Preview

Roman And Elizabethan Weapons Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman And Elizabethan Weapons Essay
Ancient Roman and Elizabethan Weapons and Warfare
Both the Elizabethan England and Ancient Roman had powerful armies but with different styles. With Elizabethan England army has their medieval weapons and Ancient Roman having their defensive weapons they were able to conquer much territory as well as be feared. A sword and a spear were the main weapons of Roman soldier. Skill in fencing during the Elizabethan era was a requirement of all upper class. The Ancient Roman was based on its strong military power. The English warfare periods laid the foundations of modern English military power. The Roman military regime was one of the strongest because of their superior weapons. “Some of the Ancient Roman weapons were helmets, body amour,
…show more content…
Elizabethan weapons were the battle ace, the mace, dagger, lanes, arbalest, basilar, bill, bill hock, caltrop, melbera, longbow, and some other weapons (Elizabethan weapons). “The different types of swords ranged from the smallest broadsword measuring 30 inches to the great swords which measured up to 72 inches”(Elizabethan weapons). “There were archers in the militia and some military theorist still preferred the bow to the gun” (Elizabethan weapons). Elizabethan had good weapons to use in warfare. The Roma army was open-minded in adopting the war tactics and also the weapons of their enemies on warfare. “The Roman army could afford to lose experienced legionnaires where as if a new legionnaire came through a battle alive he would be blooded and experienced and valuable addition to the army”(Roman warfare). “The most important fighting unit of the Roman army was the legion commanded by a legatos, this consisted of between 5000 to 6000 legionaries”(Roman warfare). “500 to 600 legionnaires made up a cohort while between 80 to 100 soldiers were a century commanded by a centurion” (Roman warfare). The Roman army developed fighting techniques that were linked to a ferocious training

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Weapons What were the most popular weapons chosen by knights in medieval England 1066-1500? How were the major weapons used in Medieval England 1066 - 1500? The Sword, Long Handled Battle Axe, Spear, Lance, Shield and Mace.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First lets talk about the Roman army and how it was structured and organized. The Roman army was divided up into legions; with the soldiers being know as legionaries. Each legion was made up of 10 cohorts, with a normal cohort contained 480 soldiers. The first cohort in every legion was larger than the other coherts, which was made up of…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance is known as a period of advancements in trade and art and as a time where people of different backgrounds gathered together, clashing overall ways of life. One aspect that is often overlooked, however, is the effect the Renaissance had on the clashing of swords. Before the Renaissance, soldiers stood on opposites ends of each other and charged like barbarians with swords and sticks, or whatever they could scrounge together to fight. The Renaissance brought a change to the literal concept of how battles were fought. The movement away from barbaric types of warfare and towards more refined ways of fighting is demonstrated through several contributing three key facets. The factors that led to significant military advances for Europe during the Renaissance were the movement towards swifter, more durable ships that could defend themselves on the high seas and the creations that derived from gunpowder, and how it made the military weapons used before it obsolete. Ultimately, the most significant military advancement of the European Renaissance is how the Reformation created the…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being an honorable, courageous and bold soldier is regarded as having Roman warlike virtues and following the Roman warrior code. Bret and Kate McKay believed that ‘manliness meant living a life of virtue’ in ancient Rome. Furthermore they explain that virtue refers to having ‘masculine strength’. Volumnia would “rather have eleven [sons] die nobly” than one son enjoy a peaceful life, this shows that fighting in a war was regarded as nobility and superiority, and shows it is more acceptable in Rome to fight in war than to be a noncombatant. Rome is a very violent society – they valued military prowess.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Technology Dbq

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evidence was presented to support the idea that the Romans utilized their technology only for its beauty and aesthetics which embodies some negatives and positives . Almost all of the documents had positive…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weapons In The Crusades

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Next, weapons evolved throughout the process of the crusades. Just as the people developed armor throughout the medieval time period surrounding the crusades, knights began to use more effective and dangerous weapons in combat with their enemy. Two different types of weapons were used during the Crusades: close combat weapons such as swords, maces, spears, and poleaxes, but also long distance weapons such as long bows and crossbows. Blacksmiths softened iron and then shaped the metal into customized weights, lengths, widths, and also shape for both swords and spears. Bows would be used for long distance attack and could be used on foot or on horseback. During the Crusades, the archers with long bows would line up and fire over city walls…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabethan Government

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Elizabethan government has its similarities and differences with the US government now. First, the courts of the Elizabethan era are very different from the US branches today. Secondly, crime and punishment was not as enforced in the Elizabethan era as it is today in the US. Third, the branches of the US government contradict the ideas of the Elizabethan monarchy.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Elizabethan era is a golden age in English history because England had a stable government during this time period. The Elizabethan government structure was highly centralized. The monarchy, the Privy Council, and Parliament were the three bodies of the National government of England in…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bayonets, and swords were not always used as a primary weapon, but they often came in handy for hand to hand combat and low ammunition situations. Some of the popular swords used in the Civil War include the Model 1832 Foot Artillery Sword, Model 1832 Dragoon Saber, Model 1840 Light Artillery Saber, and the Model 1840 Army Noncommissioned Officers’ Sword.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important things the Civil War was known for was the advanced weaponry that was used during battles. The Union and Confederacy made many different types of weapons which helped them have an advantage against each other. A soldier from the South remembers, "I had shot one hundred and twenty times that day. My gun became so hot that frequently the powder would flash before I could ram home the ball, and I had frequently to exchange my gun for that of a dead comrade" ("Small Arms of the Civil"). Weapons played a major role in the battles of the Civil War. Due to more advanced weaponry, the Union won the Civil War.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance era gave birth to many well made and useful weapons. The most important and manageable of these weapons are the sword, bows and crossbows, and axes. These weapons each have differ- ent uses and styles making them convenient for many tasks. Swords are normally depicted as only a knightly weapon, but were also used by commoners for many a duel. Of course they were mostly a knights weapons as they used them in battle for "hewing, slicing, and stabbing" (Renaissance Weapons).…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient warfare and its impact on daily life and the views of people RQ- To what extent did the warfare of these ancient civilisation impact everyday life and the views of people? Warfare was one of the main causes for the expansion of a civilisation. Some civilisations were lucky to some find land uninhabited and ready for urbanisation, whilst others had to conquer land and the people of the land. Even after the land was conquered, armies fought to defend the newly conquered land from different groups, kingdoms and empires that were trying to gain, or regain, control of the area.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays