Date Lab Performed: Nov. 11/2013
Date Lab Submitted: Nov. 18/2013
Introduction
We conducted this experiment to investigate the technique of liquid / liquid extraction, the miscibility of organics and water and the effect of a mixture of compounds in methylene chloride versus pure compounds retention time as introduced to a Gas chromatograph. From this information, the identity of the compounds can be determined.
GC delivery psi: 60
Carrier Gas 1: 3.5 kg/cm2
Carrier Gas 2: 0.75 kg/cm2
Porapak Q 80/100 6’X1/855 79434 10.21.88 Supelco
Method
We rinsed a separatory funnel with tap and then deionized water, then poured our unknown sample into the top (ensuring that the stopcock was closed). We rinsed the beaker with methylene chloride and poured the rinsing into the separatory funnel. We added 10 mL of methylene chloride to the separatory funnel from a graduated cylinder. We greased the ground glass stopper with silicone grease and stoppered the separatory funnel. We then inverted it, swirling gently and venting often by opening the stopcock towards a fumehood. We repeated this process several times until the amount of gas escaping had diminished. We placed the separatory funnel into an iron ring we had attached to a retort stand on the benchtop and allowed the aqueous and organic layers to separate. (Unlike in typical aqueous/organic separations, our organic layer was on the bottom of the separatory funnel.) We cleaned and dried an Erlenmeyer flask, and drained the organic layer into the Erlenmeyer by opening the stopcock. We stoppered the Erlenmeyer with a rubber stopper between draining. We repeated the adding of methylene chloride, swirling, venting, settling and draining the organic layer three times. Into the Erlenmeyer, we added a scoop of drying agent and swirled until clumps formed. We stoppered the Erlenmeyer and allowed it to sit for five minutes with the drying agent in the liquid. We started up the GC according to the protocol and began by injecting the series of single standards before injecting the mixture.
Deviation from protocol: Rotary evaporation of the concentrated mixture was not performed as it was determined that the process took to long. Attenuation was set to 64 for all single standards and changed to 16 for mixture.
Refer to “Gradient HPLC Laboratory” (Analytical Instrumentation Lab Manual CHEM 3003, Version 1, 2013) for complete procedure.
Results
Table 1. Comparison of retention times of single compounds (Atten. 64) versus unknown mixture (Atten. 16).
Standard
Retention Time (min)
Retention Time of Compounds in Extract (min)
Methanol
0.523
0.625
Ethanol
1.017
--------------
Acetone
1.512
--------------
Methylene Chloride
1.433
1.465
2 - Propanol
1.658
--------------
1 - Propanol
2.257
2.567
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
3.24
--------------
Ethyl Acetate
3.348
--------------
2 – Butanol
3.692
--------------
Hexane
3.21
--------------
Cyclohexane
4.062
4.397
1 – Butanol
5.24
--------------
Table 2. Possible contaminants of unknown mixture which would contribute to longer retention times.
Name
Structure
Miscibility / solubility in Water
Miscibility / solubility in Methylene Chloride
Boiling Point ()C)
Methanol
Miscible
Miscible
65
Ethanol
Miscible
Miscible
78
Acetone
Miscible
Miscible
57
Methylene Chloride
Immiscible
Miscible
39
2 - Propanol
Miscible
Miscible
82
1 - Propanol
Miscible
Miscible
97
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Immiscible
Miscible
80
Ethyl Acetate
Immiscible
Miscible
77
2 – Butanol
Immiscible
Miscible
100
Hexane
Immiscible
Miscible
69
Cyclohexane
Immiscible
Miscible
81
1 - Butanol
Immiscible
Miscible
100
Discussion
When looking at the miscibility of our standards in methylene chloride (see table 2.) it is clear that all the standards are soluble in methylene chloride (our organic layer). This suggests that no one contaminant can be pinpointed as the source of extended retention times for the unknown mixture. It is likely there was some incomplete separation while in the separatory funnel contributing to the addition of water to the Erlenmeyer that was not completely absorbed by the drying agent. The components of our unknown mixture (as compared to the data in Table 1.) were determined to be methanol, methylene chloride, 1 – propanol and cyclohexane.
References
Mandeville, T. (2013). Liquid/Liquid Extraction with Identification by GC. Analytical Instrumentation Lab Book, pgs. 41 – 44. Belleville, ON; Loyalist College.
Kramp, K. (2012). Liquid/Liquid Extraction with Identification by GC. Analytical Instrumentation Lab Manual CHEM 3003, Version 3, pgs. 1 – 5. Belleville, ON; Loyalist College.
Phenomonex. (2013). Solvent Miscibility Chart. Retrieved from: http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/pdf/solvent.miscibility.pdf
Webmaster. (2013). Methanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=methanol
Webmaster. (2013). Ethanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=ethanol
Webmaster. (2013). Acetone. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=acetone
Webmaster. (2013). Methylene Chloride. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=methylene+chloride
Webmaster. (2013). 2 - Propanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=2-propanol
Webmaster. (2013). 1 - Propanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=1-propanol
Webmaster. (2013). Methyl Ethyl Ketone. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=methyl+ethyl+ketone
Webmaster. (2013). Ethyl Acetate. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=ethyl+acetate
Webmaster. (2013). 2 - Butanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=2-butanol
Webmaster. (2013). Hexane. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=hexane
Webmaster. (2013). Cyclohexane. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=cyclohexane
Webmaster. (2013). 2-Butanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=2-butanol
Sigma-Aldrich. (2013). Miscibility Immiscibility: Dichloromethane. Retrieved from: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/chemistry/solvents/dichloromethane-center/miscibility-immiscibility.html
References: Mandeville, T. (2013). Liquid/Liquid Extraction with Identification by GC. Analytical Instrumentation Lab Book, pgs. 41 – 44. Belleville, ON; Loyalist College. Kramp, K. (2012). Liquid/Liquid Extraction with Identification by GC. Analytical Instrumentation Lab Manual CHEM 3003, Version 3, pgs. 1 – 5. Belleville, ON; Loyalist College. Phenomonex. (2013). Solvent Miscibility Chart. Retrieved from: http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/pdf/solvent.miscibility.pdf Webmaster Webmaster. (2013). Ethanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=ethanol Webmaster Webmaster. (2013). Methylene Chloride. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=methylene+chloride Webmaster Webmaster. (2013). 1 - Propanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=1-propanol Webmaster Webmaster. (2013). Ethyl Acetate. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=ethyl+acetate Webmaster Webmaster. (2013). Hexane. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=hexane Webmaster Webmaster. (2013). 2-Butanol. Retrieved from: http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name=2-butanol Sigma-Aldrich
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Objective: The main goal of this lab is to learn how separation of binary liquid mixtures is performed. Especially when the two liquids have boiling points varying by about 30° C. Hexane can be separated from toluene in this experiment because of the difference in their boiling points. Since toluene has a higher boiling point, it will left at the bottom while the hexane starts to boil out and collect in the Hickman still. GC measurements help us in determining how accurate our data is by making a graph of the amount of hexane and toluene in each fraction. Also this lab gives experience with semi-micro distillation in order for experiments in the future that might need this purification setup.…
- 1041 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The distillation procedure is initiated by gradually heating the mixture until it reaches the temperature of the liquid with the lower boiling point. This liquid then turns into a vapor and leaves to mixture and is collected by the set up apparatus. In fractional distillation a vigreux column is used. This provides for surface area for condensation to occur. At each condensation event the vapor is enriched in the low boiling point component and the liquid is enriched in the high boiling point component. The surfaces where condensation occurs are called theoretical plates. Separation is more efficient when there are more theoretical plates. Therefore, fractional distillation is more efficient in separating than simple distillation. Another new technique was gas chromatography. Gas chromatography is used to separate volatile components of a mixture. First, a small amount is draw up into a syringe and the contents of the syringe are placed into a hot injector pot of the gas chromatograph. The components of the mixture evaporate into the gas phase inside the injector. A carrier gas flows through the injected and pushed the…
- 395 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of this laboratory investigation is to observe how chromatography can be used to separate mixtures of a solution.…
- 748 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this experiment we also used a chemical method known as extraction. This process of separation is used when only one component of the mixture is soluble in a specific solvent. In our case we had to use hydrochloric acid (HCl).Extractions, is a way to separate a desired substance when it is mixed with others. The mixture is brought into contact with a solvent in which the substance of interest is soluble, but the other substances present are insoluble. And below is a…
- 854 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Today in lab I will separate mixtures of compounds into their constituent components using chromatography paper and an eluting solvent of salt water as well as rubbing alcohol.…
- 599 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Purpose: The purpose of this lab is to learn separation techniques using individual physical properties of each substance in the mixture.…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The beaker was covered with aluminum foil with a hole and was CH2Cl2 was evaporated.…
- 1606 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The mixture (sample number: 27) was dissolved in 200 mL of CH2Cl2 and then extracted with 10% NaOH. The acid was removed by adding 3 x 50 mL of 10% NaOH. The neutral component in CH2Cl2 solution was set aside. The NaOH extracts were combined and then washed with 15 mL of CH2Cl2. The aqueous solution was acidified with 10% HCl. The solid yield (neutral component) was collected by vacuum filtration whereas the liquid yield (acidic component) was extracted into CH2Cl2 (3x25 mL). The acidic compound was then washed with 100 mL of water, dried over MgSO4, filtered. The solvent CH2Cl2 then was removed by evaporating it.…
- 850 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of this experiment was to use solvent extraction techniques in order to separate a mixture consisting of a carboxylic acid (p-toulic acid), a phenol (p-tert-butylphenol), and a neutral compound (acetanilide). Extraction is the process of selectively dissolving one or more of the compounds of a mixture into an appropriate solvent, the solution that contains these dissolved compounds is called an extract (Manion, 2004).…
- 1456 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Column chromatography was invented by Tswett in 1906 so that his study of the chemistry of chlorophyll could be facilitated. Tswett made significant advances in the method and demonstrated its applicability to the separation of many different kinds of mixtures. Column chromatography rapidly found application in all areas of chemistry and is used extensively today because it is a simple but powerful tool for the separation of pure compounds from a complex mixture. It cannot affect the same degree of separation as TLC, but its advantage over TLC is the fact that large amounts of mixtures (over 5 g) can easily be treated by this method. There are, however, a number of important similarities between TLC and column chromatography which, when the two methods are used in complementary fashion, allow preparative separations to be accomplished easily and quickly. The same comments that were made concerning adsorbents and solvents for TLC apply also to column chromatography. In particular, by using TLC initially to determine a solvent system for separation of a mixture, one can quickly find the solvent system that will effect separation of the same mixture on a column of the same adsorbent. (In other words, if a particular solvent system effects separation on, say, alumina with TLC, a very similar solvent system will effect separation of a column, provided that alumina of the same type is used as adsorbent.…
- 721 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Purpose: The purpose of this lab is to become familiar with the separations of mixtures and solids.…
- 718 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Experiment 55 consists of devising a separation and purification scheme for a three component mixture. The overall objective is to isolate in pure form two of the three compounds. This was done using extraction, solubility, crystallization and vacuum filtration. The experiment was carried out two times, both of which were successful.…
- 1426 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of this experiment was to separate a mixture of ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and toluene by using the method of fractional distillation and to analyze the fractions using gas chromatography (GC).…
- 1878 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
From the data collected and the results calculated, I can conclude the percent yield of naphthalene and salicylic acid. (SAL is handwritten in the data tables above). The five melting points for the mixture, crude and pure naphthalene and salicylic acid are also provided above. The final mass of naphthalene was 0.0520g and the theoretical value was 0.174g. I found these values by…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
5 mL of the unknown impure organic A was collected in an Erlenmeyer flask. A simple distillation apparatus was assembled and 3 mL of the unknown impure organic A was transferred into the distillation flask along with 3 boiling chips. A thermometer was then suspended down the middle of the condenser to record the distillation temperature. The mixture was heated gently and a pure solvent started to collect in the distillation flask. Two different fractions were collected. The first one was the forerun, which was collected before the temperature stabilized and the second one was when the temperature of the boiling compound began to stabilize. The unknown impure organic A was identified using density and boiling point measurements collected.…
- 648 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays