Preview

Roman Legion and Greek Phalanx

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Legion and Greek Phalanx
The Roman Legion and the Greek Phalanx
The Roman Legion and the Greek Phalanx were both battle formations that were similar in many ways, yet completely different in many other ways. Both formations were formed through strict organization of soldiers and commanding officers. Although both implemented strong organization, they organized their soldiers in a different manner. The Greek Phalanx was one big unit of heavily armored soldiers that were tightly packed and strapped with primarily long spears, shields and short stabbing swords. Due to the weaponry and formation they were incapable to move excessively or turn quickly. If they wished to change direction all spears had to be lifted and then the soldiers were capable to move, but only minimal as they were tightly packed. The Roman Legion on the other hand were both medially or heavily armored soldiers broken up into small groups called maniples and were much more mobile. The Roman Legion consisted of soldiers armed with throwing spears, shields and strong short swords. The Short stabbing sword is a key difference as it was used by the Romans as a primary, rather than the spear. This sword meant they were more mobile and independent on the battlefield. This independence allowed them to freely retreat, flank or attack an enemy. Analyzing these formations from a birds eye point of view also shows key differences. The Greek Phalanx from a birds eye point of view would look like evenly spaced bricks of men of about 16 with spears pointing out. The Roman Legion would range from small formations to larger formations wielding different long range or short ranged weapons, they would also be strategically stretched out to flank and also defend.

Tarun Aulakh
806 350

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Spartan Phalanx is a powerful painting created by John Becker depicting the 2011 Michigan State football players as warriors and as Spartans. In its description, John Becker explains that he wanted to create a picture showing the Michigan State football players as a phalanx in Greek marching formation. Long ago, the Greeks used that attack formation to strike fear into their opponents and to show off their organization and stature. I think that Becker was able to create that image by contrasting the vibrant green to the bland white of their pants which in effect, showed off the players’ extensively built bodies and contributed to their formidability. Not only do the colors add to this menacing effect that Becker creates, but the Greek formation…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An Athenian hoplite carried a heavy 9 foot spear, wore a solid breastplate and carried an almost body-length shield. The Persian infantryman, contrast, wore little more than robes and carried a shorter sword and a wicker or cane shield. Therefore, close-quarter combat favored the Athenians. The Persian disadvantage was exacerbated by the Greek use of the Phalanx formation, an eight hoplite by eight-hoplite square.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While strongest at the front, the phalanx's main weakness was on the right flank and to the rear. Once engaged in battle the heavy armor and close quarters did not allow the phalanx to easily address attacks from either of those directions. Although the battle of Thermopylae was a decisive Persian victory, the employment of the phalanx formation proved to be a useful and superior strategy there as roughly fourteen hundred Hoplite led by King Leonidas and three hundred Spartans held their ground for a week (three spent fighting) halting Persian advancement and causing numerous casualties. Were it not for a traitor exposing a path to the rear of the Greek positionallowing the Persian forces to surround the Greek position, there's no way of knowing how long this small force could have fought or whether or not they could have been victorious.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie Spartacus the deployment of the Roman army is very interesting. In the battle scene you see a deployment of a legion in a quincunx formation (checker board pattern) this shows the discipline and organization of the Roman army. As the Roman army comes closer to Spartacus' slave army the front legion starts to form a solid front line and they would continue moving forward. As the front group is lining up you can see the back legionaries coming together into one group. As an opponent seeing this it can be quiet intimating.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    To begin with, military weakness was a big factor in the fall of Rome. According to Document B, “...armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This shows that the soldiers were very lethargic and couldn’t protect the empire effectively. They stopped doing their ground drills and never wore the breastplates. When war came to Rome they weren’t prepared to wear the armor, so instead they fought with…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the main reasons the Spartans and the other Greeks were able to hold out so long at Thermopylae and secure victory at Plataea was primarily due to their superior battle tactics. The most notable and successful tactic employed by the Greeks was the Phalanx manuver, a wall of overlapping shields and layered spear points, the troops were trained to hold their position within the phalanx which created and almost impenetrable wall, they would then push as one and then attack as one. Out of all the Greeks the Spartans were by far the strongest and most well trained thus their…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The phalanx was tight lines of men who could travel together, almost like a tank. The soldiers were given more compact shields that strapped to their arms. This allowed the formation to be even tighter and more stable. The soldiers were also equipped with spears and stabbing swords. The extra long spears allowed several ranks and lines of men to participate in the battle and decrease strain of the front line. The long spears also allowed for large scale attacks without enduring any severe losses. The big weapon of his army was also the cavalry. The army also had a large supply of horses, and men that man the horses and can fight on foot. In the phalanx, the men of high military expertise, the lochage, was in the front. The soldiers in front and rear would be the strongest soldiers. The phalanx offered impenetrable defense and was well fitted to wear down the enemy line (cite). The effectiveness of the phalanx was demonstrated through the fact that the army would beat enemies even when outnumbered. The phalanx provided a confident tight formation of soldiers surrounded by peers, and a wall of long spears.In addition to the phalanx, the army would have the calvary going into battlefield, flanking the opponents. Alexander reformed the phalanx. He made a way to increase mobility. His reform made it so the archers and javelin men could deploy into intervals and discharge their missiles, and then closing up again in order…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The strengths of Sparta are that they had an advanced military, they respected and trained the women, and they trained the soldiers when the soldiers when they were young. The phalanx was a very large rectangular mass which was composed with with heavy armory,spears, and all other weapons whilst pushing forward. Although they lacked formal education, they took down all of the strongest city states…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main objective of the phalanx was to send the front lines of the enemies back and collapse and then attack and quickly form the phalanx again. This was very effective and it won the Spartans a lot of battles and most enemies would be fearful to fight them. The poem by Tyrateus which became an inspiring poem for the young to be fearless and determined in the mist of battle, told of the way the phalanx was used in battle. He tells of how well the soldiers look and how they defend and fight in the phalanx with descriptions on equipment and…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you imagine four-thousand spartans charging down a hill while three-thousand Athenians ready their bows and release them all simultaneously while the string whips in the hard rain? The Peloponnesian War was one of the most fierce wars in Greece because many people fell in battle. From the South were the Spartans. Their forces had never been stronger with a reformed, military-based government. From the North was the Athenians who had just been through a war that had been won, and were still armed and battle ready, holding fortresses across Greece. The interactions that these two city states made against, with, and without them were so intense that even the fierce kings, Leonidas of Sparta and King Pericles Cleon Nicias of Athens, fell to each other's armies.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Allies from their existence, Athens and Sparta had fought side by side for centuries. These two Greek city-states fought together in the Greco-Persian war, but when the Persians retreated, tension rose. Athens gained more power than they needed, plunging the two cities into nearly three decades of war. The outcome was devastating. Although Sparta won, they were extremely demoralized. Athens was bankrupt and exhausted, and neither city regained the military strength they once had. This infamous conflict came to be known as the Peloponnesian War.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece has impacted many modern day militaries because of several important innovations. Greeks were the first to use strategy in warfare. One such procedure was the utilization of the phalanx development. For instance, the American fighters utilized the phalanx as a part of the Civil War, in light of the fact that their firearms weren't automatic. When one line shoots they go down to reload and afterward the other line does likewise. Likewise, A cutting edge phalanx would the Fire and Movement, or pepper preparing. Flame and development is when troops line up in three waves and alternate terminating at the adversary. Ancient Greeks made organization much less demanding, on the grounds and with that they made ranks. Having ranks is very important because it gives the military a line or chain of command. Standardization is another very important idea that the ancient Greeks invented. By utilizing training, it made fighting innovations less expensive and fighting more secure. For instance, when the ancient Greeks began utilizing naval warfare, they particularly said that every one of the paddles must be 5 meters in length. They did this in light of the fact that if a paddle were to break they could ask a kindred Greek boat to loan additional paddles and the boats would all go generally the same…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romans and Barbarians Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the Romans nomads were considered to be barbarians, however over time Romans began to develop nomadic customs which were no longer considered barbaric but civilized. To the Romans a ‘barbarian’ was anyone who was an outsider of their land, and in that case nomads were considered to be barbaric. Nomads are known as a small group of people that don’t have a permanent settlement, and travel and migrate from place to place. Nomadic people also had a different type of lifestyle from the Romans, for example the nomads hunted and gathered their food, and which was considered cave man like. Before the fall of Rome the Romans were considered to be civilized people with a respectable religion and culture, and after the nomads took over it turned out to be the same thing.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays