Sandefur's Argument Analysis

Sandefur asserts that lawyers are more likely to win cases, with their role being to advise and negotiate as well as to possess professionalism enhance the outcome of the litigation process. She continues to express that without legal representation, individuals whose cases merit favorable judgment may loose their bid due to their inability to communicate their merits through means that courts and judges understand.

She provided further evidence to suggest that represented parties are more likely to be in an advantageous position than unrepresented litigants. This is highly to due to the substantive expertise of lawyers. Furthermore, the repeated appearance of a lawyer in front of courts can impose a reliable and trustworthy relationship between the lawyer and the judge, providing greater credit to their arguments and potentially impacting on the outcome of the hearing.

It is important to apprehend the difficulties associated with self-representation, with Sandefur showing that thousands of those unrepresented in courts within the United Sates loose civil matters leading to severe consequences including homelessness and bankruptcy.

‘The presence of any lawyer, as opposed to no lawyer at all, signals something important about a case to the people involved in processing it”
This quote is very relevant to our
The study proves to be a reliable and useful resource and therefore this has provided the opportunity to strongly assert to the reader, the role of legal practitioners in the litigation process and portrays how their absence can hugely impact on the outcome of the hearing. However, she needs to investigate more precisely how much lawyers differ in their level of substantive and relational expertise and the impact this can have on the litigation