Preview

Safety Vs. Freedom In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
796 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Safety Vs. Freedom In The United States
Safety vs Freedom Freedom can be defined simply as the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. The definition of safety can be defined as the condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger, risk, or injury. In America, freedom is the pride and joy that makes a true American, American. It is often called into question when a line needs to be drawn to ensure safety over certain freedoms, for the beneficial costs of many people. There are certain restrictions given with the freedoms we are granted today in order to protect the public safety. Today, safety should be considered more important that freedom, and we should sacrifice certain freedoms we are given in order to keep the safety and well being of others. Our founding fathers granted us …show more content…
According to the second amendment, anyone has the right to bear arms; it is very controversial when considering the reasons someone may be buying a gun. Since anyone could buy a gun, not everyone has the best interest when purchasing it and can use it in situations where it would threaten the welfare and protection of the general public. The argument about gun control is whether or not the freedom that is granted to anyone in the Bill of Rights should be taken away, and safety should repeal this freedom. Although not everyone has the intent of purchasing a gun to kill anyone, safety should be considered a higher factor when allowing people to buy guns. This is a situation where safety should be considered more important than the freedom granted in the Bill of Rights in order to avoid future consequences that could end lives. The freedoms given to literally anyone to own a gun ultimately jeopardizes the safety of others and should be taken more seriously when it comes to allowing and determining who should and shouldn’t be able to purchase

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed to repeat history if we fail to learn from it, an examination into the circumstances of the Japanese American internment in 1942 may inform the ways to most effectively deal with the security concerns faced by Americans today.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of this essay is to critique the United States homeland security system and its capabilities to meet both the new issues and future challenges. Besides, this exposition will address and analyze the existing efforts of apparent dichotomy that are crucial to homeland security on one hand while maintaining civil liberties on the other side.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    scrub getten rekt

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gun control has been a controversial issue for years. A vast majority of citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even for the pleasure of hunting. These people are penalized for protecting their lives, or even for enjoying a common, innocent sport. To enforce gun control throughout the nation, means violating a persons Constitutional rights. Although some people feel that the issue of gun control will limit crime, the issue should not exist due to the fact that guns are necessary for self-defense against crime, and by enforcing gun control is violating a citizen's second amendment right to bear arms.…

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anit-Gun Control

    • 1769 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun control is one of the most heavily debated topics in the United States today. There are two very distinct sides to this subject; nonetheless, it is a direct attack on the Second Amendment right afforded to everyone in the Bill of Rights. Governments throughout history have tried to disarm its people in order to have more control over citizens. With mass shootings happening at schools, movie theaters and malls gun control has gotten more supporters for the disarming of citizens. However, when citizens are able to defend themselves these types of massacres can be stopped while keeping the death toll down. The gun control debate has been an issue for a long time but the reality will always be there through the history, facts and other options without attacking the Constitution it will serve better for the people of United States to protect their right as a free citizen.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concealed Carry

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the beginning of our nation after the Declaration of Independence was signed, individuals have had the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Inside these ‘rights’ is the right to bear arms. Is that wrong? Should all people have access to firearms? As stated in the second amendment, we as a nation and individuals have every right to own our own weapons. Therefore, it is your right to either own a weapon or not. There are some who buy a gun, put it in their gun cabinet, and never look at it again for years. Others shoot their guns regularly at ranges, take it to go on a hunting trip, or keep it close to their bed at night if they live in areas with a high crime rate, and these are all practices of using a gun that are considered to be proper uses. On the other hand, there are those who obtain them illegally and use them to harm, murder, rape, or put fear in other citizens. Most states offer a concealed handgun license that you can get when you turn twenty-one by going through the right course in order for you to carry a weapon around legally. The right to bear arms is an important symbol of an individual’s freedoms that our founding fathers established for those who understood the proper and improper uses when you bear arms, and anyone or anything trying to take that away is morally unjust and unconstitutional.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue is whether or not it is unconstitutional to have gun control in the United States. I think we shouldn't have gun control but support gun rights. Gun control would be against the common good. If the government took away the guns from citizens we would have no way of protecting ourselves. People wishing to use guns to harm people could smuggle them in from other countries and lie about having them. Therefore if a citizen had a gun, that citizen could hypothetically stop the other person from harming others.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control is a very large problem going on in the United States today. All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be used with precautions, as well as the right safety regulations. Guns can be hazardous and tragic accidents can happen, like the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut, but only if they are in the hands of the wrong person. Guns are not only used every day for protection, such as law enforcement like the military and the police, but guns are also used for recreational activities such as hunting. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, which also means we have the right to own a gun to protect ourselves and our families not only from criminals, but also from the government. So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct. I believe gun control in the United States should not necessarily be eliminated, but reduced greatly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Essay

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Gun control has been on the forefronts of debate since the 1960’s when there were some high profile shootings. The increase of gun violence since the 1980’s has just increased the argument over who should be allowed to own and carry weapons. The Second Amendment is the biggest stumbling block in this debate because people interpreted it differently. The one side argues that it states that we have the right to bear arms, but the other side says that it doesn’t pertain to us anymore in the modern era. Politicians love to use the idea that removing legal guns will drastically reduce suicides, assassinations, gang-violence, school shootings, accidental child deaths, and general murders. They don’t consider the fact that someone that wants to kill themselves will do it anyway they can, or a college kid trying to tear up his school will just blow it up if he cannot find a gun. Criminals vary rarely use registered guns to commit crimes, they use illegally acquired weapons. Gun control only protects the criminals and the image of the government’s control over the people. The controversial movement to disarm people has infringed their natural right to self-preservation(self-defense), which takes away their true freedom. The Founding Fathers believed that freedom and no gun control goes hand in hand, which is why they wrote the Second Amendment. “To disarm the people… was the best and most effectual way to enslave them” (Henry, 1788) Patrick Henry’s quote sums up gun control. So, why after all these years have we forgotten his words? History has proven Henry’s words to be true over and over, but the nation keeps disregarding it. Americans need to act urgently on this matter, because if no action is taken on gun control, we will become another ‘Hitler’s’ Germany or ‘Stalin’s’ Russia, without…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Culture

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states that, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. Am. 2). This amendment guarantees American citizens the right to have firearms. Since this amendment is very indistinct, it has remained a matter of debate and discussion in the United States. Many people are asking whether every citizen should have the right to possess a gun? There are many advocates of gun control people who wish to have strict laws to prevent certain groups of people from buying a gun. And there’s also those who disagree with gun control laws, and feel there should be a more tolerant gun control to…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our society today, many people want to be safe and secure. This is understandable, being that there have been many terrorist attacks, shootings, bombings, and much more. But is safety and security a good reason to sacrifice freedom? Napoleons society seemed to be dealing with the same question – security or freedom? They believed that as long as they were safe, they wouldn’t mind what the government did. It seems to be that same way in America today. As long as the government keeps us safe, we don’t mind what they do. But is that really freedom? Or are we saying we are willing to give up our freedom for safety? I’m not sure, and neither was Napoleons society.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is freedom without security? Nothing. One of the main reasons why people come to the United States is because it’s known for being the “land of the free.” But how do you think we got this freedom? By fighting for it, by not giving up until we had the freedom that we’ve always wanted.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays