semiotics of architectural semiotics
INSTITUTE OF ART STUDIES,
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Stela Borisova Tasheva
SEMIOTICS OF ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS
DETAILED SUMMARY of a PhD Thesis in the field of
"Theory and History of Architecture" Code 02 17 01
Scientific Advisor:
Dr. Arch. Dobrina Zheleva -Martins
Reviewers:
Professor Dr. Hristo Kaftandjiev
Dr. Arch. Georgii Stanishev
SOFIA
2012
The PhD thesis was discussed and proposed for defense proceedings on 6th March, 2012, after enlarged meeting of sector "Architecture", Institute of Art Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
The dissertation consists of an introduction, two main parts, conclusion and contributions, thematic bibliography and annexes: thesaurus and listing of illustrations ' content and sources.
Statistics: 172 pages (453,233 characters or 252 standard printed pages), 101 illustrations
The public PhD defence was held on 22.06.2012 at 10:00 AM, in open session of the scientific jury: Professor Dr. Hristo Kaftandjiev, Dr. Arch. Georgii Stanishev, Dr. Joanna SpassovaDikova, Dr. Arch. Boyan Georgiev, Dr. Arch. Dobrina Zheleva-Martins, Professor Dr. Ivan Kasabov and Professor Dr. Nicolai Tuleschkov (alternate members).
The dissertation work is available to whom it may concern in the library of the Institute of
Art Studies at "Krakra" № 21, and in NACID database Sofia, Bulgaria. A detailed resume, scientific reviews and opinions in Bulgarian and English are posted on the website of the Institute of Art
Studies
2
I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PHD THESIS
As an initial convention it should be noted that PhD thesis was pioneer and fundamental in its scientific area. Thus, there was a significant expansion of studied fields (as to extract the essentials from any close topic), but a reduced concentration on different aspects and stages. In order that the thesis stays adhered to architectural field, specific terminologies of semiotics and technology were strictly avoided. The terms in the aspect they
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Stela Borisova Tasheva
SEMIOTICS OF ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS
DETAILED SUMMARY of a PhD Thesis in the field of
"Theory and History of Architecture" Code 02 17 01
Scientific Advisor:
Dr. Arch. Dobrina Zheleva -Martins
Reviewers:
Professor Dr. Hristo Kaftandjiev
Dr. Arch. Georgii Stanishev
SOFIA
2012
The PhD thesis was discussed and proposed for defense proceedings on 6th March, 2012, after enlarged meeting of sector "Architecture", Institute of Art Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
The dissertation consists of an introduction, two main parts, conclusion and contributions, thematic bibliography and annexes: thesaurus and listing of illustrations ' content and sources.
Statistics: 172 pages (453,233 characters or 252 standard printed pages), 101 illustrations
The public PhD defence was held on 22.06.2012 at 10:00 AM, in open session of the scientific jury: Professor Dr. Hristo Kaftandjiev, Dr. Arch. Georgii Stanishev, Dr. Joanna SpassovaDikova, Dr. Arch. Boyan Georgiev, Dr. Arch. Dobrina Zheleva-Martins, Professor Dr. Ivan Kasabov and Professor Dr. Nicolai Tuleschkov (alternate members).
The dissertation work is available to whom it may concern in the library of the Institute of
Art Studies at "Krakra" № 21, and in NACID database Sofia, Bulgaria. A detailed resume, scientific reviews and opinions in Bulgarian and English are posted on the website of the Institute of Art
Studies
2
I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PHD THESIS
As an initial convention it should be noted that PhD thesis was pioneer and fundamental in its scientific area. Thus, there was a significant expansion of studied fields (as to extract the essentials from any close topic), but a reduced concentration on different aspects and stages. In order that the thesis stays adhered to architectural field, specific terminologies of semiotics and technology were strictly avoided. The terms in the aspect they
Bibliography: Ангелов, Сл., Архитектурна перспектива, Техника, С., 1963 Божков, Й., Строителен наръчник в таблици ,СЕК, 2006 Данов, Т., Композиция и изобразителни средства в архитектурната перспектива, София, Техника, 1977 Денев, Б., Перспективата в живописта и архитектурата, 1948 Донков Ат., Ръководство по архитектура Част І и ІІ, София, 1945 Казакова, В., Елементи на архитектурната графика, София, 1974 Кръстев, Т., Архитектурно творчество, София, Техника,1979 Морозов, Д., Изобразителни похвати в архитектурата, Техника, София, 1958 Нойферт, Е. Нойферт - Архитектурно проектиране, Софтпрес, 2007 НАРЕДБА № 8 от 14.06.2001 г Попов, Ст., Методика на архитектурното проектиране, Техника, София, 1983 Попов, И., Построяване на сенки в архитектурните чертежи, Техника, София, 1974 Воронихин, А. Н., Чертежи и рисунки, Литературы по строительству и архитектуры, Москва, 1952 Гельб, И.Е., Опыт изучения письма, Москва, Радуга, 1982 Зайцев К. Г., Графика и архитектурное творчество, Москва, Стройиздат, 1979 с. 99, 103 КИТАЙСКАЯ ЖИВОПИСЬ, Колектив авторов, ред Кудряшев, К. В., Архитектурная графика, Архитектура – С, 2004 Флоренский П.А.,ОБРАТНАЯ ПЕРСПЕКТИВА, Соч Alberti, Leon Battista , De Pictura, 1435, http://www.noteaccess.com/Texts/Alberti/index.htm Ching, F Ching, F.D.K., A Visual Dictionary of Architecture, Wiley,1996 Della Francesca, Piero, De Prospectiva Pingendi, 1474 Dernie, D., Architectural Drawing, Laurence King Publishers, 2010 Dürer,А., Underweysung der Messung mit dem Zirckel und Richtscheyt, Nüremberg 1525, http://www.slub-dresden.de/sammlungen/digitale-sammlungen/werkansicht/cache.off?tx_dlf[id]=17139 Dürer, А., Vier Bücher von Menschlicher Proportion, Nürnberg, 1528 Edwards, B., Understanding Architecture through Drawings, Spon Press, 1993. Edwards, B., The New Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain, Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, NY, Third Edition, 1999 Gehry, F., (Editors) M. Rappolt, R. Violette, Gehry Draws, The MIT Press, 2004, p 8-9 Gilewicz,W., L Graphics,Volume 1, 1997, No. 1, 59-65, http://www.heldermann-verlag.de/jgg/jgg01_05/jgg0108.pdf Kliment, S., Architectural Sketching and Rendering: Techniques for Designers and Artists, Watson-Guptill, 1984 Hepler, D Hewitt , M., Representational Forms and Modes of Conception, Journal of Architectural Education,1985,39/2, p.2–9 Jeer, S., Barry Bain, Traditional Color Coding for Land Uses, American Planning Association, 1997, http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/gis/manual/style/ColorConventions.pdf Jefferis, A., Commercial drafting and detailing, N.Y., Delmar Cengage Learning, 2010 Lampugnani, Vittorio Magnago. Architecture of the 20th Century in Drawings. New York: Rizzoli, 1982 р. 31 Lockard, W 2009, p. 115-125, http://www.etsavega.net/dibex/Caprarola-e.htm Piranesi,Giovanni Battista, Vedute di Roma,1748; Antichita Romanae, 1748; De Romanorvm Magnificentia Et Architectvra, 1761; Osservazioni Di Gio. Battista Piranesi sopra la Lettre de M. Mariette aux auteurs de la Gazette Littéraire de l 'Europe, 1765 Robbins, E., Why Architects Draw, The MIT Press, 1997, p 129 Schank Smith, K., ARCHITECTS’ DRAWINGS A Selection of Sketches by World Famous Architects Through History, Elsevier Ltd, 2005, p Schank Smith, K., Architect 's Sketches, Dialogue and Design, Elsevier Ltd, 2008, p.3 Schaller,T 2007, 2007, Pennsylvania, USA Shiratuddin, M.F Information Technology in Construction – ITcon, 2011, Special issue on Use of Gaming and Virtual World Technology in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. Stelley, S., Oscar Niemeyer, The 101-Year-Old Man Who Invented Brazil’s Capital, 2011 Vice Media Inc, 2010, http://www.vice.com/read/oscar-niemeyer-856-v16n5 Wakita, O., A. Linde, Richard M., Bakhoum, Nagy R. The Professional Practice of Architectural Working Drawings, JohnWiley and Sons Ltd, 2011, p Wang, T. C., Plan and section drawing, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1996 Yee,R., Architectural Drawing: A Visual Compendium of Types and Methods, Wiley, 2007 Zell, Mo, The Architectural Drawing Course, Understand the Principles and Master the Practices, Thames & Hudson, 2008 SEMIOTICS, SEMIOTICS AND ARCHITECTURE, CULTURE Барт, Р., Нулева степен на почерка. Митологии, (Le degré zéro de l 'écriture. Mythologies), София, ИК Колибри, 2004 Желева-Мартинс, Д., Тектониката като теория на формата и формообразуването, Акад Дринов", 2000 Желева-Мартинс, Д., Огнището – архетип на дома – В: "Български фолклор", БАН, Институт по Фолклор,1995, брой Касабов, Ив., Лингвистиката между строгите науки и свободните изкуства, изд. НБУ, 2008 Кафтанджиев, Хр., Визуална комуникация, Отворено общество, София, 1996 Кафтанджиев. Хр., Хармония в рекламната комуникация, Сиела, 2000 Кафтанджиев Колапиетро, В.М., (Vincent M. Colapietro) Речник по семиотика / Dictionary of semiotics, превод И. Младенов, Хейзъл, София, 2000 Бахтин М.М., Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. М.: Худ. лит., 1972. с. 434. Вартофский, М., Рисунок, репрезентация и понимание, В кн. Модели: репрезентация и научное понимание. Москва, Прогресс, 1988, http://www.philosophy.ru/library/wartof/wartofsky1.html Дженкс.Ч., Язык архитектуры постмодернизма, Москва, 1985г стр.32, стр 43, стр.48 Желева-Мартинс, Д., Семантика архитектурной формы, Сб ВНИИТАГ, с. 81-113. 1991 Лотман, Ю.М., О семиосфере, в Избр.статей в 3-х тт Александра, 1992. Т.1, http://semiotics.ru/sphere/semiosphere.html Попова, М., Семиотика и комуникации. Очерци и разговори за знака и неговата употреба, НБУ, София, 2004