Preview

shipwrecked sailor case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
shipwrecked sailor case
Shipwrecked Sailor Case
Opening Statement
May it please the court, your Honor, Counsel, my name is Corinne Newbern, counsel for-the prosecution in this action. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it is my intent to prove to you that during that fateful night in the Atlantic Ocean, Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens selfishly and cowardly stole the life of Mr. Brooks and proceeded to eat him because they valued their own lives over that of a fellow crewmate. Mr. Brooks, Mr. Stephens, and Mr. Dudley were all crew members on a ship crossing the Atlantic Ocean. They would never reach their destination though. Halfway through their journey a horrible storm struck and caused the ship to sink. Mr. Brooks and his fellow survivors, Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens, were all stranded on a small life boat with no food, completely at the mercy of God. Mr. Stephens estimated they could only last 25 days without food. So day in and day out they sat on this lifeboat, waiting for a ship to come. Eventually Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens grew desperate. The facts will show that exactly 5 days before they were rescued by a passing ship, Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens killed and engaged in a ruthless act of cannibalism by eating Mr. Brooks in an attempt to prolong their survival. Witnesses will provide evidence to show that the remains of Mr. Brooks were found inside the stomach of the accused. Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens also confessed when questioned by authorities about the events that took place on the lifeboat. They acted cowardly and selfishly stole the life of an innocent man. Mr. Brooks’ family will never be able to say good bye or have a proper burial to honor him because these two men stole that away from them.

How Would I Prove the Case?
In order prove my case I would call have to prove that Mr. Stephens and Mr. Dudley did in fact murder and then eat Mr. Brooks. My witness’s would include:
• The authorities who they confessed to
• The coroner who tested the contents of Mr.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Detectives took evidence from the apartment and the children’s bodies were taken care of by a coroner.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I will briefly outline the circumstances of the case and how the perpetrator – Coulston, was eventually captured and the evidence that flowed to convict him for the triple murders in Summit Road, Burwood.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They could try and state that she did not poison Mr. Navidad because she was not the only one that had the opportunity. We used her surveillance footage times being off as a point of her lying. They could say she just forgot the exact times. They could say she was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Her fingerprints were not at the crime scene. Ms. Brown’s hair was found there o why not accuse her of the murder. Even though the defense team might have had some arguments I can fight back and respond to all of them. We did a forensic test to prove that only Mrs. Mulroy could have poisoned him because she was the only one that had the opportunity to have put the poison in the cola. The test came back negative on the ice cubes so that ruled out Ms. Brown. Yes she could have forgotten but she left out major points in her interrogation trying to throw us off. She had a motive to kill him. She did have a meeting with him to give her an opportunity to kill him like she had planned. We did not run a DNA test to prove that any kind of hair material or DNA found. That is her office so of course her hair is in her…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury, we are here today to decide the verdict of an alleged aggravated sexual assault on January 8th, 2010. The plaintiff, Ms. Shirley Thompson, states that my client, Mr. Michael Miller, abducted her at knife point and raped her twice. My client has given a statement that he did in fact have sexual intercourse with her, but it was consensual.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    White V. Gibbs Case Study

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Walsh and Ms. Babbitt, argued that the defense should not be granted summary judgment and that the case should move to a trial. The plaintiff’s counsel argues that it would have been impossible for the bartender to not recognize that Mr. Hard was visibly intoxicated. They also argue that Mr. Hard’s intoxication induced the reckless behavior that led to the death of Mr.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Archer’s inconsequential remark became twisted with her own ideas, ideas that stemmed from an unstable mind. On Hell Night, Mr. Archer told her to put the fraternity flag above the door. However, Ms. Milan Jackson saw this as the ideal moment to perform the perfect stunt. Her drunken, mentally broken, perfection seeking, and emotionally unstable self took an action that although was ill advised, was an action taken all on her own. Mr. Archer does not deserve to be second guessed as a murderer in this horrid ordeal. If you strip away the high emotions of the accused, and if you strip away the poorly drawn interpretations and implications put forth by the State, all that will remain are the facts. The entirety of the prosecution's guess of a motive is built around an insignificant remark coming from Chris Archer, saying that he believes Ms. Jackson to be overconfident and disloyal to Pat. If justice may be served, you the jury must see that there is no evidence brought forth that Mr. Chris Archer has any motive whatsoever significant enough for him to take Milan Jackson’s innocent life. Moreover, no intention to kill, voluntarily or involuntarily, can be confidently determined beyond a reasonable…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    landmark case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simmons Death Penalty

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the 1993 Missouri court case Ropers v. Simmons, Christopher Simmons (17 y/o), accompanied by his two friends Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, devised a plan to kill Shirley Cook. The full plan was to commit burglary and homicide by breaking and entering the residence, tying up the woman, and tossing the victim off a bridge (We the People). The night of the murder the three met at midnight, Tessmer later decided to drop out of the plan. Without Tessmer, Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands, covered her eyes, and then drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Although Simmons later pleaded innocence because of the evidence, leading up to the crime, Simmons had expressed to his two friends that he wanted to murder someone (Roper v. Simmons). He deliberately planned this murder for months and presented his plan to his two friends who later played a significant role in the ruling.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, the actions committed by Dudley and Stephens were quite obviously illegal. Though not on the mainland, this court's jurisdiction falls in the area of the crime at hand. Laws are still laws in our waters. Secondly, the men decided to kill Brooks with the justification that he "was going to die soon anyway" and they should "get it over with". This type of euthanasia was completely unjustified, based on the fact that Brooks rejected the idea of having the men kill and eat him when his lot was drawn. Though Brooks may have been on his death bed, Dudley and Stephens committed murder by taking his life. Also, the discussion of drawing the lots was in no way contractual, thus making in no way a binding agreement on the obscene act.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: Nine young black boys riding in an open train car were involved in a fight. When the fight ceased, two white women claimed the black boys raped them. Once the boys got off the train in Scottsboro, Alabama, police picked them up and placed them in jail. The men appeared in court, frightened, and unrepresented. The defendants were charged with a capital offence and therefore had the right for counsel to be appointed to them by the court. However, the court decided to call on the lawyers from the surrounding area. Of course no lawyer came to their defense. The day before the case, on April 6, a lawyer took their case. Because he was not able to prepare an adequate defense 8 of the 9 defendants were convicted and sentenced to death.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When looking at the case of The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and the punishment that the two men face after conviction is one that requires a lot of thought (Brody and Acker, 2010). These two men were faced with a difficult situation that due to their being in a position of making life threating decisions that would determine if they all lived or if they all died with the sacrifice of one saving the other three men. These two men’s fate, after their criminal conviction, should be evaluated with the circumstances of the crime of murder with the intent of the two men to survive while stuck in the middle of the ocean with no way out (Gollwitzer and Keller, 2010).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With no fingerprints to speak of, and the one of a kind statement being proved false there is no possible way to prove anything but how the murder happened. Not who did it. The only argument they have against this boy is the fickle testimony of a few people, and a fight between the boy and the father. This is not enough for a conviction. (Rose 24)…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics