Preview

Should Professors Advocate Their Own Socio-Political Views in the Classroom?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Professors Advocate Their Own Socio-Political Views in the Classroom?
Professors views on today’s issues

Many people debate if professors should or shouldn’t be allowed to advocate their views own political or social issues in class. This is a debate that causes many issues but yet there hasn’t been any type of conclusion to if it is okay or not. I personally believe professors should not be allowed to advocate their views on political or social issues in the class because they can corrupt students’ minds and conflicts between professor, student and parents could form.
First off, professors’ shouldn’t advocate their views on social or political issues in class because they can corrupt a student’s minds. When professors teach about a topic they then explain their own opinion after. Therefore, making the student believe there is only one way to support that issue because they aren’t getting both sides of the topics beliefs. Imagine that an instructors “freedom in the classroom” is merely the freedom to offer neutral summary of the current state of a discipline, abjuring controversial and individual views1. There is a difference between expressing ones freedom of speech and corrupting ones mind to have the same belief as you. Most professors have their mind set on a certain side of an issue around the world and when they believe in something it’s only obvious they will try to manipulate someone else to have that same opinion. For example, being a democratic or republican. Lets say a teacher is a democrat, he or she will then explain why being the democratic party is so great but will only bad mouth republicans if, he or she says one word about them. This is corrupting a student’s mind, students should be given pros and cons of both sides fairly so they can learn correctly and form their own true opinion.
Also, conflicts between professor, student and parents could form. Some professors could judge or mistreat a student just one their opinion on something causing conflict. For example, when I was in the fifth grade this became a



Cited: 1. Ruba, Michael Ba. "Freedom to Teach | Inside Higher Ed." Freedom to Teach | Inside Higher Ed. N.p., 11 Sept. 2007. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. 2. Oconnor, Erin. "AAUP To Critics: What, Us Biased?" AAUP To Critics: What, Us Biased? N.p., 25 Sept. 2007. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. 3. "Freedom in the Classroom." AAUP. Associations Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, June 2007. Web. 03 Nov. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Hard Rock High

    • 2594 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Kawalski, J.T. (2007) Case studies on educational administration. (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon…

    • 2594 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of The New York Times article “The Campus Crusaders” David Brooks discusses students high sensitivity level in education today, Professors must be cautious of what they say during lectures, so they aren't accused of violating students personal or emotional feelings. The reason is campus activists are reacting emotionally to their idea of fighting for a moral cause or issue. According to the author, the theory is ”... the ultimate source of authority is not some hard-to-understand truth. It is everybody's personal feelings.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pass, S., (2007). A Classroom Discipline Plan That Teaches Democracy. Issues in Teacher Education. Retrieved from: http://ezproxy.utas.edu.au/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/233311412?accountid=14245.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1787, Thomas Jefferson wrote “Above all things, I hope the education of the common people will be attended to; convinced that on their good sense we may rely with the most security for the preservation of a due degree of liberty” (Tanner & Tanner, 1995, p. 4). Jefferson theorized that indifference to education puts liberty and self-governance in peril. Education could provide each individual the opportunity to gain knowledge in order to promote self-governing and freedom (Tanner & Tanner, 1995).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, “First Amendment rights are available to teachers and students, subject to application in light of the special characteristics of the school environment.”…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    That’s not to say that I agree with that mindset. I think capitalism, as in most cases, should be the driving factor in what speech is allowed where. If people will pay to watch a speech, then the speaker and speech should be allowed. If students are opposed to speech, they ought to protest by not paying their…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Students should be able to express themselves because many students have little to no freedom in their life outside of school.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hate Speech in Colleges

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hudson, David. "Free Speech on Public College Campuses." Hate Speech and Campus Speech Codes .…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    to be, but rarely have been told how they can achieve their goal. This is…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brookfield 2002

    • 3500 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Bullough, R. V., Knowles, J. G., and Crow, N. A. Emerging as a Teacher. New York:…

    • 3500 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Point #1: Safe-spaces take away from higher education. According to article, On Safety and Safe Spaces by Matthew Pratt Guterl hereby states,”A vocal handful of faculty members worry that their free speech -- or, on a lower frequency, their academic freedom -- is under siege.” Point #2: Trigger warnings and safespaces causes pressure at colleges. One billionaire businessman named Michael Bloomberg commented at a commencement speech at the University of Michigan by saying,” The fact that some university boards and administrations now bow to pressure and shield students from these ideas through ‘safe spaces,’ ‘code words,’ and ‘trigger warnings’ is, in my view, a terrible mistake,” Bloomberg said to a chorus of cheers. “The whole purpose of college is to learn how to deal with difficult situations – not run away from them” (Bellware). Point #3: Students do not have any authority, therefore, the college/university does. University of Chicago's letter says,” "we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own." And, if you’ve watched students at other campuses, the dean warns, don’t get any crazy ideas about protesting invited speakers: "we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial." And, for the love of Milton Friedman, "Our commitment to academic…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discussion Board Response

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While this supposition is the conceptual intention of curriculum design, it is unachievable in practice. Teaching is a fluid action in which discussion and exploration continually have a place. Through the process of student-directed discussion and exploration, the teacher inevitably will reveal his/her beliefs and bias whether intended overtly or not. Instructionally, sharing ones’ beliefs and bias can be beneficial if they are acknowledged candidly and expressed respectfully in an environment which accommodates different views. There are mitigating parameters to consider, however. The latitude to share one’s personal perspectives may vary depending upon the organizational environment of the institution. Often an institute’s vision and mission provide guidance outlining the amount of customization an educator can apply toward the curriculum.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A students world

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Until now, students have been very patient with parents and teachers, but with such a long history of mistreatment and unfairness by the parents and teachers toward students, it is now time that the rest of the world find out what has been going on.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays