Preview

Self-defence and terrorism

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Self-defence and terrorism
HC/PS/13015-Faith Kisio

Self-defence and its Implications to the War on Terror
Introduction
The quest for international security has become more elusive in recent years. From the continuous conflict in the Middle East to resource wars in Africa and territorial conflict in
Europe, there has been an increase in insecurity globally. This has been incredibly exacerbated by the war on terror post September 11, 2001 attack in the United States (US). It was following this attack that the US declared war on Al-qaeda and the eventual invasion of Iraq.
The United Nations (UN) Charter states that,

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the
Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council…… (U.N. Charter art. 51).

Article 51 is regarded as the cornerstone of the right to self-defence in International Law and other Security Council resolutions as well as the right to combat terror (International Law Series,
2010). This paper seeks to analyze the precepts of self-defence under the UN charter and its applications in the War on Terror. This will be done by first outlining the history of terrorism and counter-terrorism and its application in the right of self-defense in accordance to international law. The interconnectedness of the world has increased the need for security to be secured.

1
Self-defence and International Terrorism

HC/PS/13015-Faith Kisio

Therefore this paper will also look at the effectiveness and implication of self-defense in combating terrorism which will also act as the conclusion.

Self-defense and international law

In accordance



References: Bugnion, F. (2001, December 12). Law of Geneva and Law of the Hague. ICRC Resource Centre Buzan, B. & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Champion, S. (2009, February 14). Anticipatory (pre-emptive) self-defence: the need for a modern approach Chichakyan, G. (2013, October 29). Victims of Drone Strike Testify Before Congress [Video file] Gunaratne, R. (2012, November 15). Nicaragua vs United States (summary) on self-defence and use Husain, W. (2013, October 31). The obvious illegality of drones. Tribune with the International New York Times International Law Series: the Right to Self Defense. (2010, January 13). NGO Monitor.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Self-defense: To assert this doctrine, the use of self-defense must be both necessary to avoid an imminent deadly attack and the force used must be both necessary and reasonable to avoid that deadly attack. No force can be used merely in retaliation or for revenge.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "A Brief Look at Pertinent Articles of the Geneva Conventions on the Laws of Warfare." (2006): n. pag. Web. 10 Aug. 2014.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    world order essay

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whilst nation states have a responsibility to protect, state sovereignty ultimately hinders the achievement of world order. State sovereignty relies to the ultimate law-making process of a state over its territory and population, including independence from external interference, as exemplified domestically in Section 51 of the Australian Constitution. Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) (1945), stipulates that ‘nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the interference of any state’. Due to the non-mandatory nature of multilateral compliance, states can ultimately impede the influence of international law and use state sovereignty as a barrier to their conduct, as shown in the conflicts of Sudan, Kosovo, Libya and East Timor. However, the nationally acclaimed benchmark ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) (2005)’, originating from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s Report, places the onus on nation states to ensure the protection of their citizens from instances of mass atrocity. The UN, enshrining of their doctrine under paragraph 138 and 139 of the Charter of the UN, bridges the limitations of state sovereignty with international law. Unfortunately, nation states may still abstain from participation with international law…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main problem in combating terrorism is an inability to monitor and translate any information retrieved from potential threats (National Institute of Justice, 2012). The government can use all of its time and money gathering information from suspected terrorist but if that information is not translated in a timely manner or translated correctly, the information is practically useless and the time and money used to collect it wasted (National Institute of Justice, 2012).…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A month after the terrorist attack in the US, a war was launched by the United States. This war was known as the “fight back” war. It was the beginning of George Bush administration’s war on terrorism. The main theme of this war was to stop terrorism and catch Osama Bin Laden. He was the main person who planned this evil attack on September 11, 2001. Bin Laden’s trained groups that were called Al- Qaeda. The FBI had gathered evidences and discovered that the hijackers of the planes that crashed in 9/11 were trained by the Al-Qaeda. Many Al-Qaeda members had studied United States airports security and flight schedules. They were also trained and became certified commercial pilots in the United States.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    National Security Outline

    • 40744 Words
    • 163 Pages

    CHAPTER 4: The Use of Force in International Relations: Norms Concerning the Initiation of Coercion (JNM)…

    • 40744 Words
    • 163 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    International responses include the Geneva conventions, ‘laws of war’. Which is a series of 4 treaties adopted between 1864 and 1949 to regulate the conduct of armed conflict and attempt to limit its affects. these 4 treaties include; the first Geneva convention (1864) which protects wounded and sick soldiers on land during war, the second Geneva convention (1906) which protects wounded, sick and ship wrecked military personnel at sea during war, the third Geneva convention (1929) which…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    allowed to arm themselves, to receive training or opt for less lethal weapons in order to protect…

    • 2896 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War on Terriosm

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    threat. The tragic events of September 11 in New York, the Washington, D.C., area, and…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to make this paper easier to understand, it is necessary to explain the differences between the terms “prisoner of war” and “unlawful combatants” together with a short summary of what the Geneva Convention implies with regards to the aforementioned terms. The most relevant difference between POWs (Prisoners of war) and unlawful combatants is that POWs are entitled to a set of rights stated in the Geneva Convention. Because unlawful combatants do not fight by the accepted rules of war, they do…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Use of force

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Good day class! In preparation of your Midterm Examination, which includes the Chapter on the Use of…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recognition of self-determination in international law is new. International law has adopted self-determination as a right in 1941 by UN charter, but from the beginning of the civilization the desire for self-determination was there. Debate over this topic is like never ending saga, as it’s related to government, peace, war, right, aggression etc. The book I have chosen to review is a research monograph, written by Elizabeth Chadwick, entitled as “Self-determination in the Post 9/11 Era”. Where she wanted to argue that- the position of “self-determination”became more complex than ever as post 9/11 incident of terrorist attack by Al Qaeda on New York, Washington DC and Pennsylvania increased the tendency of the government to incorporate self-determination into anti-terrorist agenda. I should disclose the reason why I chose the book. It’s because, the term self-determination has lost its original meaning…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The defense of human rights and upholding the rule of law while countering terrorism is indeed at the heart of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy. Member States acknowledged that effective counter-terrorism measures and the protection of human rights were not conflicting goals but complementary and mutually reinforcing aims. They pledged to take measures aimed at addressing violations of human rights and to ensure that any measures taken to counter terrorism comply with their human rights obligations.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    established doctrines and norms, especially those in the Charter of the United Nations, thus If the security council chooses to intervene, militarily or through sanctions, it must also justify its actions to the international community to maintain its credibility and…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under such reading, one may propose that the ICJ's statement on self-defence in the Nicaragua case is not applicable to the question of whether the use of nuclear weapons may be warranted as a measure of self-defence. However, prominent scholars have maintained that the emphatic statement of the ICJ regarding the use of self-defence is an immutable principle of international law.25 We may therefore argue that article 59 of the Court Statute does not explicitly prohibit a state to use nuclear weapons as a measure of…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays