experience dread and edginess. This is what the writers need to write the best they can. In order to wind up with great second drafts and phenomenal third drafts, fruitful authors should upchuck out their thoughts on paper. Stated by Anne, the first draft is called the “Childs draft” a mess of words only for one’s eyes. Subsequent to backpedaling and modifying the first draft, start to structure and adjust…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harvard graduate Nancy Sommers wrote Between the Drafts in February 1992. In many papers, a person is able to tell the direction of the paper within the first paragraph. However in Sommers article, the thesis does not appear until the end. Sommer’s thesis is “It is the thrill of the pull between someone else’s authority and our own, between submission and independence that we must discover how to define ourselves” (31). She uses her own personal experience to demonstrate that when writing how easy it is to lose sight of one’s own voice while trying to follow formal procedure. Sommer presents a good argument because she uses her own experiences in the beginning which readers lose sight of what the papers truly about. Through the course of her argument Sommers uses her personal life, methods of teaching and college…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "It is not what an author says, but what he or she whispers, that is important."…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    his use of first person throughout the article, engage the reader and creates a mutual…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anne Lamott’s “Shitty First Drafts” presents an argument to eliminate the understanding that writers create a masterpiece on their first drafts. The first draft is simply the first attempt that writers create to turn their thoughts into a final paper. Lamott tries to convince the “uninitiated” that everyone writes “shitty first drafts” and often times, positive outcomes come from those first attempts. One of the biggest obstacle in writing is the fear of creating terrible paper and many writers do not realize that this is actually the most important part to a good article. Lamott provided an effective rhetorical situation because of her persuasive appeals and structure.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Questions 2, Pg 33 #2: What do we learn about the author as we read this essay? How does his use of language reveal not only humor, but also the author's persona? How would you describe it?…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, the majority of books that I’ve published have taken just about ten years to produce and revise. An article takes about two months— when you have the time that is— writing about four pages a day.” Warhol’s approach to creating and revising her composition begins by creating an idea draft, then proceeding to create the outline that she uses to construct her first draft— believing in the philosophy of “revising as you go.” As Warhol revises her work, she begins to share her article with others to get her first round of feedback. After the first round of feedback, Warhol goes through another round of revision on the entire manuscript, combing through every sentence as she works. After the second round of revisions are complete, Warhol sends her manuscript to the editor to undergo a round of peer review. Once she has received the notes from the peer review, Warhol performs her final round of revision before she submits her work to be…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 11 ]. Bennett, A. and Royle, N. An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory (4th Ed.) (Harlow: Pearson, 2009) p.39.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The overall thesis of Lamott’s essay is about the drafting process, or more particularly the process of writing a first draft. In regard to the overall tone throughout the essay; Lamott’s tone striked me as being dry, sarcastic, and humorous, which made it much more enjoyable to read. In addition, I also think that Lamott was suggesting that the process of writing a first draft is more important than the final product, which I completely agree with. For example, when I write my first drafts I tend to “free write” and zip through it, not caring for grammatical correctness until I feel I have written enough. Although, I sometimes stop to gawk by how horrible my first drafts are, although this is probably due to my compulsive…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics