Preview

Should Singlish Be Banned?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Singlish Be Banned?
Should Singlish be banned?
Singlish has become the word of the tongue in Singapore. Walk along any street in Singapore, it is inevitable that you will hear someone speaking Singlish. Singlish, being one local feature of Singapore, is a language compromising of English-based language mixed with Chinese dialects as well was a few Malay. It has unmistakably brought some negative impacts on the process of speaking Standard English in Singapore, however, I do not think banning it is necessary now.

Firstly, Singlish has already become a trademark of Singapore. It is already treated as a national identity of Singapore having been used for many many years. Besides, Singlish, being a unique mix of English and dialects, is a unique language found in Singapore, and only Singapore. Singlish has already has its roots deep in Singpore. Who are we to remove this national identity and ban Singlish? In addition to this, other countries also have their variations of English just like Singlish. Singlish is a different version of English - just like the Scottish, Irish, Welsh, American (several different versions), Jamaican, Australian and New Zealand versions. Who are we then to say Singlish cannot be accepted whilst these languages can?

Next, Singlish, to Singaporeans, is the basic medium of communicating with one another. Singlish is widely spoken in our everyday lives. As Singlish is a language is the language which most Singaporeans understand, it is the language that gets the point across the most. Therefore, Singlish has already become a bridge between the people in Singapore. Singlish is also used often for casual chats. It feels more intimate and it is something closer to our hearts by some turn of cultural evolution. Take a look at MSN chats or SMS(es) in particular. Singlish is used so often in these mediums just because it is an easier way of communication. Therefore, we should not break this medium of communication by banning the use of Singlish.

In addition, it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another reason is that this dangerous decision will silence the people who believe in so-called traditional language.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since all of their peers are speaking and writing in this way, people in the government feel like they must continue to use unclear English so they can fit in with their peers. La Corte states, “It’s almost as if we have hundreds of different tribes out there with different languages… Knowing the language of that tribe is essential to belonging to it” (La Corte 83). Being able to speak like the other people around you gives people a sense of pride and belonging. If they stop communication in such a way, they may feel as if they no longer belong in that “group” anymore. Even though unclear language can separate the people from the government and threaten the democratic process, the government still is hesitant to change its ways.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exhausted debate on whether the use of the 'N' word is appropriate for use between all ethnicities is still very much alive and is continuously igniting feuds and controversies. Recently, during a Kendrick Lamar concert, a Caucasian woman was asked to join the rapper in his performance of "m.A.A.d. City". Lamar is notorious for his focus on racial injustice and life as an African American male, so the explicitness of his lyrics should be far from shocking. Not very far into the fan's rendition of the song, Lamar stops and chastises her in front of the crowd for not censoring the 'N' word, which was prevalent throughout the lyrics of the song.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay 1 purple

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Language is an important part of life we use it every day to communicate with each other.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years, there has been debate over whether or not the Congress should pass legislation which would make English the official language in the United States of America. On one side of the spectrum, supporters of the issue feel that official English would help to unify America under one language, thus promoting a faster, cost-effective and efficient way of communicating. On the other side of the argument, opponents feel that making English the official language would be a detriment to our unique “melting pot” culture and would discourage immigrants and tourists. Those against official English also claim that discrimination against non-native speakers may become a problem as well.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A student passes two years of Spanish to graduate as it is required. The student’s family is going on vacation to Mexico. The student decides it would be fun to use his knowledge of Spanish. As the student lands in Mexico, he is greeted by, “¡Hola, me llamo es Jacob! ¿Como estuvo tu viaje?” But as the student tries to make out what he says, he pulls out an English to Spanish book instead. Students learn Spanish because it is required to graduate, but they never become fluent at it even in situations that would be useful. Spanish should not be required in schools as some students are never fluent, students that have anxiety over Spanish cannot graduate, and English is the most common language spoken in the United States.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout our nation's history, we have recognized various languages that have made their way to the United States. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech. The Fourteenth Amendment forbids abridging the privileges and immunities of naturalized citizens. American English laws would violate these constitutional rights, founded on certain liberties, which we as Americans believe to be undeniable to every citizen.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that it is thwarting children's ability to effectively communicate both written and orally, and there are arguments saying that it actually helps children communicate better. In this essay I will be looking at both sides of the argument and trying to come up with a conclusion as to whether texting is actually destroying the English language.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The country is united by the different culture that molds them. It would decrease the number of immigrants but increase on the number of hate crimes. People with limited english would be discriminated and may lead to terror attacks. In addition, United States of America is also known as the land of the free and the land of opportunity. Wouldn’t making English as the official language of this country takes away the opportunity?…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article "Don't Make English Official - Ban It Instead" by Dennis Baron focuses on the idea of Congress considering to make English the "official language" of the United States. Baron uses the academic approach in portraying English as a tradition, a functional system of codes that enables people to interact with each other in the society. Using this as his primary thesis, Baron argues that English should not be implemented as the country's national language, since "it's hardly even English anymore." They clearly state in the article that even though English isn't the official language non-English-speaking immigrants are still picking up. Many people in America want English to be the official language that everyone should speak. I do not completely agree with this. It would be too difficult for everyone to follow this request. Also, many people learn two different languages, which ultimately increases their knowledge. Dennis Baron's idea is that banning English would have the opposite of effect, that people that speak English would still continue to speak English and those who do not yet speak it will be more tempted to try it out. If we were to ban the English language then people would be more eager to learn it because people want what they cannot have. I personally find the idea of this humorous in a way. It's relating it to a bigger theme or main idea that it is almost human nature to try or do the things we are not suppose to do. Not that Congress would ever ban the English language or really any language in general, I think this piece is really aiming towards the idea of human nature rather than actually wanting to ban the English…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The events in Canada at the time galvanized a fear of a multicultural society, which could result in the balkanization of the United States if left unimpeded. The proponents of the English only debate also have used the additional costs of having to produce multiple language ballots as another reason to rail against local and state governments that do not support English only initiatives. The opponents to the English only debate consider it to be a reaffirmation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which adhere to the belief that the language of an individual is their cultural identity and it should not be abridged. The funding of educational institutions is not to deny fair access to educational opportunities such as providing support to students whose spoken language may be other than…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    English Around the World

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    English is everywhere. It is on signs, clothing, soft drinks, and household products around the world. In spite of the popularity of English words and phrases, however, they are not always welcome. Some people think that the used of English words is threatening the purity of their native language. In 1975, the French started a commission to try to stop, and even give fines for, the use of English words. Some countries have tried to eliminate English as their official language in order to save their native tongue.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nowadays, in the fast pacing world, the explosion of technology has brought everything underneath our hand. We can clearly see the generation gap that made the world now and the past ten years is different. The patterns of life changing and all sorts of routine thing that involved us are different too. In the past ten years, the outside culture will take a long time to absorb in our country. It’s a different situation now, with everything at our fingertip, and the simple example would be in the entertainment industry. The latest fashion, style, music, film, movie and in a simple word, an entertainment will easily enter our country without hesitation and no boundaries.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why English should be the second official language of Taiwan is that it makes us more competitive. Since Taiwan is highly dependent on import and export with foreigners and English is one of the most international languages in the world, mastering English brings us more opportunities to trade with other countries. Those big companies all over the world not only trade with those countries that offer cheap labors or lands but also make business with those that hold great knowledge of techniques and abilities to make a win-win financial situation. Therefore, if we set English as our second official language, those talented people in a variety of industries who know better in communicating with foreigners can create more opportunities to make a great fortune through international business trade.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abolishing Ppsmi

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    First, the decision of the government to abolish PPSMI was done after ‘considering all views’, according to our current Deputy Prime Minister. He never really told us if all views were fairly represented, or even those who voiced out their views are even qualified to do so. PAGE has good reason to voice their support for the policy, as they are parents concerned with the future of their children’s education, and are valid interested parties. Undoubtedly, there are also parents who are against PPSMI due to concerns for their children, but what business has Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, A Samad Said, Gerakan Mansuhkan PPSMI (GMP) and the Malaysia Linguistic Association (PLM) to make comments on this issue? Anybody is entitled to their opinion, but it seems quite stupid of the government to agree to the opinions of these groups, who are not even involved in the teaching of Maths and Science, and who, other than the pretentious title of ‘defenders of national language’ (refer to argument below), have nothing to contribute to this debate. This is true in the case of DBP, whose lack of production or even…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays