Role Of Narmada Bachao Andolan
NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN
A case study is basically designed to illustrate a more general principle (Nisbet and Watt 1984), it is ‘the study of an instance in action’ (Adelman et al. 1980) .After 1947 their were investigations to evaluate the use of water from Narmada River ,due to sharing of water and interstate differences in implementing schemes made Narmada river dispute. Tribunal was constituted by the Government of India ,they investigated on this matter and gave a response after more than ten years and as per the tribunal's decision ,30 major,135 medium,3000 small dam and the raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam were granted approval . in 1985 Medha Patkar visited the project site and she noticed that the people were not …show more content…
So the court made a mechanism to monitor the progress of resettelment Pari Passu with raising the heights of the dam through GRA authority. The decision in the document which was given in the year 2000 reffred to completing the project and to attain full envisaged benifits, in which the final line that the court stated to order state was" Every endeavour shall be made to see that the project is completed as expeditiously as possible".( "Judgment by the Supreme Court of India". Supreme Court of India, Justice Information System. Archived from the original on 2008-03-03. Retrieved 2008-04-05.) From last 15 years the fight of Narmada river against the Sardar Sarovar Project has been the most visibel and immediate goal of struggle. But the struggle has been rooted in a sight for a society based on equity self living and reliance.Thus the term Sangharsh aur Navnirman ( struggle and Reconstruction)have been two essential components of the Andolan. Some of the praposal intiated by NBA has been succesfully practised like the water harvesting in Rajesthan and even in Gujrat. In 1993 it Ironically, happned that the Bank’s withdrawal from the
A case study is basically designed to illustrate a more general principle (Nisbet and Watt 1984), it is ‘the study of an instance in action’ (Adelman et al. 1980) .After 1947 their were investigations to evaluate the use of water from Narmada River ,due to sharing of water and interstate differences in implementing schemes made Narmada river dispute. Tribunal was constituted by the Government of India ,they investigated on this matter and gave a response after more than ten years and as per the tribunal's decision ,30 major,135 medium,3000 small dam and the raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam were granted approval . in 1985 Medha Patkar visited the project site and she noticed that the people were not …show more content…
So the court made a mechanism to monitor the progress of resettelment Pari Passu with raising the heights of the dam through GRA authority. The decision in the document which was given in the year 2000 reffred to completing the project and to attain full envisaged benifits, in which the final line that the court stated to order state was" Every endeavour shall be made to see that the project is completed as expeditiously as possible".( "Judgment by the Supreme Court of India". Supreme Court of India, Justice Information System. Archived from the original on 2008-03-03. Retrieved 2008-04-05.) From last 15 years the fight of Narmada river against the Sardar Sarovar Project has been the most visibel and immediate goal of struggle. But the struggle has been rooted in a sight for a society based on equity self living and reliance.Thus the term Sangharsh aur Navnirman ( struggle and Reconstruction)have been two essential components of the Andolan. Some of the praposal intiated by NBA has been succesfully practised like the water harvesting in Rajesthan and even in Gujrat. In 1993 it Ironically, happned that the Bank’s withdrawal from the