Sandel's Unease Of Genetic Enhancement

. Sandel illustrates his unease with genetic enhancement by refuting arguments people have previously used to oppose genetic enhancement. All while telling us why such arguments were not successful, and redirecting our attention to the real dilemma. Sandel feels that the common arguments society makes against generic enhancement are not sufficient to portray the entire ethical problem and on top of that the arguments are flawed themselves. Arguments such as violation of autonomy, fairness, gap of economic classes, competition to perfection, and Nazi eugenics are not sufficient to express the moral unease that embodies the act of generic
enhancement.