Preview

Should Electoral College Be Abolished

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Electoral College Be Abolished
The electoral college should not be abolished. The electoral college is a very important part of the election process. After all, it wasn't established in Article II for no reason. Our very own founding fathers did not like the idea of the general population directly voting for president. They feared that presidents would always come from highly populated states. The electoral college should be kept because it creates a clear winner, the electors make more educated decisions, and the electoral college ensures a two party system. The electoral college should be kept for a variety of reasons. One specific reason is that the electoral college establishes a clear winner in the presidential election. In some popular votes, for example George W. Bush v. Albert Gore in 2000. It was evident that this race would be close from the start, and indeed it was. So close, in fact, that the winner of the popular vote would be decided by just one state, Florida. Bush was originally the winner by a margin of only a few hundred votes, a very small fraction out of millions upon millions of voters. However, there were …show more content…
Some may think that a two party system is not fair, but if there were more than two major parties, people would start to get confused about who said what and to whom. And, as we all know, when people have a decision with too many options to choose from, they simply decide to not choose at all resulting in not voting also known as decreased voter turnout, which would not help America's political system. Decreased voter turnout means that not everyone chose to vote even though they could and a higher number of people voted the year before. The electoral college should be kept for the good of our country. The electoral college creates a clear winner after voting, the electors who actually vote for president make more educated decisions, and the electoral college ensures a two party

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 4 Study Guide

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason why the Electoral College was created was because our Founding Fathers were distrustful in allowing the president to be elected directly by the people. As a result, the Electoral College would be a system to determine who will be the next president and who will be the next vice president of the United States though the votes of electors from every state. This would create an indirect way for votes to elect their president.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much of the dialogue on whether the Electoral College should be eliminated stems from the fact that a candidate can win the presidency despite receiving fewer popular votes than his opponent. There have been four instances where a candidate has won the election without winning the popular contest: John Quincy Adams in 1824,…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many reasons the founder established the electoral college system. To begin with, the founder established the electoral college to avoid the control of the election by elites in the congress, and they also feared that allowing the population to choose the president through popular by making an uneducated decision. Moreover, one of the main reasons the electoral college was established is to prevent the tyranny of the majority or any kind of tyranny. In fact, one of the main reasons the United State Government is divided into three branches which are the Executive, Legislative, and judicial. To elaborate, the founders feared that allowing complete democracy and the bare majority of the popular vote to determine the outcome of the election…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College was established in 1787 as a compromise between having Congress select the next President of the United States, and having a direct democracy in which the popular vote selected the next President. The system has worked for over 200 years, so why change it now?…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason is because it allows for the possibility that one candidate would win the majority of the popular vote across the nation, and still be able to lose the election if another candidate wins the electoral vote. This has happened on more than one occasion, most recently in 2000 when George W. Bush won the electoral vote and became President despite the fact that his opponent, Al Gore, won the popular vote. The world was shocked when Bush was named winner of the U.S. presidential election, even after more U.S. voters had cast ballots for Gore. How could the U.S. call itself a democracy, yet not select its officials based on majority rule? The U.S. was not established as a pure democracy, but as a republic where voters elect representatives and electors. Whether there has ever been anything close to a pure and total democracy is debatable. There has never been universal suffrage. The result in 2000 election led many people to call for Electoral College reform or a change to a direct popular vote system. No major changes have yet been made to the system; the electoral college remains the “democratic” way we elect the President of the United…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2000 election, Al Gore and Ralph Nader split the left wing vote. (Document 5). While Nader only won 3% of the popular vote, the election was so close that 3% more of the popular vote would have put Gore in office. (Document 5). This also happened in the 1912 election, when the Republicans split the vote between the incumbent Roosevelt, and Taft, allowing Wilson to win. The voters know that this will always be the result, so they do not vote for the party that their beliefs align with the closest. Instead, they vote Republican or Democrat to actually have a chance of winning the election. Third party candidates cannot win not only because of our two-party system, but because of our winner-take-all system. If two candidates split the liberal vote, the conservative party will win all the votes in that state. If this trend continues, the conservative party will win the entire election. (Document 6). If the United States based elections on the popular vote instead of the Electoral College, then people would be more likely to vote with the party they agree with most, not the party that is more likely to win. This would make citizens actually want to vote because they have more options and they would feel like their vote actually…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if I were to tell you that something in the constitution was actually unconstitutional? The Electoral College is, and there are many more reasons it is a flawed system of electing our president. As it stands today, electoral votes only matter in a few states and some states do not matter in the grand scheme of things. Besides that, we have recently had a president elected who did not win the popular vote. This president has made a number of controversial decisions, and many call for him to be impeached for a large variety of reasons.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument most used against the Electoral College is that there is a possibility for a candidate to win the popular vote and still lose the election. This has happened four times since the Electoral College went into effect. The most recent time this had happened was in the elections of 2000. Historian Rick Shenkman from George Mason University states that “there has been no aspect of what the founders worked up in Philadelphia that has received more criticism than the Electoral College.” (Dotinga, 2008) Ever since the Electoral College went into effect there have been more than 700 attempts to either abolish it completely or to drastically ratify it (Uhlmann,…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College always has it’s print on the elections and more importantly on the very close elections. It has done it’s job the over 200 plus years and throughout fifty presidential elections. So the electoral college is promising and durable. Both parties Republican and Democrat candidate feel at times as if they win the popular vote they win the election, but that’s when the electoral votes play their part. The electoral votes are combined by states…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, the Electoral College should go. I have three reasons why the Electoral College should be either get rid of. My reasons are that it focuses more on smaller states than big states, Hamilton had other intentions for the Electoral College, and the Electoral College was meant to be for small states so it would be more equal.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Electoral College has been a topic of discussion ever since the election of 2000. When you rely on this system, there could easily be a different outcome in the electoral vote and the popular vote. With the Electoral College in place, some of Americans’ votes are basically worthless. When the Electoral College was put into place it was a solution to a problem of the 1780’s, now in the 21st century, all Americans should have a voice. Although some people feel the Electoral College is just, the Electoral College is an unfair and outdated way of picking a President; the popular vote is the best way to elect a President in the best interest for the public.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college is a group of people that vote based on the popular vote in their district. The people who are in the electoral college can be regular people who are picked by the state legislature. How many points a state get is based on that state’s population. The points are the number of electoral college representatives who can vote for whoever they want. When the state is won all the points go to the person who won that state. So should the electoral college stay the same, or changed? The electoral college should be completely abolished and the popular vote of the entire country should be the final say in who is president. The electoral college doesn’t give an equal say to each person, state, and can come down to a tie.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I’m going to be talking about if we should eliminate the electoral college. On December 13, 2000, vice president Al Gore conceded the presidential election to Governor Bush. A day earlier, a lengthy and expensive manual vote recount process in Florida was stopped by the United States supreme court despite Bush leading by only 537 votes with Bush winning the states by 25 electoral votes put him over the needed threshold of 275. This election result was highly unusual not just because of Supreme Court decisions it was also the 4th time in united states history that a candidate had garnered majority of the popular votes but lost the election. As you all also have heard this type of scenario happened again with Hillary winning the popular vote…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays