Chavez uses logos in his argument about nonviolent resistance and talks about how using violence is a waste of human live while talking about no one has the right to take away other right to live. Chavez also uses metaphors to compare things like “When victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached”. Chavez uses these in his article to create an argument about nonviolent resistance and what his opinion is on them. Nonviolent resistance is a big factor in today's society as much as it was back during the civil rights movement. BLM movement and other protest groups still use nonviolent resistance against the police and whoever they are protesting against. Chavez uses rhetorical choices that writers in nonviolent resistance groups still use in articles and even in their protests. …show more content…
Chavez talks about how Gandhi taught people that boycott’s are the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change. Gandhi an expert of nonviolent resistance is a great example of Chavez using logos in writing because Gandhi is an expert so people reading will know what he is talking about when Gandhi is brought up. Logic brought up by Chavez is that human life is very special and no one has the right to take is away from someone no matter how just it is. People can relate to the piece of logic because of freedom and right to live. BLM movement also has that same idea about police officer shooting unarmed teens in the inter