Preview

Role Of Mandamus In Criminal Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role Of Mandamus In Criminal Law
WRITS IN INDIA
 mandamus
The purpose of mandamus is to remedy defects of justice. It lies in the cases where there is a specific right but no specific legal remedy for enforcing that right. It also lies in cases where there is an alternative remedy but the mode of redress is less convenient, less beneficial or less effectual. Generally, it is not available in anticipation of any injury except when the petitioner is likely to be affected by an official act in contravention of a statutory duty or where an illegal or unconstitutional order is made. The grant of mandamus is therefore an equitable remedy; a matter for the discretion of the court, the exercise of which is governed by well-settled principles.
There are three kinds of mandamus:
…show more content…
Peremptory Mandamus: An absolute and unqualified command to the defendant to do the act in question. It is issued when the defendant defaults on, or fails to show sufficient cause in answer to, an alternative mandamus.
3. Continuing Mandamus: A Mandamus issued to a lower authority in general public interest asking the officer or the authority to perform its tasks expeditiously for an unstipulated period of time for preventing miscarriage of justice.
Habeas corpus
Habeas corpus (Latin meaning "you have the body") is a writ, or legal action, through which a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention. The remedy can be sought by the prisoner or by another person coming to his aid. Habeas corpus originated in the English legal system, but it is now available in many nations. It has historically been an important legal instrument safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary state action.
 Writ of prohibition
A writ of prohibition is a writ directing a subordinate to stop doing something that they may not do, according to law, but are doing. In practice, the Court directs the Clerk to issue the Writ, and directs the Sheriff to serve it on the subordinate, and the Clerk prepares the Writ and gives it to the Sheriff, who serves

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Directed verdict: a ruling by a trial judge taking a case from the jury b/c the evidence will permit only one reasonable verdict (after trial)…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The act to establish judicial review authorizes the supreme court to “issue writs of mandamus in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law to any courts appointed by persons holding office under the authority of the United States . The secretary of state…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reasoning: Congress cannot expand the Supreme Court’s power past Article three, and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In New Jersey, “Prior to the adoption of the 1947 Constitution, ‘persons aggrieved by action or inaction of … administrative agencies could seek judicial relief by applying for one of the prerogative writs – certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition.” Jeffery S. Mandel, New Jersey Appellate Practice 141 (GANN, 2008). However, such writs were abolished by the 1947 Constitution in an attempt to simplify the procedure with regard to prerogative writs. Id. at 142. At that time, prerogative writs were superseded and consolidated into one action, now called actions “in lieu of prerogative writs.” Id.; 19 N.J. Prac., Skills And Methods § 4:1, § 4:2 (Rev. 3d ed.).…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of this decision, Marshall is left with a very important question “. . . whether Marbury had a remedy for the deprivation of the right [commission]” (249). The Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the use of writs of mandamus. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was limited and was not given on the cases of a mandamus. The only way the Supreme Court could use a mandamus was if the Congress gave them power where the constitution did not; or if “the action for mandamus in the Supreme Court was not in the commencement of an original proceeding but a form of appeal from the official against whom the writ was being sought”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was through these facts that Marbury brought a case before the supreme court challenging the validity of the actions by Madison in the refusal of complete the commission process. In filing Marbury sought Writ of mandamus that could compel state secretary Madison to execute the commission process. The writ mandamus forces a state office to complete a ministerial act as it is recognized by law and not individual…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tasoff Case Summary

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasonably foreseeable victims were brought to the forefront by cases such as Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California and subsequent duty to warn cases. Foreseeable means that a “reasonable anticipation of the possible results of an action” exists (Foreseeability. (n.d.)).…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, what is habeas corpus? According to Cornell University Law School, Habeas corpus is a writ that is used to bring an individual who has been convicted of a crime in a state court to the federal court system. Writs of habeas corpus are typically used to review the legality of the person’s arrest, imprisonment, or holding (Cornell University Law School, 2015). In today’s society, writs of habeas corpus are mainly used after a conviction in an attempt to prove that the convicted individual was unjustly and illegally detained or imprisoned. Writs of habeas corpus have other uses as well that…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The term habeas corpus which is Latin for you have the body have reference to the writ of inquiring into the lawfulness of a person who is detained the guardian of an inmate to transport that inmate in front the court and justify the details for his or her incarceration. A court order of habeas corpus is a test to the lawfulness of an inmate custody and does not require an investigation into the inmate’s guiltiness or their innocence. Once the court has finished the details for imprisonment the court the inmate or return the inmate into confinement. The use of the habeas corpus has origins in English communal law dating back to the 14th century and became a part England’s legislative law in 1679. The American colonial courts distributed the writ at common law, and state governments remain to understand the rights of habeas corpus following liberty. In 1807 the Supreme Court acclaimed that the municipal courts could not give habeas corpus to inmates that were being held by the state and or local government because Congress could not grant that kind of power.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison brief

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Court ruled that while writ of mandamus was the correct judicial means to order an official of the United States to do something required of him by law (in this case, deliver a commission), upon closer examination of the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court provided by the Judiciary act of 1789 (specifically, Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that authorizes the Supreme Court to issue writ of mandamus) the Court decided that it is in conflict with Article III of the Constitution. Court ruled that Congress does not…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    haebus corpus

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A writ of '''' is a writ that requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. The principle of habeas corpus ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detentionthat is, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. The remedy can be sought by the prisoner or by another person coming to the prisoner's aid. This right originated in the English legal system, and is now available in many nations. It has historically been an important legal instrument safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary state action.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The term habeas corpus was first used in England in the 14th century, but didn’t become official until the 1679 Habeas Corpus Act was passed in Great Britain. Prior to the Revolutionary War, British soldiers were holding colonist without allowing them to exercise their right of habeas corpus. This was one reason that sparked the Revolutionary War. As a result, the founding fathers of America added habeas corpus to The Constitution of the United States, saying that "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" (Article 1, Section 9) (The Columbia Encyclopedia. 2011, p.1). To this day, citizens that have been charged with a crime enjoy the right of habeas corpus, usually in federal appeals. Habeas Corpus protects the civil liberty of citizens, as it assures them a chance to be heard by the highest court in the land. In contemporary America, as it relates to the war on terror, habeas corpus has been suspended in some cases, especially…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court first contemplated whether Marbury has a right to the commission that he wants delivered to him. The Marshall Court established that, since his commission is for a legal position, and not for a political one, the Executive branch does not have the power to terminate it without violating his vested right to the position. As his right has indeed been violated, the court decided that the laws of the United States and judicial system need to provide him a solution it is the duty of the judicial branch to do so. The court also states that since an officer has indeed infringed up on the right of an individual, a mandamus is a valid remedy to consider.…

    • 776 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * A. Right of the governor to suspend the operation of a Royal decree or order relative in the Philippines if in his opinion, the sads order or decree would not be beneficial to the administration of the country.…

    • 3045 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays