In regards to plot development, this seemingly minor note of cicadas actually foreshadows Socrates, as G. R. F. Ferrari notes, to “forget his intention simply to listen to a speech” and inspire him to “deliver speeches himself, and speeches of unusual intensity at that” (3). As the whole of the work is through conversation, the only insight the reader has is through what Socrates and Phaedrus directly describe. Interestingly, the Phaedrus’ fixation on setting is what distinguishes it from many of Plato’s other dialogues, as the background goes beyond its usual function as a set piece: Ferrari believes “it becomes a prominent topic of discussion and a direct cause of the conversational action rather than, as one would expect, at
In regards to plot development, this seemingly minor note of cicadas actually foreshadows Socrates, as G. R. F. Ferrari notes, to “forget his intention simply to listen to a speech” and inspire him to “deliver speeches himself, and speeches of unusual intensity at that” (3). As the whole of the work is through conversation, the only insight the reader has is through what Socrates and Phaedrus directly describe. Interestingly, the Phaedrus’ fixation on setting is what distinguishes it from many of Plato’s other dialogues, as the background goes beyond its usual function as a set piece: Ferrari believes “it becomes a prominent topic of discussion and a direct cause of the conversational action rather than, as one would expect, at