Preview

Short Summary: The Virginia Plan

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Short Summary: The Virginia Plan
The Virginia Plan

The Virginia Plan stood on the claim of expanding national power over the states and to have representation to states based on their amount of population. One of the delegates whom were for a stronger national government had mentioned the new country was ready for tyranny. I believe that the thought of having a country under tyranny is dangerous and feeding the national government too much power, especially since the states have already suffered under the harsh rule of tyrant leader, King George III. Therefore this plan would be unfair to the smaller states, because the Virginia Plan called for more representation to states with bigger population for electoral college votes. It would be unfair to the small states, it isn’t their fault for having a smaller population and devalues them. It doesn’t make sense to have more electoral
…show more content…

His proposition with the plan was to expand the government power over states, representation for states to be based on their populations and overall called for excessive change to the Articles of Confederation. “In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure.” James Madison expressed in Notes of the Secret Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787. He believed that if elections were available to all classes of people, it would be the downfall of business and governing. But because the government was going to be responsible and in control of the states, it is important to take everybody’s word equally as they are ones being governed. Writer of the New Jersey Plan and delegate of New Jersey, William Paterson had presented the idea to retain equal representation for each state - regardless of population differences. He as well offered amendments to better the national government. Unfortunately this plan wasn’t taken serious during the Constitutional

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As you know, we are going through the Great Compromise. Congress cannot decide whether or not it is fair to adopt the New Jersey Plan, or the Virginia Plan. This compromise (An agreement with two sides or more, where every side gives up some of what they may want.) is one that potentially will shape the future government. You might be in between the two plans, but after you read this, you’ll know why you should choose the New Jersey Plan. This plan is about having an organized government, and the ideas on what the Congress should have the power to do.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Describe the structure of government as proposed in the “Virginia Plan” and “New Jersey Plan” of the Constitutional Convention.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1643, there were four New England colonies who formed a confederation and they came up with the Articles of Confederation. In 1697, William Penn brought forth a plan of union which never was implemented. Last but not least in 1754, Benjamin Franklin came up with the Albany Plan of Union. “The history of colonial efforts to cooperate or unite demonstrates that the colonies had no strong or sustainable need for a common government.” All of those plans never went into effect but that doesn't mean that they didn't want to unite. In the following paragraphs I'm going to state why I think this statement is wrong by using documents A, B, and C.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notes on the States of Virginia was the full length book written by Thomas Jefferson in 1781, during the American revolutionary war. In 1780, the secretary of the French legation to the United States “Francois Marbois” had drawn up 22 questions wishing to collect information on each of the 13 states to answer to his superiors. Those questions were sent to several possible informants including Joseph Jones, who at that time a member of congressional delegation. He had written the original questionnaire in his own hand writing and had given it to Thomas Jefferson; the second governor of Virginia who he had thought was the best person to answer all of the complicated questions about the beloved state. Joseph Jones knew about this Virginian’s knowledge and passion about the largest of the 13 original states. Jefferson rearranged Marboi’s 22 queries into the 23 queries and conducts his readers from a discussion of geography of Virginia through the state’s civilization.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Creating the new Constitution would bind the states into one alliance and allow the country to run smoothly. Hamilton thoughtfully accepts the notion of the government allowing the states running themselves is not foolish. However, the states would be “depending for its execution on the good faith of the parties”(8), and only take laws created by the national government as “mere recommendations” and “disregard at their option” (8). The states selfishness about their own well being and not considering that of the nation is a clear factor that the power of executing in a correct manner as a union is important for the future of the country in order for us not to fall under an anarchy. Furthermore, the flaws of the Articles of Confederation increased overtime causing there to be numerous issues.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Virginia plan is a good plan to not say the least. That the amount of representatives in congress should be based on population. But problems are aroused by this plan because it would tip the scale in congress toward the southern states. Reasons…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan gave the strong national power that could make and enforce laws, and collect taxes. The people would be governed by two forms of government national and state. Both house of the legislature would have representative sitting from the states. This means that big states would occupy more people and more representative would sit and the plan was favored by the big states. Smaller states were scared about the plan because it would mean they would almost have no saying in the government with less representative. Smaller states were not in favor of the Virginia plan so they decided to draw up their own plan Known as The New Jersey Plan. This means that it would have equal represtation and each states gets the same number of representative in the house. The New Jersey plan was rejected for the new constitution, because…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that the Constitutional Convention came together to reform the Articles of Confederation, but they ended up a whole new plan of government? One of the biggest issues was how representation was going to be set up in the Legislative Branch, so two plans were made, one of which is the Virginia Plan. Under the Virginia Plan, the Legislative Branch would be bicameral, or have two houses. Representation would be based on population in both houses, giving Congress and larger states more power. The other plan was called the New Jersey Plan, which is the plan smaller states favored.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution. Paterson delivered the New Jersey Plan with his concern of the voices of smaller states would be drawn out of larger states if the Virginia Plan been approved (Abraham Messler, 1954). His plan was particularly in response to the Virginia Plan, which in favor of proportional representation and a bicameral legislature( Leonard Williams Levy, 2000). The New Jersey Plan supported each state has one vote regardless of their population and the unicameral legislature. The with the final decision had come after their intense debate, that was the rejection of the New Jersey Plan, and the main reason was because it was too concentrated on gain more power to small states rather than the…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Population)…” But, on the other hand small states would have a disadvantage of representation in the House like, Rhode Island. Big state v. small state guarded against tyranny because we came up with a compromise of two senators for each state. Through the compromise no one state gains more control and has more power than the…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Also, he stated that, “The different governments will control each other, while each will be controlled by itself.”. These quotes in themselves state furthermore that Federalism helped protect against Tyranny all throughout history. All in all, federalism allows to apply protection against tyranny by distributing the…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who desired change in government were called Federalists. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and Ben Franklin were all a part of the Federalists. The Federalists believed that the economy was in turmoil because of the Articles (Doc 1). Under the Articles each state had its own currency which created a problem for interstate trade. Another issue that the Federalists had was that the rich were not making money. On August 1, 1786, George Washington wrote a letter addressed to John Jay stating that they “have errors to correct”. In saying this Washington agrees in the fact that the Articles needed to be revised. The Federalists believed that the government trusted the people with too many rights. The states were allowed to refuse the Federal government whenever they chose. The new country that was trying to establish themselves, weren’t united, but instead “thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited States” (Doc 3). The central government didn’t have enough power under the Articles. The Federalists believed that even though they didn’t want to be ruled again like they were under England’s rule, that it was necessary to have a strong central government.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is the Virginia Plan, also called the Large State Plan, which advised that the representation in a bicameral legislature be proportional to property or population. The other is the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for all states regardless to population in a unicameral legislature. Had the Virginia Plan been adopted entirely, large states would always have a dominant voice over the smaller states. On the other hand, if the New Jersey plan had been adopted entirely, bigger states with bigger needs would never prevail. When the delegates began to discuss this issue, they willingly agreed that a bicameral legislature is necessary for the new national government. They differed widely, however, in the representation of the two houses. Bitter debates followed until, finally, the compromise of equal representation in the House and proportional representation in the Senate was reached. In Henry Steele Commager 's article, "The Constitution, Was It an Economic Document?", he remarked that the framers "feared the powers of the majority, as they feared all power unless controlled" (141); the compromise of the representation of the houses underscores exactly this point because it prevents an absolute body majority which would prove to be fatal to the country had they had a malevolent intent. Furthermore, the compromise effectively appealed to all states and therefore…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1606, hundreds of settlers went on a journey from England to the Virginia colony. They were in search of a new life, and wealth. Early on in their journey, they stumble upon many hardships, as expressed by George Percy (Doc. B). By the use of the indentured servants and slaves they were able to change the Virginia colony by basing their economy around tobacco.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia Plan states that the “Legislative Executive and Judiciary powers within the several States ought to be bound by oath to support the articles of Union”. Furthermore the Virginia Plan calls for the negative on all laws of the state. Upon reading such parts of the Virginia Plan, one might think that the Virginia Plan gives too much power to the national government, limiting the individual state’s power greatly. Indeed, delegates against a stronger national government such as George Clinton feared that it will threaten the economic success of individual States and will lead to the abuses of power experienced under the British rule. However, after a careful analysis of the history and reason behind the Virginia Plan, one will understand that this is not the case.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays